jcaskrjslsek

I am part Jewish and pro co-exist. I am a Post Zionist I am ok with Palestinian Nationalism I feel that  Zionism has fulfilled its ideological mission with the formation of the modern Israel in 1948, In my opinion,  Zionist ideology should therefore be considered at an end.  This has been evident since the Oslo Accords.  Israel should no longer declare itself to be a Jewish democratic state and should instead focus on its democratic aspects. This movement seeks to create social equality in Israel in a way that meshes with my views in this blog Questions that need an answer: Is Israel a safe haven for the Jewish nation? Are there any other places in the world which the Jews' conditions are better from a historical point of view? (like North America?) Is it actually possible to have both a Jewish state and a democracy? Should Israel become a state of all its citizens? Is the Israeli–Palestinian conflict fully black and white? Did Israel always maximize its efforts to o...

Polemic I am a  Bleeding Heart Libertarian -Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention  Libe r al  S oci a list ) I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus, AmericaFirst Republicans As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That will...

United Nations on population resettling “Historical cases reflect a now-foregone belief that population transfer may serve as an option for resolving various types of conflict, within a country or between countries. The agreement of recognized States may provide one criterion for the authorization of the final terms of conflict resolution. However, the cardinal principle of "voluntariness" is seldom satisfied, regardless of the objective of the transfer. For the transfer to comply with human rights standards as developed, prospective transferees must have an option to remain in their homes if they prefer"   

 I am very open to not so deep down inside being radically passive lean provisional support on Pan Secessionism ( only  if it can be done in a diverse, inclusive way like the site below says) Ideally it would be as diverse and inclusive as Canada was under Pierre Trudeau but if it was as diverse and inclusive as my hometown in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, I would be between passive and being able to live with that.  This is what Pan Secessionism is:  Statement of purpose. : https://attackthesystem.com/statement-of-purpose/                                        Diversity and inclusiveness:  https://attackthesystem.com/unity-in-diversity-and-against-war-and-statism/ ,  https://attackthesystem.com/americans-for-self-determination/     https://attackthesystem.com/?s=inclusive The City state idea from Attack the System is interesting because it allo...

  https://centlizedjxxgr.blogspot.com/2022/08/kifestyle-activism.html

 FROM Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire#Socialism Gary Chartier offers an understanding of property rights as contingent yet tightly constrained social strategies, reflective of the importance of multiple, overlapping rationales for separate ownership and of natural law principles of practical reasonableness, defending robust yet non-absolute protections for these rights in a manner similar to that employed by David Hume.[96] This account is distinguished both from Lockean and neo-Lockean views which deduce property rights from the idea of self-ownership and from consequentialist accounts that might license widespread ad hoc interference with the possessions of groups and individuals.[97] Chartier uses this account to ground a clear statement of the natural law basis for the view that solidaristic wealth redistribution by individual persons is often morally required, but as a response by individuals and grass-roots networks to particular circumstances rath...

Left Rothbardian  Left Rothbardian is a belief that hat property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. This puts a claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property. The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this. It heavily advocates for the respect of private property as a natural right which it derives from the right of self ownership. However it does not see property ...

  https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternateHistory/comments/g0chr8/choose_your_favorite_alternate_germany/ Got this idea from an Alternate History website  . There are alternate histories according to that reddit where there was a Restored Kaiserreich who had heavy DNVP influence (like post-WW1 Italy) in the 1930s and 1940s Germany (in alternate histories where their only opposition was the KPD and Social Democrats in Germany) and they allowed Jewish people to serve in that Restored Kaiserreich that hadheavy DNVP influence 

 I have no issues with Conspiracy Theories. I see Conspiracy Theories as creative fan fiction which are used to help some conservatives get over political things they are not happy about. These 'fan fictions' while false, can help us shine a light on some liberals and Democrats so they really don't do such sinister things in real life. Other planets/realities etc I strongly do not believe that extraterrestrial White adjacent privilege for extraterrestrial white adjacents on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes is real.   Some people on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes feel that diversity quotas privilege extraterrestrial BIPOC adjacent groups on those planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes more than extraterrestrial white adjacents on their planet,  so on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes the privilege rhetoric boomerangs (not that is does on our planet because it doesn’t but it hap...