jcaskrjslsek

Polemic I am a  Bleeding Heart Libertarian -Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention  Libe r al  S oci a list ) I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus, AmericaFirst Republicans As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That will...

United Nations on population resettling “Historical cases reflect a now-foregone belief that population transfer may serve as an option for resolving various types of conflict, within a country or between countries. The agreement of recognized States may provide one criterion for the authorization of the final terms of conflict resolution. However, the cardinal principle of "voluntariness" is seldom satisfied, regardless of the objective of the transfer. For the transfer to comply with human rights standards as developed, prospective transferees must have an option to remain in their homes if they prefer"   

 I am very open to not so deep down inside being radically passive lean provisional support on Pan Secessionism ( only  if it can be done in a diverse, inclusive way like the site below says) Ideally it would be as diverse and inclusive as Canada was under Pierre Trudeau but if it was as diverse and inclusive as my hometown in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, I would be between passive and being able to live with that.  This is what Pan Secessionism is:  Statement of purpose. : https://attackthesystem.com/statement-of-purpose/                                        Diversity and inclusiveness:  https://attackthesystem.com/unity-in-diversity-and-against-war-and-statism/ ,  https://attackthesystem.com/americans-for-self-determination/     https://attackthesystem.com/?s=inclusive The City state idea from Attack the System is interesting because it allo...

  https://centlizedjxxgr.blogspot.com/2022/08/kifestyle-activism.html

 FROM Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire#Socialism Gary Chartier offers an understanding of property rights as contingent yet tightly constrained social strategies, reflective of the importance of multiple, overlapping rationales for separate ownership and of natural law principles of practical reasonableness, defending robust yet non-absolute protections for these rights in a manner similar to that employed by David Hume.[96] This account is distinguished both from Lockean and neo-Lockean views which deduce property rights from the idea of self-ownership and from consequentialist accounts that might license widespread ad hoc interference with the possessions of groups and individuals.[97] Chartier uses this account to ground a clear statement of the natural law basis for the view that solidaristic wealth redistribution by individual persons is often morally required, but as a response by individuals and grass-roots networks to particular circumstances rath...

Left Rothbardian  Left Rothbardian is a belief that hat property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. This puts a claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property. The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this. It heavily advocates for the respect of private property as a natural right which it derives from the right of self ownership. However it does not see property ...