LGBTQ+ views

I generally support gay rights, but not at the expense of other peoples rights

Personally and legality wise, I conditionally support gay marriage (based on this line of thinking, as a way to eventually usher in Unorganized Marriage for both straight couples and gay couples):

Personally and Legality wise I am against gay marriages that infringe on other people’s rights

Personally and Legality wise, I support gay marriages that don’t infringe on other people’s rights

Systematically I support gay marriage being legal regardless if those gay marriages infringe on other people’s rights, but only if Civil Marriage, Religious Marriage and Common Law Marriage for straight couples and gay couples are abolished and a very specific form of privatized marriage that I write below is legalized for both straight couples and gay couples, otherwise I am the same systematically on gay marriage as I am personally and legality wise 

This very specific form of conditional Privatized marriage for straight couples and gay couples would be within a structure of growing control of the marriage industry by the government through political intervention and regulation via a newly created Independent group of marriage companies board created by the government. Thus the government would have a role in regulating and controlling the marriages in the country despite them being privatized

This would also include the privatization of some public sectors of the US government that have connections (direct and indirect) of the marriage industry,  by companies affiliated with NGOs or the government.

The government would give credits to private marriage companies with millions of earmarks to promote good relationships between them. The government would also make laws demanding that all marriage companies in the US join a newly created Independent group of companies or suffer penalties

Moreover, marriage companies in the US who were loyal to the government and their goals in running the privatized marriage industry the way they wanted would be rewarded with protection and more favorable, pro business laws create for said complying companies (which would increase the profits and investment for those marriage companies).   However, due to the nature of this very specific form of conditional privatization, the government could manipulate this system to do what it wants despite it being privatized.  So I am sort of rooting (systematically) for the type of marriage above to be replace Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage for people of all sexual orientations (straight and gay)

Even though I am fine with gay marriage being legalized in 2015, a part of me would have preferred that instead of legalizing gay marriage in the US and the west, gay couples in the US and the west who wanted legal rights and recognition for their relationships would instead be given the same rights that gay couples in the UK had in the last years before gay marriage was legalized in the UK. 

I try to get politicians to abolish Civil Marriages, Common Law Marriages and Religious Marriages and then make Unorganised Marriage the only legal form of marriage for straight couples and gay couples etc (Unorganised as in Unorganised Sector in India unorganised). Which is basically more privatized than privatized. Marriage is a forced social construct anyway so less officialness of it the better off we are. The state should really stay out of the marriage business 

Anti gay people should realize (in order for them to gain empathy for gays or at least to provide nuance and background) that gays and their empathetic heterosexual pro gay allies feel low or offended/triggered when they see someone not supporting gay marriage or gay rights (or being homophobic) . Gays used to feel they were the only gay people in their family, job, group or town/city etc. 

In a weird way, I guess I can see gays being gay as a silver lining . I always get upset seeing people dressing the same way, acting the same way, doing the same things etc, so to see people be different sexual orientation wise (by being gay or bi sexual etc) is a nice refreshing break from that for me. It means they aren't afraid to be different and not be 'brainwashed' to be 'normal'.  

Seeing gays get their equal rights and acceptance should give people like me who are different hope that maybe being different and unique will be not only accepted but maybe something that is actually commonplace in the future where people don't all dress , act etc the same and don't do the same things.

There is a decent outside chance I may soften up on the gay issue at some point in the future and I thus may become something that is between being like a Radically Centrist lean Radically Center Left version of Rudy Boesch during and after Survivor Borneo on the gay issue and me being exactly like a Rick Warren idealized version of Borat on the gay issue in thoughts, words and actions

A lesser but still a big reason I am against gay rights and gay marriages that infringe upon other peoples’ rights is because I feel that gays are being used by liberals as stepping stones to further their own selves and party. Liberals also use gays as background objects to fill their diversity quotas/fetishes or to make themselves look 'moral' which also triggers me. Unlike Liberals, I at least have respect for the Christian right since they level with them and try to in their minds help them in what they perceive to be the ‘correct’ way and treat them as humans not as background objects.

If I was born in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s, 2050s etc, and being pro gay and supporting gay rights (including gay marriage) was still a Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal thing to do,  I would be pro gay and more pro gay rights (ie I would support unconditional gay marriage) for my entire life and I'd most likely be an ally of the LGBTQ+ movement in that hypothetical situation too. I'd be as pro gay my whole life in the above hypothetical situation as the majority of Americans born (and will be born) in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s, 2050s etc

I support the repeal of DADT for Libertarian reasons. The IDF and Kurds are proof gays are just as capable of fighting in the military as straights

I believe there was middle ground in the Kentucky marriage license fiasco from years back . I do not condemn Kim Davis. She did what she thought was right

Gays made gay rights a civil rights issue which helped their cause (just giving some context here) 

I accept Log Cabin Republicans as Conservatives, I may not be their biggest cheerleader (to say the least) but they are part of our movement and thus I accept them. I have a Left Wing version of Don't Ask Don't Tell type of acceptance of GOProuders in our movement and I view GOProuders as Sympathetic Anti Heroes.

I support adding a Queer Theory (ideally a Radically Centrist variety) and Gay shame movement (non regressive/center left variety) sub caucus to the Congressional LGBTQ Equality Caucus so I could symbolically support that caucus

I echo this review on a book about Queer Anarchism

Discrimination of LGBGT people not only negatively effects LGBTQ but is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich 

So by fighting against LGBTQ discrimination, it can help all workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of a ti LGBTQ bigotry, their attention would then shift to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people, not just LGBTQ in all aspects. So yeah, selfish motive (help LGBTQ) by doing something that appears woke (fighting against LGBTQ discrimination), might not be that bad of an idea.   To do this, we need to protect LGBTQ people from and possibly kick the sh#t out of any homophobic or transphobic co workers who harass or endanger our LGBTQ co workers like how Roger Goodell use to protect his gay brother as youngster even beating up homophobes who harassed his brother. LGBTQ saviorism is fun. The equality act is too much big gov, we shouldn’t have to rely on the gov to play peacekeeper with such laws they need to focus on relevant things. We the people can do it just fine on our own

I feel in my conscious that in an ideal world, gays should have the same type of bonds and relationships with people of their own sex that David and Jonathan had with each other in the bible (and for females a female version of that) instead of being gay.

I do not support Rick Perry's anti gay early 2010s law which is too harsh and uncompassionate.

I support protecting the dignity and security of elderly LGBTQ people through Christianity to help bridge the gap for them between Earth and the afterlife, along with easier access for STD care, Mushroom semi legalization for LGBTQ elderly people and the creation and expansion of LGBTQ retirement communities (like Andrew Cuomo would want to create and expand) . I also support predistrubition for elderly LGBTQ people. Elderly LGBTQ are a unique asset to our communities 

I oscillate between being far centrist on criminalizing gay acts and straight acts , me having zero tolerance for criminalizing gay acts, and me being against criminalizing gay acts so much I want to infilitrate homophobic organizations who criminalize or try to criminalize gay acts so I can destroy such homophobic organizations from within so I can make gay act criminalization a thing of the past. 

I want the FMA passed but updated and changed to state: 

Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of human heterosexual couples and human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes. This constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups of intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems , galaxies and universes

The first sentence would provide an official definition of legal marriage in the United States. This would be designed to restrict the right of marriage to human heterosexual couples, human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes and to deny that right to intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes. 

I take a Boll Weevil Democrat stance on gays using surrogacy to adopt children.

I support a Murray Rothbard-Anarcho Capitalism form of state adoption for straight couples, gay couples and couples of all sexual orientations to replace our current system of adoption

Since I am Libertarian I am against adoption centers being forced to have anti gay adoption discrimination laws 

I am against banning Gay conversion therapy for Libertarian reasons and slippery slope reasons. That is fascism. I don't know if gay conversion therapy works, I do know Spiritual/Christian (ymmv) counseling is more likely to work than gay conversion therapy (like my former church does) but the latter isn't gay conversion therapy and I don’t know if it works

I am against Lesbian Erasure. Instead of pushing them to transition or be fluid they should either be left alone or if they are already being pushed to be transgender or fluid, instead be pushed to be straight. Even if I supported gay rights, I would be against Lesbian Erasure. Lesbians and Homosexuals are equal and should be equally visible in the LGBQT+ movement

I am against Heterophobia, there is nothing wrong or oppressive about being heterosexual

I am proud to be Straight and I support Straight Pride

I tolerate Heterosexism

I don’t believe Ron Desantis should control what kids learn or don’t learn in school. He is a governor not a  school board president and he should not have passed his authoritarian law. 

However, even though it should have happened via school board meetings involving parents not via an authoritarian law by Ron Desantis, I am fine with the result: Florida kids in grades k-3 not being what some concerned centrist and right wingers people call ‘groomed’ and not having a sensitive topic like LGBTQ topics taught to them when they are too young and immature to grasp such a topic. Students, especially in grades k-3 should learn about the basics like the 3 Rs, history (which maybe could include brief mentions of LGBTQ), not about complex subjects like that. 

I can at least try to tolerate with students in grades 4-8 in social studies and in high school in social studies and sex ed learning  LGBTQ topics (in a neutral way), but anything more and or earlier is a too much. Kids should be kids, not experts on sex and gender topics. Anyone who disagrees would have to convince me whether they would have wanted to learn about LGBT Q topics in school when they were in their youth

I strongly don't believe in in grades k-10 students should be ‘taught’ courses that virtually focus on LGBTQ (like LGBTQ Studies). Let kids be kids. At minimum they should NOT be taught this type of garbage in any grade unless Billy Sunday would approve it

More than 48 percent  of DC LGBTQ+ youth have seriously considered suicide over the past year and percentages across the country aren’t far off. We have to help LGBTQ not even consider suicide since Republicans wrongly take the blame for said suicides. To do this, we need to use our God given minds and hearts along with an all hands on deck approach to do so

I support Intersex rights

I cautiously support transgender marriage being legal

Every transgender person from our reality past present and future has clones of themselves in alternate realities who were born as the same biological sex and gender that those transgender people from our reality became when they became their new gender (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse)

Every transsexual person from our reality past present and future has clones of themselves in alternate realities who were born as the same biological sex that those transsexual people from our reality became when they became their new sex. (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse)

The reason why I am very weary of transgenderism is because transgender people are sadly harmed when they try to defy the patriarchy and its gender expectations and that makes me very wary of supporting transgender rights knowing transgender people could be harmed by such patriarchy. We need to destroy traditional gender roles (and gender roles themselves) and the patriarchy as noted elsewhere in this blog so men acting feminine etc is seen as normal as men acting masculine and women acting masculine etc is seen as normal as women acting feminine now and thus by extension where being transgender etc is seen as being normal as cisgender

Once we destroy the patriarchy (which I am trying to try to do), I will unwearyingly support transgender rights since I will know then that with the patriarchy destroyed, transgender people won’t be harmed anymore since we will be in a world without traditional gender roles or without any gender roles

I see transgenderism as more than a silver lining since transgenderism shakes up the whole boring sex/gender tropes by not allowing people who are born male or female to be pigeon holed into being male or female. This is good because it allows diversity to the male and female sexes where not all females are female (but are really male), and not all males are male (but really female) . 

I take a Boll weevil Democrat stance on the whole pronoun issue

I support NY’s new inclusive licenses and ids 

Award shows should have unisex categories and use the pre 2000s or pre 2010s award categories (retro award categories)

CHILDREN between 4 and 17 SHOULD NOT BE TRANSGENDER. IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR THEM TO BECOME TRANSGENDER because they might be victims of bullying and discrimination by their peers if they become transgender that young. This is to protect them from bullying, not to deny them their rights

I am only ok with infants and toddlers (from newborn to 3 years of age) being transgender because that would mean those babies will not be forced to change their gender in school by activist teachers and be immune to that sick grooming and because being trans from that age onward is almost like they were born as the gender they changed to as an infant/toddler, so it feels more ‘natural’ .Basically a lesser of two evils. I would never allow my niece to be transgender at any age below 17 

Children networks should not be teaching kids about Draq Queens. Children should not be drag queens Shame on Nickelodeon for their indoctrination of our kids with that trash. Drag queens stereotype and objectify women and teach children to do so which makes it harder to destroy the patriarchy so we have to stop this

It is NOT transphobic for non transgender people to not want to date transgender people.

There is NOTHING wrong or transphobic about a woman saying they are proud to be a woman. I fully support Adele's 2022 Brit Awards speech. Her speech was 100 percent positive and great.

Teachers should not encourage students to be transgender. Their job is to teach not to be cheerleaders for students being transgender. I am also against Nickeledeon brainwashing our children with their transgender indoctrination. Shame on them. If that network is called filthy commies they have it coming. Nickelodeon was way more moral and better for kids in the 1970s and 1980s and even into the early 1990s than it is now.

I strongly believe transgender women should not be allowed to get cervical cancer screenings since they don't have those organs and that transgender men should be allowed to get cervical and breast cancer screenings

It should not be a crime or a cancelable offense to dead name

I believe that there is a biological difference between males and females. 

There are only two genders Male and Female but if people want to believe there are a boatload of genders then so be it

Males have penises , females have breasts and vaginas. SCIENCE SAYS SO. Anyone who says otherwise is insane. Science says so 

I fully support the Man or Woman segment that used to be on the Maury show and I hope he brings those segments back

God sees transgender people as the biological sex they were born as.