jcaskrjslsek

I am part Jewish and pro co-exist. I am a Post Zionist I am ok with Palestinian Nationalism I feel that  Zionism has fulfilled its ideological mission with the formation of the modern Israel in 1948, In my opinion,  Zionist ideology should therefore be considered at an end.  This has been evident since the Oslo Accords.  Israel should no longer declare itself to be a Jewish democratic state and should instead focus on its democratic aspects. This movement seeks to create social equality in Israel in a way that meshes with my views in this blog Questions that need an answer: Is Israel a safe haven for the Jewish nation? Are there any other places in the world which the Jews' conditions are better from a historical point of view? (like North America?) Is it actually possible to have both a Jewish state and a democracy? Should Israel become a state of all its citizens? Is the Israeli–Palestinian conflict fully black and white? Did Israel always maximize its efforts to o...

Polemic I am a  Bleeding Heart Libertarian -Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention  Libe r al  S oci a list ) I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus, AmericaFirst Republicans As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That will...

United Nations on population resettling “Historical cases reflect a now-foregone belief that population transfer may serve as an option for resolving various types of conflict, within a country or between countries. The agreement of recognized States may provide one criterion for the authorization of the final terms of conflict resolution. However, the cardinal principle of "voluntariness" is seldom satisfied, regardless of the objective of the transfer. For the transfer to comply with human rights standards as developed, prospective transferees must have an option to remain in their homes if they prefer"   

 I am very open to not so deep down inside being radically passive lean provisional support on Pan Secessionism ( only  if it can be done in a diverse, inclusive way like the site below says) Ideally it would be as diverse and inclusive as Canada was under Pierre Trudeau but if it was as diverse and inclusive as my hometown in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, I would be between passive and being able to live with that.  This is what Pan Secessionism is:  Statement of purpose. : https://attackthesystem.com/statement-of-purpose/                                        Diversity and inclusiveness:  https://attackthesystem.com/unity-in-diversity-and-against-war-and-statism/ ,  https://attackthesystem.com/americans-for-self-determination/     https://attackthesystem.com/?s=inclusive The City state idea from Attack the System is interesting because it allo...

  https://centlizedjxxgr.blogspot.com/2022/08/kifestyle-activism.html

 FROM Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire#Socialism Gary Chartier offers an understanding of property rights as contingent yet tightly constrained social strategies, reflective of the importance of multiple, overlapping rationales for separate ownership and of natural law principles of practical reasonableness, defending robust yet non-absolute protections for these rights in a manner similar to that employed by David Hume.[96] This account is distinguished both from Lockean and neo-Lockean views which deduce property rights from the idea of self-ownership and from consequentialist accounts that might license widespread ad hoc interference with the possessions of groups and individuals.[97] Chartier uses this account to ground a clear statement of the natural law basis for the view that solidaristic wealth redistribution by individual persons is often morally required, but as a response by individuals and grass-roots networks to particular circumstances rath...

Left Rothbardian  Left Rothbardian is a belief that hat property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. This puts a claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property. The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this. It heavily advocates for the respect of private property as a natural right which it derives from the right of self ownership. However it does not see property ...

  https://www.reddit.com/r/AlternateHistory/comments/g0chr8/choose_your_favorite_alternate_germany/ Got this idea from an Alternate History website  . There are alternate histories according to that reddit where there was a Restored Kaiserreich who had heavy DNVP influence (like post-WW1 Italy) in the 1930s and 1940s Germany (in alternate histories where their only opposition was the KPD and Social Democrats in Germany) and they allowed Jewish people to serve in that Restored Kaiserreich that hadheavy DNVP influence 

 I have no issues with Conspiracy Theories. I see Conspiracy Theories as creative fan fiction which are used to help some conservatives get over political things they are not happy about. These 'fan fictions' while false, can help us shine a light on some liberals and Democrats so they really don't do such sinister things in real life. Other planets/realities etc I strongly do not believe that extraterrestrial White adjacent privilege for extraterrestrial white adjacents on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes is real.   Some people on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes feel that diversity quotas privilege extraterrestrial BIPOC adjacent groups on those planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes more than extraterrestrial white adjacents on their planet,  so on other planets in other solar systems, galaxies or universes the privilege rhetoric boomerangs (not that is does on our planet because it doesn’t but it hap...

 It is ok that some relationships (like close acquaintances and monogamous relationships) are exclusionary to other people. There is no bright line rule regarding permissible and impermissible exclusion. Ideally (though not a deal breaker), when particular intimate sub communities justifiably exclude someone—for the simple reason that they would cease to be the kinds of communities they are if they weren’t strictly (lime limited in size), there is clearly room for the excluded person in the broader community of which they are components. Ideally they would be welcomed/included there When justifiable exclusion occurs, it should ideally not reflect false beliefs about or unreasonable reactions to some group of which the excluded person belongs.  For example, perhaps A acts reasonably in deciding not to marry B because of vital differences in the ways in which B and A understand the nature of marriage, differences that might come to light from B’s membership in a certain group wi...

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/01/08/how-democratic-plantation-became-one-conservatives-favorite-slurs/?utm_term=.0275fa1041f9 https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-forgotten-history-of-black-republicans https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/06/18/terry-crews-slams-biden-warns-against-black-supremacy-n545003 https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/20/black-trump-supporter-at-tulsa-rally-fires-back-at-angry-leftists-racist-jabs-ive-never-been-on-a-plantation-936659

 I am a Spiritual but not religious (including being a Christian-Assemblies of God exploraseeker) and Theological I support making English the official language of the US government I sympathize with Donald Trump's Garden of American Heroes idea as I feel it would have made up for the statues that were destroyed or taken down (to avoid being destroyed) in 2020 etc and I approve of most of the names on that statue list. But I am strongly against The National Garden of American Heroes being created.  The federal government (including our Presidents) should not tell us who our historical heroes should be and should not force these names upon us. Who decides who is great? What right does our government have to dictate to us who was 'worthy' enough to get a statue?  This is the US, not CCP China. We already have tasteful ways to honor our greats (Walk of Fame, naming things after heroes etc). Moreover statues of our 'heroes' continue to be erected, but thankfully without...

FAQ Q) What does 'forth political position' or 'fifth political position' or '6th political position mean? A)  A forth, fifth or 6th political position is a political stance/position on issues that is neither support, against, neutral, liberal-progressive, conservative, centrist, indifferent, apolitical or 3rd political position but a hypothetical, political stance/political position that is as opposite of support and against as support and against are opposite of each other and is as opposite of liberal-progressive and conservative as liberal-progressive and conservative are opposite of each other.  Forth political position, fifth political position and 6th political position on political issues have never been seen before in our universe but those political stances/positions exists on political issues in other universes with different laws of nature than in our universe (just like there are primary colors that have never been seen in our universe but exist in othe...

 Blog navigation All of my political views unsorted FAQ Animal rights Children/Disabled issues Drugs and Criminal issues Ethnic racial issues Fiscal issues Gun rights Identity politics SJW cancel culture Immigration issues LGBTQ+ views Misc issues Military wars International issues Voting issues Science issues Taboo Womens and Mens issues misc Polemic Lifestyle Anarchy Out of box memes

 The government should not fund universal pre school. I am against colleges removing studies of ‘dead white males’ from course of Western history and similar studies I support some slight decentralization of education. I am ok with opt outs on testing and reimagining the Boards of Regents I support expanded work based learning systems for high school students so they are prepared for life after high school/college/grad school and since it adds more work for them in school sort of making up for them being deprived of working more hours in school. I am also open to a K-10 model reducing the span of school to get young people ready to work We need nuanced ideas to help teachers do their jobs without worrying about the left firing them for not towing the line. To do this, we must focus on restorative justice and building community relations We must help students thrive in school. To do so we must increase funding for vocational training, socio emotional learning. This would include, tr...

 I support Animal Welfare. Animals shouldn't have their fur be used for any purpose (they should keep their fur). It traumatizes and depresses me seeing images of animals on fur farms. Ditto for animals being used for testing and factory farms. We have to protect them. I support Germany adding Animal welfare to their constitution and Great apes getting rights I pity people who want animals to have equal rights to humans since seeing animals being lower than humans feels like hierarchal and 'speciesist’ (like animals are dehumanized by not being equal to humans). If I was in a world that was as conservative as 16th century Earth or 17th century Earth I would be more open to Biocentrism But in the bible, God tells us that humans are above animals and have more value than animals but we are to protect them.  “Likewise Luke, records Jesus telling His disciples, “Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? And not one of them is forgotten before God. Why, even the hairs of your hea...

Good article by Brandon Smith I think one of the most bizarre social developments of the past 10 years in the US has been the slow but steady shift of the political left as supposed defenders of free speech to enemies of free speech. The level of mental gymnastics on display by leftists to justify their attacks on freedom and the 1st Amendment is bewildering. So much so that I begin to question if liberals and leftists ever actually had any respect for 1st Amendment rights to begin with? Or, maybe the only freedom they cared about all along was the freedom to watch pornography… One can see the steady progression of this war on speech and ideas, and the end game is predictable: Is anyone really that surprised that the Biden Administration is implementing a Ministry of Truth in the form of the DHS Disinformation Governance Board? Can we just accept the reality at this point that leftists are evil and their efforts feed into an agenda of authoritarianism? Is there any evidence to the cont...