Taboo issues

 I am between strongly against and having zero tolerance for Polygamy, Polyamory and open marriages. I don't want anyone to engage in Polygamy, Polyamory or open marriages ever.

I want Polygamy, Polyamory and open marriages to be illegal forever. Monogamy is 100000x times better.

I am against Pedophilia being legal and I think that Pedophila is evil, wrong and extremely bad. We need to get tough love tougher with pedophiles not less tougher on them (but still realize their sin is no worse or better than any other sin and that they need Christ to break free and in a way which strongly influences them to get help and change but faslely makes them think that its their decision alone to change and get help). Mainstream techniques that currently are used to cure pedophiles should be fused with Christian Assemblies of God inspired values to be used on pedophiles (voluntarily) so they have no excuse. 

I fully condemn everything in that liberal pro pedo USA Today article on pedophiles. That article is nonsense and pro pedo garbage. Pedophiles aren't born that way and based on my SBNR exploraseeking Christian Assemblies of God views, I believe that Pedophiles just thinking pedophilic things without acting on them is a sin since God says thinking of doing sinful acts is the same as doing sinful acts (we should all apply this thinking to our own lives too and not even think of doing sinful acts) 

My other views on Pedophiles matches the current Paleoconservative views on them but with a smidge of intutiveness and common sense pity added to said views)

In a more ideal world (ymmv), we'd teleport a lot to most pedophiles from the US who are currently in prison or on parole (or who are close to being put back in prison) to Emerald City in the Oswald State Correctional Facility in the late 1990s/early 2000s in an alternate reality where the HBO tv show Oz is real. 

This way those pedos can be dealt with by the anti pedo Oz inmates (in that reality and time period) the same way that that pedo inmate was dealt with by those same anti pedo inmates on Oz (though we'd give those pedos we were tranferring to the late 1990s/early 2000s Oswald State Correctional Facility's Emerald City in that fictional reality a fighting chance by trying to give them advice and training before we teleport them so they have as much of a chance to survive and at times thrive in that prison like how Beecher survived and thrived on Oz during the show's run). Moreover those pedos would have Sister Pete and Father Makula to give them counciling to further help them break free.

They'd only be in that place for a year or possibly more (keep in mind inmates in Oz's Emerald city have a lot more freedom than normal inmates here do). If they survive that, they will be released and can live anywhere they want in that alternate reality version of the US that the HBO tv show Oz takes place in, assuming they find a job, get a place to live etc like other people do in that alternate reality version of the US in that time period.

Then those pedophiles can continue to fight for their so called 'rights' but in that alternate reality version of the US that the HBO tv show Oz takes place in and they'll always be 20 something years behind us in our reality since besides teleporting them to that fictional alternate reality where the HBO tv show Oz is real, we also sent them back in time (to the late 1990s/early 2000s).  If they get their rights in that alternate reality version of the US that they demand here, better there than here. Out of sight (or out of reality and time period) out of mind.

Some conservatives who aren't pedophiles get falsely smeared as being pedophiles or Conservatives as a whole are falsely stereotyped as pedophiles and those stereotypings need to end since those are blatant lies and extreme defamation. I would never do that to Liberals or Liberalism as a whole so they shouldn't do that to Conservatives.

I am very much against Pornography and I want Pornography to be illegal . Pornography cheapens love,is disgusting, immoral, exploitative and is wrong. We should spread the Feminists anti pornography views. They rightfully recognize the horrors of how pornography is harmful to women and leads to increased violence against women. Feminists knows the appalling tendency of pornography to use coercion on women (physical, psychological, economical etc) to do Pornography, even if women are seen to be having a good time (which they aren’t because pornography objectifies women). Feminists know women aren’t there by choice, that ‘happiness’ is not natural but coerced and artificial and like feminists, that bothers me.

We need to get the word out that Pornography is wrong and must be abolished because it is patriarchal propaganda.

I am fine with BDSM 

I am against fetishography and I want it to be illegal forever

I am against legalizing public sex. People should never be allowed to have sex in public ever.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Left Ro

Left Rothbardian  Left Rothbardian is a belief that hat property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. This puts a claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property. The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this. It heavily advocates for the respect of private property as a natural right which it derives from the right of self ownership. However it does not see property ...
Read more

My political views that I have

I am a Neoclassical   Libertarian -Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention  Libe r al  S oci a list )  I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (like Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher etc), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus-AmericaFirst Republicans As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That...
Read more

Ethnic/Racial views

 Ethnicity/race I support the right of self determination for these groups of the US: blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics-Latinos, Hawaiians, Asians, Arabs and Pacific Islanders While I morally (moral as in moral victory) support Affirmative Action, I want color blind hiring and gender blind hiring to replace Quota hiring such as Affirmative Action at some point in the next few decades.  I feel Affirmative Action and quotas may negatively effect BIPOC+ confidence and motivation by making it seem that they aren't good enough to get those jobs without Affirmative Action or quotas. There are no safeguards for Affirmative Action and quotas for some of the BIPOC+ who get fired or quit do to being underqualified for their jobs. This article  generally reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity. Some of my other views on race-ethnicity match the views of BGJ’s views on race-ethnicity I echo what Judge John Roberts said on this: "The way to stop discrimina...
Read more