Voting issues

elections

I support ranked choices voting

I support non partisan primaries

I am ok with Georgia's voting id laws and Texas's voting id laws, but I am conditionally open hearted to abolishing said laws in those states and going back to the 2010s (more liberal) Georgia and Texas voting laws if we can convince potential political alliance people in Georgia and Texas to use all of the tricks that the Democrats used in Georgia and Texas in the 2010s to whether fairly or unfairly get their Democrats elected but to get people in our political alliance elected instead.

People need photo ids to do a lot of things they should need them to vote also for no other reason as to give the appearance of a fair election even if its already fair without that requirement. 

I believe that strict non photo Municipal Ids (for people who can't get ids) and strict, non photo ids (for people who can get ids) should be required for people when they go to vote along with strict reading of the voter rolls. 

Voters who have a reasonable impediment to getting an id should be able to vote

People should be required to register before they vote (that is one issue i will never be 'liberal' on)

I am against the John Lewis voting rights act but not John Lewis who didn't need a rigged voting act for him to be elected for office over his political career. Lewis was a man of character and a Patriot. Making it that easy to vote leaves it open to abuse at best and is just a reactionary thing to the Georgia voting laws at worse which means it is rushed and punitive which is not something a law should be filled with

Ideally we should vote like on Wikipedia during Arbcom elections, everyone votes as many times as they want.

We also need people after every election to thoroughly reading and checking the voter rolls

I am against removing or replacing the Electoral college.

I support First past the post voting

I am against Instant runoff voting 

I might be in the realm of being open to direct democracy replacing representive democracy and giving people a more clear picture of political things but ideally it would be better done somewhere else or done experimently (but then again such voting may have prevented the 2020 Presidental election steal so there is that)

DC should not become a state

Former felons should not vote under the vast majority of circumstances but if I find out that most felons are conservatives (due to persecution of conservatives in the age of Joe Biden) then I may rethink that opposition

Prison inmates should only vote on things related to their prison. But if I find out that most prison inmates are conservatives (due to persecution of conservatives in the age of Joe Biden) then I may rethink that opposition

I would be lying if I said I did not believe that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden.  There is just too much smoke not to be fire, see these links  along with this line of thinking:   If the election wasn’t stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden, the Democrats and their allies wouldn’t be acting the way they have/do on the topic of possible election fraud . The Democrats and their allies (including the MSM) aggressively canceling, smearing ,shaming and going after people who has the audacity to question the election (as if questioning the election is sone uber humongous sin that must be stamped out by the ministry of ‘truth’), is a red flag that the election might have been stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden since guilty people don’t act like the Democrats, their allies snd Joe Biden have acted.

Despite this, I am so traumatized by the fact that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden, I literally force myself 24/7 to pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election (I've been pretending that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election since late 2020

This is similar to how I use to pretend that the 2002 NFL Interconference matchups were the NFC East vs AFC East, NFC North vs the AFC West, and the NFC West vs AFC North. Similar to how in the late 1990s to mid 2000s,  I use to pretend that I was born 4 to 7 years earlier in this life. Similar to how in the early 2000s, I use to pretend that a decade earlier (in the late 1980s and early 1990s) I was a cast member on a fictitious kids variety show in a sunbelt state that was similar to The Electric Company, Kids Incorporated and that variety show that Wade Robson's character mentioned that he was a cast member of in that Full House episode, with some future late 1990s-early 2000s pop stars (I further use to pretend that me and those future late 1990s-early 2000s pop stars hung out together off set of those shows when filming was not going on). Similar to how I use to pretend that during the 1996 NFL season, the Jets beat the Eagles, Oilers and the Colts at the Meadowlands.

However, unlike those pretending examples above, I will continue to pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election, until the day I die. 

However, if I am asked to share my view of whether I believe that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen, even though I pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election, I have to state my true view on that question (that the Democrats and Joe Biden stolen that election). The reason is lying is wrong, and while I 24/7 pretend that the 2020 Presidential election was won 100 percent fair and square by the Democrats and Joe Biden, I would be being as dishonest as the Democrats and Joe Biden were in stealing that election if I didn't state that my true view on that question (that the Democrats and Joe Biden stole that election)

I would never try to stop the transfer of power but I support the congress people trying to stop the certification of the election results in 2020 to ask for a recount (ideally that objection should have been done privately in December 2020 like it was done or would have been done privately in December 2016 if due to the opposition to certify the 2016 election victory of Donald Trump but the so called sedition caucus was right to what they did none the less). But I support Republicans who voted against objecting to the election results in Arizona and Pennsylvania

I believe that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. But there are alternate realities where Barack Obama's clones were born in Kenya (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse).  Even though Barack Obama was born in the US (and spent most of his childhood and youth growing up in the US, albeit off the mainland in a very new state -Hawaii) , he did spend a big chunk of his childhood and youth living in Indonesia which means, that while he is a legal US citizen his whole life, he isn't as firmly entrenched in American culture as people who spent more time or their whole childhood and youth living in the US since Obama lived in Indonesia for many years as a child and youth.    

Even if Barack Obama was born in Kenya, I believe he should have been eligible to be President since his mother was a lifelong American citizen and in Judaism, to be considered 'fully Jewish' all you need is for your mother to be Jewish, so why not apply that here too (even though they aren't Jewish).  The birther thing could have backfired if the Republicans got their way with it since Patriot and AmericanFirster Ted Cruz ,unlike Barack Obama, was born in a foreign country.

White Replacement Theory is a myth. But isn't a myth is there a rightfully demographics changes via migration (more migrants the merrier, bless their hearts) and that is a factor (along with millions of other factors) in Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition winning elections . Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition yield to overkill mass migration (if that is an exaggeration by hard Right border-hawks I take this back) and mass illegal immigration 

Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition are, rightfully or wrongfully so pro illegal immigration for political reasons (even though I wrote below isn't 100 percent correct, as changing Hispanic voting patterns demonstrate). 

Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition are more likely than our red green brown coalition to protect illegal immigrants (which is a good thing but for shady reasons) and allow them to stay here and it very well could be because they know somewhere inside or systematically that illegal migrants are (or potentially more) more likely to vote the way we don’t want them to vote. 

Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition betray this line of thinking by them by making it easier for illegal immigrants to vote when illegals probably should not be allowed to vote until they become citizens or citizenish (i.e through Amnesty, Path to Citizenships, DACAs etc). 

They further do this by trying to get rid of voter ids. (if Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition didn’t heavily restrict all types of migration many many years ago, they wouldn’t need to make up for that in spades now which leads to intrusive and unsustaining mass illegal immigration)

In return those illegal immigrants out of gratefulness (whether real , perceived or imaginary) by and large vote Democrat, toxic Center right Republican, RadCon (radical Conservative) than vote the way we want them to vote

This does not cause our country to be non white, it causes our country to be more non red green brown coalition colors 

This might even help the Democrats in particular and more so who are outside of our red green brown coalition

In Texas for example, Bill Richardson said that there used to be more open this agreement between the Democrats and illegals but over time, the Democrats made it more and more covert as to not let this get out. I don’t think there is anything sinister or official like that now with illegals and Democrats, but even the appearance of that whether right or wrong is concerning 

In 2003, John Judis and Ruy Teixeira wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority. In this book, they said that Democrats were building a new electoral coalition where white America is supplanted by multicultural (multiracial and multi ethnic) society.  

Nine years later, in 2012, The Washington Post wrote "The story of this election will be all about demographics... Rather than reverting to the older, whiter, more male version (of America's electorate) Republicans had hoped for, it continues to be defined by what Ron Brownstein has called the 'coalition of the ascendant' -- minorities, young voters, and college educated whites, particularly women"

In 2013, the Center for American Progress said, "Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future."

But it's so obvious this is the case, that it is an insult to Americans to deny there is something, no matter how ‘insignificant’ to this. Joe Biden told BIPOC after he 'won' the 2020 Presidential Election 'you had my back now I got yours's. It's the same with Democrats/Liberals and illegals. But I commend the Democrat politicians loyalty to their voting base

Donald Trump’s years of exploiting illegal migrants to do labor for him  helped him get Latino swing voters due to the Latino community’s loyalty for such work, ditto for Mitt Romney, Marjorie Greene (who exploits illegal migrants to work for her at her small business who then in turn become loyal shills for her)

The Democrats want to tie Republican positions with White power (though not that I can blame the Democrats for doing that no matter how seemingly inaccurate it is due to the Richard Spencer Alt right infiltration of the MAGA Alt right in 2016 and the Democrats realizing that Republicans move further and further right recently due to the liberals growing more ‘extreme’ causing many Republicans to have nowhere right to go but alt right).  

But none to less, the Democrats do this to take voters away from our alliance’s candidates.  It is smart politics but it gets old fast.  Deceitful politics don't care about the truth, a small but harsh fraction of polemics use all tools to destroy us (and we do the same but not quite as much)

As great as the 1964 Civil Rights act was, it caused a slippery slope with workers who are drugees , workers who cause workplace discrimination and divisiveness (which prevents workers uniting to overthrow capitalism) , illegal migrants (who don’t meet any amnesty conditions), pedos , hetereo and gay couples who can’t get a room, the CRT in schools etc. It also might wrongly cause a Christian worker (not owner) who leaves work to avoid baking a cake for a gay couple’s wedding in danger of being arrested for ‘discrimination’

Moreover it lead to equity ‘quotas’, which go against the very nature of that act

We have to amend the 1964 Civil Rights act to either fix that or prevent slippery sloping that would go beyond those things into extreme left territory .