Science issues

 Science

Science and Pyschology are not infallibe and they are wrong at least some of the time (they are HUMANS not Gods). Scientists and shrinks are right most of the time. Science is not static and it changes. Science is fluid

I am scientodific.  I accept the scientific method

Climate change/eco

I support the environment, natural resources and ecological conservation  

In nature we see a needed connectedness and interrelationship which show us that all things are of equal importance to the functioning of the Earth, plants-shrubs, stones, nothing but humans are the top and nothing is at the bottom, there is one single unit below humans. We have a synergy with our lands 

But we still need to be at one with nature. We have to save our forests, so our ovens don't become cold when it gets colds and so our life continues to thrive on this planet.

We need to protect our forests and nature from deforestation, invasive species (which are unnatural), and from urban expansion and exploitation so nature always has a place for us. We also need to make sure people who destroy such natural environments don't do so and to possibly have them move to other areas as to reclaim such areas if they are truly beyond saving.  

Too much mass migration and illegal immigration might have ecological drawbacks. Some people say that too much migration and illegal immigration causes damage to the environment and contributes to climate change:  https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/28050006/SHIVA_Mehdi_Final_20180815a.pdf    Since I am not a scientist I can't tell if they are right or not but its worth a read  

These drawbacks are drawbacks that leads to more expansion which leads to nature and forests being replaced with towns ,cities, roads, highways, taking away that beautiful nature and forests 

I half heartily conditionally support something between Eco Alter Isolationism and Eco Night Watchman’s State (19th. Century Britain Splendid Isolationism) , along with Eco Protectionism by the US and some of their allies 

The US and some of their allies would use something between Eco Isolationism and Eco Night Watchman’s State (19th. Century Britain Splendid Isolationism) along with Eco Protectionism toward countries that don’t take steps to curb the eco system/environmental damage and climate change. These measures would not be removed until those countries take climate change and protection of the eco system more seriously 

We need to use non liberal and non globalizationist in our ecological fight to preserve our environment and planet   

I support a green revolution against over industrialization so we can have some assemblage of our pre industrialized world (since over industrializing the planet is sort of like industrial imperialism and materialistic/first world paternalism and I am against those type of things . 

I am sensitive to the sorrow of far left (actually far right)  Eco Terrorists since I am myself sensitive and intuitive to seeing with forests being destroyed (trees and rocks are living creatures), housing developments and commercial areas replacing open land (like what sadly happened in my hometown in New Jersey and in Florida), and similar concerns 

Some of these themes were even touched upon in the Shining as the Native spirits haunted the Overlook hotel and its guests (like Jack and his family) as payback for the Europe and later the US’s industrial imperialism on Native American lands

Those type of things strip away what makes those areas unique. 

However , I condemn the Eco Terrorist’s violence and terrorism as it makes things worse and backfires

Instead of violence and terrorism, Eco Terrorists should become Eco Anarchists who are something between Classic Anarchists-Anarchist Synthesists and Insurrectionary Anarchism .They should also follow the Queer Anarchist creed of possibly , as a last resort doing crime to save our ecology and environment  (but petty crime that Queer Anarchists do not violence or terrorism)

We humans should be connected spiritually to nature as we are a product of our nature and the environment. We should be Pan International Environmentalists/Green Eco Advocacists to preserve nature as it has a role in molding us into what we are today. 

I sometimes am tempted to advocate for our government to use militant (though ideally militant moderate my twist lib con pop) enforcement of environmental measures over the needs and freedoms of its citizens to save our ecology and environment 

Maybe to save our planet , our government should require us to sacrifice our interests to the wellness of the land (splendid Earth) and aura of nature. Maybe something like Degrowth  similar concept .  Maybe we should also consider colonizing other planets or moons to help reduce our ecological footprint on Earth 

If our planet continues to deteriorate and decay through eco and environmental decay and damage 

Maybe as a radical change we can form  autonomous, multipolar  and green societies to really help reverse such damage to our planet , and to protect the environment and ultimately the planet

I am against the government and social media companies censoring and blocking people who criticize green energy transition.  Such actions by the government and social media companies is FASCIST authoritarian censorship and is against the values that our country was founded on. That is shutting down free speech  by stifling legit criticism of the government and I will not allow the government to do that. I swear to god

I believe the Superconducting Super Collider should have been built and stayed open

I am against government funding of agricultural subsidies

I am ok with responsible climate engineering

We cannot stop climate change effectively unless we replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views . So we need to replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views to really fight climate change by creating a world where its easier to do so 

I support somewhat expanding the EPA while having slightly more diversity of opinions within it. The EPA helped identify and clean up the toxic mess of my hometown area and used a great unique system; superfund sites, to do so, so they have my endorsement  I do feel the EPA should work closer with the locals and make them take control of their projects sooner rather than later to avoid being seen as big gov

Enviromental Racism is a nonsense and a myth. There is no such thing as enviormental racism.

I believe in Climate Change but I don't believe that Colonial, racist or patriarchal systems created or fueled it. Climate Change is not a manner of human rights. I am against Greta Thunberg's radical views on Climate Change.  I do want to know the opinions of the 5 percenters of mainstream scientists who don't believe in man made climate change/climate change and what their views on this are ,not to change my view but to give them the dignity of knowing that despite me disagreeing with them I acknowledge their fringe viewpoints on climate change.

Climate Change will never cause temperatures to rise beyond 5.4F.  The Tail End risks of Climate Change will never happen and all evidence supports me on this

Climate Change Apocalypse predictions if they were real (but basically are not, see below) may really be pointing to the Biblical Apocalypse (ie using the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse imagery).  

We should follow the bible and be stewards for Earth even if said stewards don't believe in Climate Change.

I basically don't believe that the Climate Change Apocalypse type of climate change will happen.

I reject Deep Adaption and Jem Bernall's Deep Adaption. Deep Adaption climate predictions and Jem Bernall's climate predictions are nonsense and psuedoscience.

I am against climate change deniers being hated on for their skepticism.  In a few hundred or thousand years, the future history will judge whether they were right or wrong.

I am against plastic bag bans, paper straw bans. I am against the Nord Steam pipeline being built. 

I support the Keystone Pipeline being built

I support increased logging on federal lands

I support the use of Nuclear energy, and Wind Energy

I am a Radical Environmentalist, but I prefer using nature  as a gateway to its creator -God. This is an effective way of destroying Capitalism (especially Neoliberalism, Social Liberal Capitalism, crony Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism), patriarchy, and stopping globalizationism which would ubite people and repair senseless damage to nature at the same time. Plus it can lead people to God and living in a Book of Acts Christian type of world

I feel Radical Environmentalism is good because its bold and cuts through bureaucracy and feels more natural and less offensive to anti environmentalists 

Space

I support sending humans into space which is why I hope NASA brings the Space Shuttle program back. I hope one day space travel becomes as common as airline travel.

Biology/Chemistry/Phsyics

I generally agree with Daniel Dennett’s critique Sam Harris’ views on free will but I believe Harris makes convincing counter arguements that I haven’t heard a good enough rebuttal for. Regardless, that book Free Will does not undermine morality or take way the importance of political and social freedom

I pragmatically believe that something between Progressive Creationism and Intelligent Design is real since God purposely hid scientific proof of his work from the learned (scientists) so that babes (believers) would believe him based on faith and reason instead of science and materialist findings. Luke from the Gospel of Luke was one of the best medical/science people ever and he believed in something between Progressive Creationism and Intelligent Design.

I am apolitical on pandemic politics and I ignore all politics things related to it but since I wrote so many views here i say why not write about that stuff too so here are some of the few left right views on it as noted below:

I fully support Piers Corbyn's right to protest vaccine at that clinic in Britain in 2021 and I feel it was an amusing and bold move. But if i was there, I would have literally thrown him out of that clinic

I would never do or even encourage this but if right wingers who are anti vaxxers want to get back at pro vaxxers for their mandates and restrictions that they enforced during the pandemic (especially in 2020 and 2021) the best way to do that would be for the right wing anti vaxxers to live (and to get others to live) as 'unfree' (ymmv) and restricted post pandemic as they lived in 2020 and 2021 during the pandemic. 

Which means push for lockdowns, travel restrictions, social distancing and possibly face coverings being a permanent thing (this time for non health reasons) while they themselves self isolate, social distance themselves in public all the time, avoid any place indoors or outdoors with crowds that are large enough to violate said anti vaxxers self imposed social distancing mandate, stop traveling far or travel restricted, don't have anyone over their houses (and vice versa) or only do so if it would have been approved during the pandemic etc. 

This is not necessarily out of spite,  its just for consistency sake (can't magically tell anti vaxxers to go back to normal so this hammers that point home) and to hammer the point home to anti vaxxers that while they couldn't stop the government and their henchmen from taking away their 'freedoms' (ymmv) during the pandemic the anti vaxxers can however stop the pro vaxx crowd from brainwashing them and others to go back to normal after the pandemic by living as restricted post pandemic as they did during the pandemic for the rest of their lives since they can't mandate anti vaxxers the opposite way of how they mandated them during the pandemic (ie they can't force anti vaxxers to travel or to not self isolate or to have tons of people over at their houses etc).  

Plus if doing the above things shuts up those SJW anti vaxxers than that's goo dtoo

Sara Haines is wrong. Face coverings will NOT and should NOT be a permeant thing in the US or anywhere.  However I am against laws that require people to show their faces in public.  I actually want to see a lot of people wear costume masks in the future in public (but not in October), to make something good come out of the face covering mandates. 

I am fine with the Mises Caucus’s stance on lockdowns

Jimmy Dore’s pandemic views have a few broken clock moments here and there (though maybe more since unlike Jimmy, I don’t follow it closely)  and maybe in a decade or decades from now a lot of what he said about it might be confirmed to be in the ballpark of being plausible if not truthiness . 

I somewhat support a lot of what RFK Jr said about the pandemic

Since early Februrary 2022 I believe that Nancy Pelosi's face covering mandate for the House of Reps should be stopped and no one in the house of reps should be requried to cover their faces

I do believe a small fraction (ymmv/give or take) of anti vaxxers think they are being persecuted and censored and if they believe it, whether or not that is true, that is sad. 

I believe that if people from Earth could have teleported to countries on other planets in other galaxies that have intelligent life beings on them in 2020, 2021 that those people should have done so and done so without social distancing, without covering their face, even if they weren't vaccinated and without isolating themselves (even if they tested positive for covid before going and even if the went back and forth between Earth and those planets multiple times throughout 2020 and 2021).Aliens on other planets are immune to all of our viruses since aliens are not human

I strongly morally and cautiously support the Canadian truckers in their protest but even if I didn’t I still would be against Justin Trudeau using the emergency act on protestors and I still would be  against his government going after bank accounts of protestors and supporters and similar underhanded things just as I am now. However, I don't believe he is a dictator as saying he is a dictator is an insult to all real dictators, but his actions do make me believe he is almot in the realm of being a super Authoartarian. Justin Trudeau was wrong to smear the Canadian freedom convoy protestors as bigots  

VLADIMIR PUTIN DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CANADIAN TRUCKER PROTEST AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A FOOL

I believe in Reincarnation

There is an afterlife after people die and most scientists agree or say they don't know

Psychology

Psycho Analysis is a real science (except when used by wokeists then its psuedo science) and anyone who says otherwise is a fake scientist.

Etc