Voluntary

United Nations on population resettling

“Historical cases reflect a now-foregone belief that population transfer may serve as an option for resolving various types of conflict, within a country or between countries. The agreement of recognized States may provide one criterion for the authorization of the final terms of conflict resolution. However, the cardinal principle of "voluntariness" is seldom satisfied, regardless of the objective of the transfer. For the transfer to comply with human rights standards as developed, prospective transferees must have an option to remain in their homes if they prefer"   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Left Ro

Left Rothbardian  Left Rothbardian is a belief that hat property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. This puts a claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property. The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this. It heavily advocates for the respect of private property as a natural right which it derives from the right of self ownership. However it does not see property ...
Read more

My political views that I have

I am a Neoclassical   Libertarian -Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention  Libe r al  S oci a list )  I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (like Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher etc), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus-AmericaFirst Republicans As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That...
Read more

Ethnic/Racial views

 Ethnicity/race I support the right of self determination for these groups of the US: blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics-Latinos, Hawaiians, Asians, Arabs and Pacific Islanders While I morally (moral as in moral victory) support Affirmative Action, I want color blind hiring and gender blind hiring to replace Quota hiring such as Affirmative Action at some point in the next few decades.  I feel Affirmative Action and quotas may negatively effect BIPOC+ confidence and motivation by making it seem that they aren't good enough to get those jobs without Affirmative Action or quotas. There are no safeguards for Affirmative Action and quotas for some of the BIPOC+ who get fired or quit do to being underqualified for their jobs. This article  generally reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity. Some of my other views on race-ethnicity match the views of BGJ’s views on race-ethnicity I echo what Judge John Roberts said on this: "The way to stop discrimina...
Read more