My political views that I have
I am a Neoclassical Libertarian-Paleolibertarian, Classical Liberal and Social Democrat (Third Way and by extention Liberal Socialist)
I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish ‘Grifters’ (like Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher etc), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus-AmericaFirst Republicans
As it is now, my loyalty is to the above groups
I would like to make the US etc as conservative as it was in the 1980s (with a twist) which I hope can happen via the Red-green-brown alliance
Once I accomplish that, I will then make the US etc more liberal then it would have been if I didn't make our country 1980s conservative but with a twist (since me trying to make our world more liberal in that world unlike in this world would be counter cultural just like in the 1960s it was counter cultural to fight for liberal causes). That will also happen via a Red-green-brown alliance. Once that happens and I repeat the cycle
I am also Spiritual but not religious (including being a Christian-Assemblies of God exploraseeker) and Theological
Fiscal
I am a Social Democrat (Third Way and by extension Liberal Socialist), Left Libertarian: Anarcho Individualist (Left Wing Laissez faire, Free market Anarchist-Mutualist [with Austrian economics],Agorist) Democratic (Left Rothbardian Paternalistic Conservative) Cap
I support the Labour Party UK (Blue Labour/New Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy)
Besides me supporting Labour Party UK Social Democracy, I also support Danish Social Democracy and some fringe forms of Social Democracy from the early mid 1920s through mid 1930s, especially from the mid late 1920s through the early 1930s which can be seen throughout this blog
I support Anarcho Monarchism (like Bane from Batman) and Libertarian Municipalism in specific situations. I am generally against Monarchism as a whole
I supported the Southern Tea Party years back and would do so today if they came back
I agree with a few of Barack Obama's economic recession reforms including Demand supply economics. When our economy is that like it was in the late 2000s it needs a boost from the government like that to fix it
I want to use either Democratic Socialism with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning with some form of market socialism (some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning) OR Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy to lead to us an eventual State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China)
OR
I want to use Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) ,Agorist) to lead to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society
Path to a State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China)
The Democratic Socialist transition path
The Democratic Socialist transition path to a State Socialist society would have Democratic Socialism but with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning and or with some form of market socialism, some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning
In this phase there would seriously be less government regulation of business and trade. There would be deregulation to increase economic growth and to cut back unneeded funding
In this Democratic Socialist transition phase there would be no occupational licensing for jobs like dog walkers and barbers .Spending would be cut. These things should be done in a Democratic Socialist economy with free markets and minimal regulations that we transition to as we further transition to a State Socialist government (with Supply Side reform) who will then reverse course on this by allowing the state to step in
The Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path
In this Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path, workers would have widespread self management within the framework of a Liberal Democratic market economy. They would vote to elect their managers and even directly own their workplace .
Early on, in this Liberal Democracy with Market Socialist economy, limits would be placed on the government to protect it from degenerating into an autocracy or aristocracy. Direct Democracy would be established within the workplace and within the government. The transitional government would then exist as an institution to protect the rights of the individual from predatory corporations, authoritarian leaders, and corruption. All of this would be to make the transition to a State Socialist government more smooth and natural
Corporate donations (including donations from worker-managed collectives) would be banned. There would also be limits placed on the amount of money that private individuals could contribute to their electoral candidates. Competition between self managed corporations would be encouraged in order to prevent technological stagnation.
Eventually as we transition further to a State Socialist economy, there would be use of a local government to further social and public ownership of utilities before the state steps in truly socializing the Means of Production but in a all hands on deck sort of way that ideally makes everyone at least somewhat happy (public ownership is rightfully or wrongfully seen by a significant amount of people to be inefficient or undesirable).
Thus this would lead to lead to a liberalization of a centralized State Socialist government
I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties, which I would want implemented in our future State Socialist government.
This State Socialist government that I want would use Supply side reform to forcibly extracting surplus from the working class and peasantry for the purpose of modernizing and green industrializing . Through Side Side reform and similar measures, the state acts as a public entity by re investing the accumulated capital into the society
Supply Side reform would allow the government to maintain prudent, neutral monetary policy and proactive fiscal policy. They would do this to ensure housing supply through multiple channels, including renting. This would focus on improving productive efficiency and promoting advanced industries and innovation, in the pursuit of high-quality development.
Supply Side reform would mean in depth institutional planning and long term adjustment. It would be necessary whether or not the economy is good but very necessary in a future State Socialist government. However, the supply side also has short term issues like eliminating the supply surplus.
Eliminating the supply surplus along with releasing the excessive resources that are trapped inside it will improve the efficiency of resource that are used while promoting economic growth, which is the essence of supply side structural reform. “Zombie companies” in some regions rely on subsidies from local governments, which result in the decline of the whole industry's supply capacity. In this sense, supply side reform is a long term issue. Supply side structural reform would focus on the “elimination of excess capacity”. In a broader sense, this would mean de stocking, de leveraging and cost reduction.
The capacity would not be released while the next round of growth wouldn’t occur if such measures were not taken. Eventually, the economy would escape its slow performance, abnormal state and deflation, and we would then see the results of supply side reform
The adjustment has an active meaning. When the economy is very hot, all enterprises have their orders. However, when the economy is in a downward turn, enterprises that have focused on product innovation and technologies in recent years are presented with greater advantages. Those enterprises that aren’t very professional and whom always think about speculations find themselves in the position of maybe being eliminated, merged or regrouped.
When good resources are allocated to good enterprises, direct financing will cause better benefits will be while direct will play a bigger role.
Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Agorist) path to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society
As per this, monopolies (like the patent monopoly, land monopoly etc) would need to be abolished
In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition, wealth would initially be distributed equally (freed markets naturally equalize wealth). People would be paid in proportion to how much work they do and that exploitation or usury was taking place if they weren’t working.
Employers would still be able to own companies or workplaces in several different areas as long as the employer pays their employees the full value of their labor.
In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition people would get paid in proportion to how much labor they did and that exploitation or usury would take place if they were not doing that labor
These elements below also might be part of this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) stage but if they don’t mesh with the above system, they would serve as an alternative transition method. They are based specifically on Kevin Carson-Roderick Long , and we can use the label Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) interchangeably for them , as to distinguish them from the Benjamin Tucker variety above but they basically the same thing and same methods
In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition there will be a strict application of natural rights, self-ownership, and totally unregulated radical free markets based on Austrian economics in a stateless society in order to "eat the rich"
Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition would retain the classical liberal ideas of self ownership and free markets.
Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition free markets in this transition, taken to their logical conclusions would yield anti capitalist, anti corporatist, anti hierarchical and pro-labor society . This is because in a truly laissez faire free market, the ability to extract a profit from labor and capital would be negligible.
In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition, to avoid private appropriation and accumulation and free competition causing unequal wealth distribution, the state would be stopped from transferring wealth to the wealthy (which they do by subsidizing organizational centralization in the form of transportation and communication subsidies) by focusing on organizational issues, decentralized manufacturing and the informal and household economies
Black markets and counter economics would be one of the methods used to help threaten the state authority and state capitalist class This is because Capitalism is an exploitative system based on privilege backed by the State
There would be alternate institutions built , piece by piece replacing the statist, capitalist, society. This would be a gradualist approach to dismantling and replacing the state with new forms of social organization. The culture of this society would be anti imperialist and thoroughly radically left wing on cultural issues as gender, sexuality and race-ethnicity
Somewhere in this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition stage, all 6 monopolies would need to be abolished to go along with this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition , as outlined here. These monopolies include the Agribusiness monopoly, the infrastructure monopoly, the utility monopoly, the security monopoly, regulatory protectionism, and the healthcare monopoly
Using the existing market, producer and consumer cooperatives, small enterprises, mutual aid institutions, do-it-yourself collectives, community gardens, credit unions, etc would be initiated. These wouldn’t tend to directly conflict with Capitalist institutions. The state would also be influenced through pressure groups and lobbying. The main effort would be the creation of alternate institutions. At some point these would become strong enough to challenge the state.
During this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition , the Capitalist and Statist privileges would be removed from the free markets. There would eventually be voluntary cooperation and exchange. These freed markets would have no corporations or a social hierarchy. The lower class would thus be liberated and all exploitative hierarchies would thus be abolished to create this freed market .These will thus be freed markets (eventually liberating the lower class). Basically economic nationalism with the subordination of market mechanisms to the national economy concerns
You can have free markets without Capitalism because Capitalism originally never referred to a free market but to a statist class in which capitalists controlled the state with the state intervening on their behalf
The entrepreneur would be the driver of this new freed market instead of the Capitalist and state benefited Capitalist (typically one in the same) .
These articles expands on what would happen in this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) transition to our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society
If we aren’t ready to transition to either a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society or eventual State Socialist economy like I mentioned above (and must endure a capitalistic economy) , then we must enact policies which make our current capitalistic system more left, charitable and compassionate.
For this to happen we would need to create a system within our capitalistic government with an autonomous but neither supportive of the individual or the state in principle) democratic state enactment of policies with greater state intervention when necessary which in effect create a compromise between upper and lower classes (with a balance between the two depending on what is most practical), while remaining compatible with free market capitalism.
This would mediating social class conflict and cater to the demands of work with principles such as duty, structure and organicism. Top-down policies and bottom up initiatives (i.e goal setting) implemented by democratic governments (as benevolent paternal figures) to cultivate a good life for all citizens. There would be state intervention as seen below but not really a command economy
Under this system, with moderately regulated (government intervention when necessary) and populist market capitalism it would establish cooperative economic institutions.
These cooperative economic institutions would include institutions that facilitate bargaining between government bodies (to set goals and ensure fair play and equal opportunity) and business and labour organizations such as unions, and those entities that regulate the relationships between employees and management within private firms.
The development of institutions to promote this cooperation among public and private economic entities would acknowledge the benefits of market competition, while it attempts to address the social problems of unrestrained capitalism often with government regulation of markets in the interests of both consumers and producers.
Economic security concerns of citizens under this system are addressed through redistributive/distrubitist policies. These policies would include income transfers like welfare payment programs and pensions, to support the elderly and poor’s financial needs.
Other policies involved in this system to promote economic security would be social insurance, and the fiscal financing of education and job training programs to stimulate employment . These would have more emphasized safety nets to deal with poverty
Under this system, a right to private ownership of productive property would be a central tenet, and would be recognized as a basic liberty of all citizens, as in a regular free-market capitalist economy (i.e Democratic Capitalist private property system). But it would also have elements of a Left Rothbardian private property system
This would address the social entitlement and justice concerns through the preserving like I wrote above the private property rights of citizens, allowing citizens to be free, equal, and self-governing
Then after enough time in this society we can shift toward a Pan Secessionist, Bioregional and maybe Libertarian Municipal society to finally reach our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist utopia, albeit not in the ideal way or using the ideal methods
expanded
This article reflects some of my thoughts on free markets in a static capitalistic society
I am can lukewarmly condone Lee Atwater's fiscal-welfare views but ONLY for left acceleration reasons and ONLY when his fiscal-welfare views are fused with Humanistic Capitalism/B Sanderism, Free Market Proto-CapCom and Welfare Chauvinism, otherwise I am against his fiscal-welfare views even if they lead to left acceleration
anti
I am against Socialism without adjectives (since its vanilla, and has bad connotations), Liberation Socialism , what Republicans falsely label as Socialism, and a few other forms of Socialism.
I am Anti Crony Capitalism , Anti Social Liberal Capitalism, Anti Keynesian Capitalism (except when it was used early in Barack Obama’s tenure as noted above), I am strongly non supportive of most to the vast majority of other forms of Capitalism . Capitalism is bad in part because it is so modern
Under Capitalism ESPECIALLY Neoliberalism, crony Capitalism Social Liberal Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism (except when it was used early in Barack Obama’s tenure as noted above), private property is under attack due to the homeless epidemic it creates with millions of people losing their homes through the foreclosures that it creates. Cuba doesn’t have a homelessness problem due to them having in some ways, less bad fiscal policies than the US along with their unique private property model (where they have a mirage of having no private property when they do in fact have private property but in a way that Mark Twain would accept)
I am against Neoliberalism
I am against Cultural Marxism and we need to aggressively (but peacefully) and constitently fight against Cultural Marxism everywhere it exists.
I am Anti Woke Communism and against the vast majority of Communism variants (only really being ok with spreading salvageable specific fringe Communism)
I am against Freemasonry
Socioeconomic
If I am too socialistic for you, here me out. In a truly Socialist society or Communist society, there are no need for social welfare, re-distributive taxation and regulatory measure. This is because in a Socialist society or Communist society, workers have greater control of the means of production and in the workplace, and eliminate exploitation by directing the surplus value to employees.
In a Socialist society or Communist society , free access to the means of subsistence is a requisite for liberty because it ensures that all work is voluntary and no class or individual has the power to coerce others into performing alienating work.
Socialists and Communists are also less class reduction and class essentialist than Social Democrats and Social Liberals, seeking to eliminate inequality through eliminating classes as opposed to diversifying the ‘oppressor and bourgeois’ classes. No classes, no class reduction or class essentialism
Socialists generally want to achieve greater equality in decision making and economic affairs, while granting workers greater control of the means of production and their workplace and to eliminate exploitation by directing the surplus value to employees.
While Social Democrats and Social Liberals aim to achieve greater economic stability and equality through policy measures such as taxes, subsidies, and social welfare programs, Market Socialists aim to achieve similar goals through changing patterns of enterprise ownership and management.
So if we want to get rid of the welfare state , taxes, and government regulation , we need to get rid of Capitalism. Because those things only can exist within a society with a Capitalist economy as unlike Socialism and Communism , those safety nets are needed for Capitalism.
Socialism was ruined by the USSR and similar countries, if the USSR and those Socialist countries were run like Mikhail Gorb ran the USSR with his brand of Socialism (which is closer to real Socialism) there would never have been a red scare
I support the ForcetheVote since we were in a health crisis and needed better access to healthcare. I would support Medicare for All in the future but only in a non capitalist economy (and non State Socialist economy) or in a capitalist economy if there is another health crisis
It is hard and complicated to find true healthcare solutions. We need to dig deep to examines policies and offer impactful solutions. Health is a human right, while we also need more of a nuanced and individualistic mindset that sets the US apart from Western Europe.
I am ok with the Australia inspired public option model but with a twist.
If you are one of those people (like a worker, and or young and or healthy etc) who doesn’t need expensive private insurance you can receive quality , health care (via a free trial model) using a healthcare version of the bad bank model and a semi private charity model fused with a peer to peer model, the latter has Americans helping Americans who can’t afford healthcare get healthcare via private donations from Americans to other Americans to be able to get healthcare (Americans would be incentivized to do so) but in a peer to peer way.
However, if you like your private insurance, you’re financially secure, you have specific needs that aren’t covered by the plan above, or you simply don’t trust the healthcare plan above, then you have every right to keep your private insurance.
This plan would disassociate health from employment which is good because healthcare should not be a factor in picking the right job, (my dad was forced to keep his job to get us quality healthcare and that should not be the case for workers), and incentivize regulators to negotiate transparent and affordable drug and treatment prices, prioritizing people over big Pharma.
I believe the “Medicare for All Who Want It with a twist” model reflects where Americans are and if our country does a better job delivering healthcare than the private providers deliver, we could ultimately shift to the single payer system that Donald Trump favors . I eventually want our healthcare industry to be nationalized under a future State Socialist government (like the NHS in the UK), but down the line
I tolerate Universal Basic Income ONLY if it would replace (or heavily limit) welfare and similar big gov bureaucratic programs. It also should streamline assistance to needy people without needing to check eligibility and makes it easier for unemployed people and even people on welfare to find work since having more money allows flexibility in finding the right job .But it is too generous and supported by too many people for me to officially support
In our current static capitalistic society, I support the rights of private property owners to the extent that I write below. Property rights as evidenced in this blog are important to me
Property rights are as a contingent yet very constrained social strategy, that is reflective of the importance of multiple, overlapping rationales that call for separate ownership and of natural law principles of practical reasonableness, defending robust yet non-absolute protections for these rights in a manner
These are ground in a clear statement of the natural law basis for the view that solidaristic wealth redistribution by individuals is at times morally required. However, as a response by individuals and grass roots networks to particular circumstances instead of a state driven attempt to achieve a particular distributive pattern.
We should advance detailed arguments for workplace democracy rooted in such natural law principles as subsidiarity, which we defend as morally desirable and as a probable outcome of the elimination of injustice rather than as something that is mandated by the state.
Natural law approaches to land reform and factory occupation by workers. Rejecting natural law that grounds to intellectual property protections, while building on property rights more general and developing a general natural law account of boycotts.
Rudolf Rocker echoes my views on the relation between Anarchism and Liberal Socialism : “Modern anarchism is the confluence of the two great currents which during and since the French revolution have found such characteristic expression in the intellectual life of Europe: Socialism and Liberalism. The classical liberal ideals were wrecked on the realities of capitalist economic forms. Anarchism is necessarily anti-p capitalist in that it opposes the exploitation of man by man. But anarchism also opposes the dominion of man over man. It insists that socialism will be free or it will not be at all. In its recognition of this lies the genuine and profound justification for the existence of anarchism. From this point of view, anarchism may be regarded as the libertarian wing of socialism. It is in this spirit that Daniel Guérin has approached the study of anarchism in Anarchism and other works.” This is also touched upon by Noam Chomsky here
I agree with what Vaush said here “When (Karl) Marx and following theorists wrote on capitalism they weren't writing 'capitalism and liberalism are worst things to ever happen to humanity, they are the greatest oppression of workers'. No. Marxism is supposed to be an extension of liberalism not a rejection of it, a true promotion of unity, fraternity, and freedom, and liberty, and shit. That's what Marxism and that's what leftism is about, it's about bringing the messaging of the liberal movement forward, to make it better, to make it get stronger, to make it true to its principles.”
Raising the Minimum wage would force full time workers into part time jobs and hurt their access to health care benefits. It has to be rolled out in a way to prevent this
I support the Welfare state (Nanny state) that is funded by taxes that use a taxation model based on all of my socioeconomic views in this blog combined but with regular Social Democracy given the majority of the weight (since its natural to have ‘Nannys’ help down and out people since that is what real Nannys do, just pretend that all people on Welfare are being aided by ‘Nannys’, no one bats a lash shen real Nannys aide children and teens, why should this be different?)
This should help transition us to an upgraded welfare state that is a fusion of universal welfare, Third Way SocDem workfarist policies like Working Families Tax Credit, National Childcare Strategy, National Minimum Wage, expanded America Works program (with GONGO added to America Works existing structure to make America Works be sort of pseudo Nationalized), TANF emergency funds and a more moderate to strong (i.e Nordic model type) expansion of a welfare state
Once we get more and more socialistic in our economy more and more people will be taken care of
I am against student debt forgiveness ideas. Students should work to pay off their student debts instead of relying on the government to do so. I do support the Responsible Education Assistant through Reforms Act
I don’t care for Build Back Better though I do like the name of the policy
My views on taxing the rich are based on one or more of my economic views/views on hypothetical economic systems mentioned above were
My view on Obamacare are based on one or more of my economic views/views on hypothetical economic systems mentioned above
I support the right to privacy
Society should replace social ‘fetters’ with social bonds and have labor be freely undertaken
I support greater egalitarianism in our society but in our current capitalistic society, I support actions to increase the distribution of skills, capacities and productive endowments instead of using redistribution as the means to achieve this (until we begin our transition to a State Socialist economy as mentioned above). This is the Third Way SocDem way
I support making sure social institutions are working sufficiently to the benefit all people. We should focus on the interests on the poor ,marginalized and down and out. Hence why I support my views in this blog
Banking/Government/trade
Personally in our current static capitalistic society, I support public-private partnerships along with private finance initiatives in order to raise funds and to mitigate the fears of a tax and spend policy or excessive borrowing.
Society in our socioeconomic world is governed by consistent and precise laws. No individual or religious faction or political force should interfere with those laws
I support people having off shore bank accounts
I condone autarchy of the great spaces
I am ok with maintaining Conservative spending plans for either acceleration reasons, or in areas or times when my economic policies can’t be implemented or practically implemented
I am generally against bank bailouts in most situations
More often than not, bank bailouts showed the banks rule over the government while the government rules over us. Banks used the bailouts to enrich themselves and their corrupt shareholders. The banks should be seized and turned over to worker committees and community reps that serve the public, which as mentioned above will happen under future socialistic type economies
I support the Gold Standard and I believe that the US should bring it back as a safety net
I reject more than a few to some aspects of international free trade. The benefits that intranational free trade provides, is not evident of international free trade benefits
I support raising the raising of the budget ceiling and debt limit in our current capitalistic economy
I support Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts and deregulations as President since at the time they were needed
I support FDR’s New Deal (I am on SSI for years, thanks New Deal) since it was mixed-syncretic but I really support the Fair Deal which was an upgrade over the New Deal
I support the Dodd Frank Act but I also support increased congressional scrutiny of the Federal Reserve (including auditing it) and easing of some regulatory laws on multiple small banks and loosening oversight to banks like SunTrust Banks which was enacted under the Dodd Frank Act. This would make it easier to seize and turn over the banks to worker committees and community reps that serve the public . Under the Dodd Frank act people are lulled into a false sense of security with banks, and at best the Dodd Frank Act is just a bandaid on this huge issue we have with our banking industry
I distrust large financial institutions as corrupt.
I am against the Great Reset
I am against moratorium on earmark funding
This echos my views on voluntary exchange
The government should not increase the tax of people who profit from the sale of stocks ,bonds or real estate.
I am against Joe Biden's IRS bank snooping plan and bank account plan and I want to help people circumvent it
I support and encourage people to use bonds and to save their money in savings accounts. If war bonds come back, I would also support people using war bonds. I believe people should go to tax seminars and learn how to save their money and invest
If the state is eliminated we would have true spontaneous order. I do believe we have some forms of economic spontaneous order which is evident by my fiscal views
I am anti statist
We need leaders who are rich and intelligent
I am against the federal government giving money to cities and states for Halloween events, Halloween merchandise, Valentine’s Day events and Valentine’s Day merchandise. That is evil communism and I won’t let those states and cities use that money for Halloween or Valentines Day .I won’t even allow those states and cities to get that money from the federal government for those purposes. Ronald Reagan and Freddie Hayek would fully agree with me on this
I want all money that states and cities have allocated for Halloween and Valentines Day to be reallocated to non holiday related things.
Business
I want Amazon and Big Tech to be broken up. It's time we end the monopoly that Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon etc have over the market . It sucks that I agree with AOC and Liz Warren on something
I support what I consider free trade and free enterprise (ie commerce).
We must gradually dissociate work from income due to increased buying power and allure of goods.
I am pro labor union , mostly because I champion the rights of workers and I don't want to see workers' rights trampled on by those liberal HR Departments who try to force those workers to be far left. So labor unions are a much better alternative . Plus labor unions are also anti globalist which is another huge plus.
We need more worker marches to show appreciation to our country's workers. Maybe when workers of all race-ethnicities are united in their jobs and there is no more class conflict, this can happen
However, bargained reductions of the work week and the concomitant increase of new workers to share their work is something we need to encourage along with flexible changes (sabbaticals, leaves, training etc) for all heteronomous type of job (within reason). This means less work for better work and more time for better life. Norilsk Russia has a good way of giving workers vacation comps that could be a model for us. This should be done no matter what economic system we are living in
Nearly all small businesses are NOT tax cheats and Justin Trudeau was wrong to lie and say that
I support the blue collar, rust belt , working class (even though they aren’t as diverse as I’d like them to be but I digress) and my combined fiscal views reflect that support
Values
I believe in Self Determination, self reliance and not making excuses. No one has it easy, life is hard. It's human nature that some people (of all identities) have it easier than other people (of all identities)
I am a Survivalist and I think it is a good concept to live by
I am a Pacifist
I am against inherited aristocracy
I am against people having a sense of entitlement
I support voluntary social cooperation
I support Anarcho rugged individual liberty. I am very NON supportive of most other types of Individualism
I feel that individuals are entitled to freedom
I am open to tolerating Dasein
I am not against people admiring self made rich people. I generally wouldn't do that personally, but I can understand why some people would admire them
I between tongue and cheek pity and pretty much sort of sympathize with people who champion the rich of the 19th century like the Newport class
I look at certain rare rich people today being rich like Barack Obama looked at Donald Trump https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/333358-obama-equated-trumps-success-to-the-goal-of-the-american-dream-as-law/
On domestic matters I am anti government due to 3 of my political idealogies being Anarchism: ANARCHO Libertarian (including ANARCHO Capitalist) and ANARCHO Monarchist. I am very skeptical of government management of anything. I don't believe there is good government at all and none possible
lgbtq
I generally support gay rights, but not at the expense of other peoples rights
Personally and legality wise, I conditionally support gay marriage (based on this line of thinking, as a way to eventually usher in Unorganized Marriage for both straight couples and gay couples):
Personally and Legality wise I am against gay marriages that infringe on other people’s rights
Personally and Legality wise, I support gay marriages that don’t infringe on other people’s rights
Systematically I support gay marriage being legal regardless if those gay marriages infringe on other people’s rights, but only if Civil Marriage, Religious Marriage and Common Law Marriage for straight couples and gay couples are abolished and a very specific form of privatized marriage that I write below is legalized for both straight couples and gay couples, otherwise I am the same systematically on gay marriage as I am personally and legality wise
This very specific form of conditional Privatized marriage for straight couples and gay couples would be within a structure of growing control of the marriage industry by the government through political intervention and regulation via a newly created Independent group of marriage companies board created by the government. Thus the government would have a role in regulating and controlling the marriages in the country despite them being privatized
This would also include the privatization of some public sectors of the US government that have connections (direct and indirect) of the marriage industry, by companies affiliated with NGOs or the government.
The government would give credits to private marriage companies with millions of earmarks to promote good relationships between them. The government would also make laws demanding that all marriage companies in the US join a newly created Independent group of companies or suffer penalties
Moreover, marriage companies in the US who were loyal to the government and their goals in running the privatized marriage industry the way they wanted would be rewarded with protection and more favorable, pro business laws create for said complying companies (which would increase the profits and investment for those marriage companies). However, due to the nature of this very specific form of conditional privatization, the government could manipulate this system to do what it wants despite it being privatized. So I am sort of rooting (systematically) for the type of marriage above to be replace Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage for people of all sexual orientations (straight and gay)
Even though I am fine with gay marriage being legalized in 2015, a part of me would have preferred that instead of legalizing gay marriage in the US and the west, gay couples in the US and the west who wanted legal rights and recognition for their relationships would instead be given the same rights that gay couples in the UK had in the last years before gay marriage was legalized in the UK.
I try to get politicians to abolish Civil Marriages, Common Law Marriages and Religious Marriages and then make Unorganised Marriage the only legal form of marriage for straight couples and gay couples etc (Unorganised as in Unorganised Sector in India unorganised). Which is basically more privatized than privatized. Marriage is a forced social construct anyway so less officialness of it the better off we are. The state should really stay out of the marriage business
Anti gay people should realize (in order for them to gain empathy for gays or at least to provide nuance and background) that gays and their empathetic heterosexual pro gay allies feel low or offended/triggered when they see someone not supporting gay marriage or gay rights (or being homophobic) . Gays used to feel they were the only gay people in their family, job, group or town/city etc.
In a weird way, I guess I can see gays being gay as a silver lining . I always get upset seeing people dressing the same way, acting the same way, doing the same things etc, so to see people be different sexual orientation wise (by being gay or bi sexual etc) is a nice refreshing break from that for me. It means they aren't afraid to be different and not be 'brainwashed' to be 'normal'.
Seeing gays get their equal rights and acceptance should give people like me who are different hope that maybe being different and unique will be not only accepted but maybe something that is actually commonplace in the future where people don't all dress , act etc the same and don't do the same things.
There is a decent outside chance I may soften up on the gay issue at some point in the future and I thus may become something that is between being like a Radically Centrist lean Radically Center Left version of Rudy Boesch during and after Survivor Borneo on the gay issue and me being exactly like a Rick Warren idealized version of Borat on the gay issue in thoughts, words and actions
A lesser but still a big reason I am against gay rights and gay marriages that infringe upon other peoples’ rights is because I feel that gays are being used by liberals as stepping stones to further their own selves and party. Liberals also use gays as background objects to fill their diversity quotas/fetishes or to make themselves look 'moral' which also triggers me. Unlike Liberals, I at least have respect for the Christian right since they level with them and try to in their minds help them in what they perceive to be the ‘correct’ way and treat them as humans not as background objects.
If I was born in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s, 2050s etc, and being pro gay and supporting gay rights (including gay marriage) was still a Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal thing to do, I would be pro gay and more pro gay rights (ie I would support unconditional gay marriage) for my entire life and I'd most likely be an ally of the LGBTQ+ movement in that hypothetical situation too. I'd be as pro gay my whole life in the above hypothetical situation as the majority of Americans born (and will be born) in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s, 2050s etc
I support the repeal of DADT for Libertarian reasons. The IDF and Kurds are proof gays are just as capable of fighting in the military as straights
I believe there was middle ground in the Kentucky marriage license fiasco from years back . I do not condemn Kim Davis. She did what she thought was right
Gays made gay rights a civil rights issue which helped their cause (just giving some context here)
I accept Log Cabin Republicans as Conservatives, I may not be their biggest cheerleader (to say the least) but they are part of our movement and thus I accept them. I have a Left Wing version of Don't Ask Don't Tell type of acceptance of GOProuders in our movement and I view GOProuders as Sympathetic Anti Heroes.
I support adding a Queer Theory (ideally a Radically Centrist variety) and Gay shame movement (non regressive/center left variety) sub caucus to the Congressional LGBTQ Equality Caucus so I could symbolically support that caucus
I echo this review on a book about Queer Anarchism
Discrimination of LGBGT people not only negatively effects LGBTQ but is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich
So by fighting against LGBTQ discrimination, it can help all workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of a ti LGBTQ bigotry, their attention would then shift to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people, not just LGBTQ in all aspects. So yeah, selfish motive (help LGBTQ) by doing something that appears woke (fighting against LGBTQ discrimination), might not be that bad of an idea. To do this, we need to protect LGBTQ people from and possibly kick the sh#t out of any homophobic or transphobic co workers who harass or endanger our LGBTQ co workers like how Roger Goodell use to protect his gay brother as youngster even beating up homophobes who harassed his brother. LGBTQ saviorism is fun. The equality act is too much big gov, we shouldn’t have to rely on the gov to play peacekeeper with such laws they need to focus on relevant things. We the people can do it just fine on our own
I feel in my conscious that in an ideal world, gays should have the same type of bonds and relationships with people of their own sex that David and Jonathan had with each other in the bible (and for females a female version of that) instead of being gay.
I do not support Rick Perry's anti gay early 2010s law which is too harsh and uncompassionate.
I support protecting the dignity and security of elderly LGBTQ people through Christianity to help bridge the gap for them between Earth and the afterlife, along with easier access for STD care, Mushroom semi legalization for LGBTQ elderly people and the creation and expansion of LGBTQ retirement communities (like Andrew Cuomo would want to create and expand) . I also support predistrubition for elderly LGBTQ people. Elderly LGBTQ are a unique asset to our communities
I oscillate between being far centrist on criminalizing gay acts and straight acts , me having zero tolerance for criminalizing gay acts, and me being against criminalizing gay acts so much I want to infilitrate homophobic organizations who criminalize or try to criminalize gay acts so I can destroy such homophobic organizations from within so I can make gay act criminalization a thing of the past.
I want the FMA passed but updated and changed to state:
Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of human heterosexual couples and human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes. This constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups of intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems , galaxies and universes
The first sentence would provide an official definition of legal marriage in the United States. This would be designed to restrict the right of marriage to human heterosexual couples, human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes and to deny that right to intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes.
I take a Boll Weevil Democrat stance on gays using surrogacy to adopt children.
I support a Murray Rothbard-Anarcho Capitalism form of state adoption for straight couples, gay couples and couples of all sexual orientations to replace our current system of adoption
Since I am Libertarian I am against adoption centers being forced to have anti gay adoption discrimination laws
I am against banning Gay conversion therapy for Libertarian reasons and slippery slope reasons. That is fascism. I don't know if gay conversion therapy works, I do know Spiritual/Christian (ymmv) counseling is more likely to work than gay conversion therapy (like my former church does) but the latter isn't gay conversion therapy and I don’t know if it works
I am against Lesbian Erasure. Instead of pushing them to transition or be fluid they should either be left alone or if they are already being pushed to be transgender or fluid, instead be pushed to be straight. Even if I supported gay rights, I would be against Lesbian Erasure. Lesbians and Homosexuals are equal and should be equally visible in the LGBQT+ movement
I am against Heterophobia, there is nothing wrong or oppressive about being heterosexual
I am proud to be Straight and I support Straight Pride
I tolerate Heterosexism
I don’t believe Ron Desantis should control what kids learn or don’t learn in school. He is a governor not a school board president and he should not have passed his authoritarian law.
However, even though it should have happened via school board meetings involving parents not via an authoritarian law by Ron Desantis, I am fine with the result: Florida kids in grades k-3 not being what some concerned centrist and right wingers people call ‘groomed’ and not having a sensitive topic like LGBTQ topics taught to them when they are too young and immature to grasp such a topic. Students, especially in grades k-3 should learn about the basics like the 3 Rs, history (which maybe could include brief mentions of LGBTQ), not about complex subjects like that.
I can at least try to tolerate with students in grades 4-8 in social studies and in high school in social studies and sex ed learning LGBTQ topics (in a neutral way), but anything more and or earlier is a too much. Kids should be kids, not experts on sex and gender topics. Anyone who disagrees would have to convince me whether they would have wanted to learn about LGBT Q topics in school when they were in their youth
I strongly don't believe in in grades k-10 students should be ‘taught’ courses that virtually focus on LGBTQ (like LGBTQ Studies). Let kids be kids. At minimum they should NOT be taught this type of garbage in any grade unless Billy Sunday would approve it
More than 48 percent of DC LGBTQ+ youth have seriously considered suicide over the past year and percentages across the country aren’t far off. We have to help LGBTQ not even consider suicide since Republicans wrongly take the blame for said suicides. To do this, we need to use our God given minds and hearts along with an all hands on deck approach to do so
I support Intersex rights
I cautiously support transgender marriage being legal
Every transgender person from our reality past present and future has clones of themselves in alternate realities who were born as the same biological sex and gender that those transgender people from our reality became when they became their new gender (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse)
Every transsexual person from our reality past present and future has clones of themselves in alternate realities who were born as the same biological sex that those transsexual people from our reality became when they became their new sex. (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse)
The reason why I am very weary of transgenderism is because transgender people are sadly harmed when they try to defy the patriarchy and its gender expectations and that makes me very wary of supporting transgender rights knowing transgender people could be harmed by such patriarchy. We need to destroy traditional gender roles (and gender roles themselves) and the patriarchy as noted elsewhere in this blog so men acting feminine etc is seen as normal as men acting masculine and women acting masculine etc is seen as normal as women acting feminine now and thus by extension where being transgender etc is seen as being normal as cisgender
Once we destroy the patriarchy (which I am trying to try to do), I will unwearyingly support transgender rights since I will know then that with the patriarchy destroyed, transgender people won’t be harmed anymore since we will be in a world without traditional gender roles or without any gender roles
I see transgenderism as more than a silver lining since transgenderism shakes up the whole boring sex/gender tropes by not allowing people who are born male or female to be pigeon holed into being male or female. This is good because it allows diversity to the male and female sexes where not all females are female (but are really male), and not all males are male (but really female) .
I take a Boll weevil Democrat stance on the whole pronoun issue
I support NY’s new inclusive licenses and ids
Award shows should have unisex categories and use the pre 2000s or pre 2010s award categories (retro award categories)
CHILDREN between 4 and 17 SHOULD NOT BE TRANSGENDER. IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR THEM TO BECOME TRANSGENDER because they might be victims of bullying and discrimination by their peers if they become transgender that young. This is to protect them from bullying, not to deny them their rights
I am only ok with infants and toddlers (from newborn to 3 years of age) being transgender because that would mean those babies will not be forced to change their gender in school by activist teachers and be immune to that sick grooming and because being trans from that age onward is almost like they were born as the gender they changed to as an infant/toddler, so it feels more ‘natural’ .Basically a lesser of two evils. I would never allow my niece to be transgender at any age below 17
Children networks should not be teaching kids about Draq Queens. Children should not be drag queens Shame on Nickelodeon for their indoctrination of our kids with that trash. Drag queens stereotype and objectify women and teach children to do so which makes it harder to destroy the patriarchy so we have to stop this
It is NOT transphobic for non transgender people to not want to date transgender people.
There is NOTHING wrong or transphobic about a woman saying they are proud to be a woman. I fully support Adele's 2022 Brit Awards speech. Her speech was 100 percent positive and great.
Teachers should not encourage students to be transgender. Their job is to teach not to be cheerleaders for students being transgender. I am also against Nickeledeon brainwashing our children with their transgender indoctrination. Shame on them. If that network is called filthy commies they have it coming. Nickelodeon was way more moral and better for kids in the 1970s and 1980s and even into the early 1990s than it is now.
I strongly believe transgender women should not be allowed to get cervical cancer screenings since they don't have those organs and that transgender men should be allowed to get cervical and breast cancer screenings
It should not be a crime or a cancelable offense to dead name
I believe that there is a biological difference between males and females.
There are only two genders Male and Female but if people want to believe there are a boatload of genders then so be it
Males have penises , females have breasts and vaginas. SCIENCE SAYS SO. Anyone who says otherwise is insane. Science says so
I fully support the Man or Woman segment that used to be on the Maury show and I hope he brings those segments back
God sees transgender people as the biological sex they were born as.
I am between strongly against and having zero tolerance for Polygamy, Polyamory and open marriages. I don't want anyone to engage in Polygamy, Polyamory or open marriages ever.
I want Polygamy, Polyamory and open marriages to be illegal forever. Monogamy is 100000x times better.
I am against Pedophilia being legal and I think that Pedophila is evil, wrong and extremely bad. We need to get tough love tougher with pedophiles not less tougher on them (but still realize their sin is no worse or better than any other sin and that they need Christ to break free and in a way which strongly influences them to get help and change but faslely makes them think that its their decision alone to change and get help). Mainstream techniques that currently are used to cure pedophiles should be fused with Christian Assemblies of God inspired values to be used on pedophiles (voluntarily) so they have no excuse.
I fully condemn everything in that liberal pro pedo USA Today article on pedophiles. That article is nonsense and pro pedo garbage. Pedophiles aren't born that way and based on my SBNR exploraseeking Christian Assemblies of God views, I believe that Pedophiles just thinking pedophilic things without acting on them is a sin since God says thinking of doing sinful acts is the same as doing sinful acts (we should all apply this thinking to our own lives too and not even think of doing sinful acts)
My other views on Pedophiles matches the current Paleoconservative views on them but with a smidge of intutiveness and common sense pity added to said views)
In a more ideal world (ymmv), we'd teleport a lot to most pedophiles from the US who are currently in prison or on parole (or who are close to being put back in prison) to Emerald City in the Oswald State Correctional Facility in the late 1990s/early 2000s in an alternate reality where the HBO tv show Oz is real.
This way those pedos can be dealt with by the anti pedo Oz inmates (in that reality and time period) the same way that that pedo inmate was dealt with by those same anti pedo inmates on Oz (though we'd give those pedos we were tranferring to the late 1990s/early 2000s Oswald State Correctional Facility's Emerald City in that fictional reality a fighting chance by trying to give them advice and training before we teleport them so they have as much of a chance to survive and at times thrive in that prison like how Beecher survived and thrived on Oz during the show's run). Moreover those pedos would have Sister Pete and Father Makula to give them counciling to further help them break free.
They'd only be in that place for a year or possibly more (keep in mind inmates in Oz's Emerald city have a lot more freedom than normal inmates here do). If they survive that, they will be released and can live anywhere they want in that alternate reality version of the US that the HBO tv show Oz takes place in, assuming they find a job, get a place to live etc like other people do in that alternate reality version of the US in that time period.
Then those pedophiles can continue to fight for their so called 'rights' but in that alternate reality version of the US that the HBO tv show Oz takes place in and they'll always be 20 something years behind us in our reality since besides teleporting them to that fictional alternate reality where the HBO tv show Oz is real, we also sent them back in time (to the late 1990s/early 2000s). If they get their rights in that alternate reality version of the US that they demand here, better there than here. Out of sight (or out of reality and time period) out of mind.
Some conservatives who aren't pedophiles get falsely smeared as being pedophiles or Conservatives as a whole are falsely stereotyped as pedophiles and those stereotypings need to end since those are blatant lies and extreme defamation. I would never do that to Liberals or Liberalism as a whole so they shouldn't do that to Conservatives.
I am very much against Pornography and I want Pornography to be illegal . Pornography cheapens love,is disgusting, immoral, exploitative and is wrong. We should spread the Feminists anti pornography views. They rightfully recognize the horrors of how pornography is harmful to women and leads to increased violence against women. Feminists knows the appalling tendency of pornography to use coercion on women (physical, psychological, economical etc) to do Pornography, even if women are seen to be having a good time (which they aren’t because pornography objectifies women). Feminists know women aren’t there by choice, that ‘happiness’ is not natural but coerced and artificial and like feminists, that bothers me.
We need to get the word out that Pornography is wrong and must be abolished because it is patriarchal propaganda.
I am fine with BDSM
I am against fetishography and I want it to be illegal forever
I am against legalizing public sex. People should never be allowed to have sex in public ever.
Womens reproduction issues
I am as pro life as I am mostly because of the liberal like SJW tactics the pro lifers used to covert people to be pro life converted me to be ‘pro life’ (from a liberal like SJW perspective). I see the unborn baby’s rights like modern pro choice liberal SJW activists see the pregnant mother’s rights. I feel unborn babies rights are even more important than the rights of adults since unborn babies are most vulnerable (I am a Youth rights activist and ally of Disability rights).
If biological men could have babies I would be more pro life toward men than I am toward women (because I trust women more to make decisions with their bodies than men).
Even though I am as pro life as I am, I seriously downplay the the abortion issue. We need to put divisive issues like abortion aside and focus on moving ahead together. We need to drop the whole left right chasm or pro life pro choice divide and be pro forward
I support increased but indirect government funding for family planning
Personally, I am Pro Life for all 3 trimesters
Legality wise, I am “pro choice” as well as “anti abortion” for first trimester abortions. I respect the privacy of the mothers to make the decision that is best for them. I want the government to reduce the number of abortions by increasing availability of other options instead of establishing regulations on abortion.
Deep down inside legality wise I am pragmatically and conditionally pro life for early term abortion
Legality wise, I am pro life for second trimester abortions except for rape, incest, to save the life of the mother and extremely rare and very severe medical cases
Legality wise I am pro lie for third trimester abortions
Based on my SBNR exploraseeking Christian Assemblies of God views, God wants us to protect the most vulnerable of lives (unborn babies) and he will not tolerate us not doing so. So accordingly, abortion is against God.
I am against partial birth abortion and live birth abortion even if the baby is conceived via rape or incest. I want all babies who survive abortions to get help even if they are conceived via rape or incest
I believe while abortion should be illegal, there should be abortion sanctuaries throughout the US for women who still want abortions so they don't do them illegally as a way to give them options and not feel they are forced to go through with the abortions
Women who still want abortions also should in every circumstance (early term and mid term only) be given money from Social Enterprise-NGO coalitions for flights and hotels to seek an abortion in another country which has better abortion clinics than the US has, as a way to still give them options so they do not feel they are forced to go through with the abortions instead of going to abortion sanctuary states for an abortion. The abortion tourism would help make up for them aborting their babies
If I was in a world where unborn babies don't have a conscious or awareness until the third trimester (and are basically pieces of flesh until the third trimester).
In that hypothetical world, I'd personally and legality wise be Pro Choice (ie support the woman’s right to choose) for the first two trimesters (in every possible circumstance) and Pro life for the third trimester (alt apolitical on abortions in that hypothetical world for babies who are conceived via rape or incest).
In all 3 trimesters I still would support the Hyde Amendment , I still would want more adoption centers opened nationwide, I would still be against partial birth abortion and live birth abortion (even if the mother was pregnant via rape or incest) and would want the babies who survive abortions to be saved even if they were conceived via rape or incest
Personally I am fifth political position to apolitical lean pro life on abortion for rape, incest and personally picky conditionally lean pro choice to save the life of the mother. Legality wise I am between pro choice and empatheticly pro life and conditionally lean pro choice on abortion for rape, incest and to save the life of the mother
I want women who want an abortion to instead have their unborn fetus transfered to an artificial womb when that becomes viable in the future. That way, the unborn baby can still be born, but from a different (artificial) womb. This way the woman who doesn't want her child can transfer that unborn fetus to an artificial womb so the child still gets to be born (even if the child was conceived via rape or incest) If that happened, I would be personally and legality wise pro life for all 3 trimesters
I believe something like sex
I support more resources going into contraceptives to help prevent women needing to get an abortion.
I am against Justin Trudeau going after pro life charities and pro life groups. Trudeau is a hypocritical fascist dictator for doing that and proves he is a hypocrite on abortion since he doesn't trust women to make their own decision
I believe that only doctors should perform abortions, and that all abortion clinics should be regulated abortion clinics in order to keep patients safe
It should be illegal for employers to require their workers to be pro choice
I support parental consent laws but in a compassionate sort of way that isn't too rigid
I support parental notification for a minor getting an abortion
I support the Hyde Amendment
I accept Texas's new abortion laws and I am refreshed that they are doing that. But I do pity to empathize with people who are against that law and I would be ok with them constructively finding common ground on it (that is still pro life). People who shame Texas for that law need to watch the film Unplanned.
I believe it should be illegal for pregnant women who are pregnant with a baby who has down syndrome to abort their babies because those babies have Down Syndrome. But I do acknowledge the seemingly valid counter arguements for this and I note it is a terrible situation for both sides and everyone involved
Ronald Reagan once said "the only people who are pro choice are people who are alive"
I never donate to any pro choice company and I never have and I never will encourage women to have abortions, if they ask me if they should keep the baby I always tell them to keep the baby.
Everyone should aggressively hope and pray for women to keep their children, even if they conceived that child through rape or incest (if that is best for the women and child though i digress).
Health care providers should not be required to offer free birth control.
I prefer birth control to abortion as a lesser of two evils and as long as abortion is legal, I have no choice but to support birth control as an alternative to abortion (for those reasons) but if abortion was illegal, I'd be solidly against birth control too (or at the very least against birth control being done after a certain period after the conception of the child)
I am indifferent to stem cell research
I am against population control. Population Control is an assault on reproductive rights and its a human rights violation (right to procreate, right to life) . Human life is sacred. Overpopulation (the other excuse for it) is a myth. Climate change is real but population control doesn't stop it and is extremely counterproductive. If population control being legalized here is ever a threat and I have proof that extremely liberal pro choice laws being legalized will prevent population control from being legalized in the US, in that hypothetical situation, I would with a heavy heart push for Canadian like pro choice laws (albeit only temporary ones) to be federally implemented in all 50 states to counter population control (since abortion is the lesser of 2 evils)
femdom
I support Men’s Liberation and I am generally a Feminist ally (especially in combating Toxic Masculinity). I am Anti Sexist
I generally believe that Male Patriarchy/Patriarchy is at least somewhat culturally pervasive and it has a negative effect on everyone, and negatively effects women more than men. Gender stereotypes harm BOTH men and women.We need more civil liberties and gender equality. The patriarchy is still unfortunately a factor and has claimed many victims (mostly women). Gender roles suck
The patriarchy might (big might) be enforced by women too (at least slightly see below) so the concept of a male patriarchy/patriarchy is not as simple as a oppressor-oppressed dynamic.
Patriarchy misses the point that there is equal vulnerability of average men and that our Patriarchal system excludes men who don’t conform to traditional gender roles.
As much as I loathe intersectionality, it has its uses in this area. Complicating the patriarchy idea is that Transgender men and gay men are more likely to defy the gendered patriarchal expectations which sadly harm them for daring to be different in this boring vanilla world, which gives them unique outlooks on this.
Anyway, ‘manliness’ shouldn’t be defined by the traditional archaic perceptions of that term . Men should be able to act how they want whether traditionally masculine or other ways that aren’t traditionally masculine (like femboys) That does not mean men can’t still be proud of their masculinity despite defying gender role norms . I hate society telling people how they are supposed to act, whether its gender roles, what type of clothes to wear (why can’t I wear unmatching clothes or white after Labor Day?), and similar things. Men can also lift to better themselves instead of for the sexist degrading reason of impressing women (which is so archaic)
Patriarchy/Male Patriarchy is sadly a real and infests our culture and institutions. We have to stop women from being oppressed. we must counter and defeat sexism. Men also have issues because of this evil patriarchal system and intersectionality along with other feminist concepts are needed to combat this
Feminism should be inclusive to everyone like body positive, body negative feminist movements are like so
I disagree with feminism on dating and relationship struggles. Contrary to what feminists claim, those issues are not due to not respecting boundaries or lack of self confidence. Those issues are because dating involves a lot of work for men including men having to make guesses on when to make their move. This can be tiring and not really fair to men. Also feminists don’t realize that men are offended and hurt by the fact that many women are shallow when choosing a man, using arbitrary and shallow things like fashion, career status, social status, body fitness, wealth. Moreover feminists don’t realize how sad and archaic it is for some women to choose traditionally masculine men.
Women are unfortunately not willing to let men have their emotional guard down and feminists insensitively claim men should stay away from such women while also countering this view by men in addition to saying no one is ‘entitled’ to a relationship. It is true that men can’t/SHOULD NOT force someone to love another person, but the feminists mentioned above are not helpful in this at all, and they underscore how it is perfectly normal to want a relationship over involuntary relationship loneliness which our society should try to prevent. They are however correct that forcing someone into a relationship is wrong
We need to expose the patriarchal injustices in society and fix them . Both men and women should be free
But there are a lot of feminist things (basically things from feminist movements that were hijacked by Woke Communists) that I am against (like that Lego complaint years ago by feminists, or the prominence of male rapists since I believe feminists talking about that as a woman’s issue and saying rape is mostly done by men seriously downplays or even negates male sexual assault victims or feminists saying that that video game designer from Puerto Rico was misogynist or should be fired for his gamer gate comments, or feminist complaints that Jurassic World was a sexist movie, or downplaying Valerie Solanas's extremism, or complaints about how women are portrayed in most video games, or feminist complaints about urinals, those type of feminist views like that and some other views I loathe and strongly disagree with).
I support Woman's Power, including some aspects of Radical Feminism/Radical Lesbian Feminism
Women should always get paid equally to men.
I am against Transgenderism erasing women/females. Cisgender Women/females should always be called women/females and categorized as women/females and NOT be called or categorized as birthers.
I support woman's suffrage
I celebrate the choice of and have great respect for women who choose to be housewives and mothers. Some women in my immediate family chose to be housewives and mothers and I celebrate the choice for and have great respect for that choice they made.
I do not claim that is the only valid choice for women; many women in my family or who I have great respect for were/are greatly successful career women and I also celebrate that choice for them too.
I am against women doing Prostitution , for Radical Feminist/Radical Lesbian Feminist reasons and because Prostitution is against the teachings Christ, it cheapens romance and is lust (one of the 7 deadly sins), but sex workers need to be treated like Christ treated the prostitute in the bible (and the ways above).
Prostitution should not be legalized ever
The pimp should go to prison for it , while the buyer should not go to prison for it (sort of decriminalized) but instead go to a combination of technological incarceration and a sex version of a halfway house for light prostitution offenses but prison for non light prostitution offenses and (because I am a Libertarian) the sex worker (decriminalized) should only have to pay a fine or community service along with vocation training/counseling for any type of prostitution offenses. I would give people A LOT of power to file civil lawsuits against sex workers for doing prostitution. Moreover, if the sex worker sets up a paid sex act as a pimp or a middle woman between the pimp and sex worker/client she should go to prison
I will say that when Nevada legalized Prostitution, all states should have followed suit at the same time, but that ship has long sailed for me. Sex workers should move to Nevada or Amsterdam if they want to legally do Prostitution and if private charities/NGOs want to pool money together to set up moving funds for women to move to places where Prostitution is legal to do sex work, so be it, I won’t complain about that at all, since I have bigger issues to deal with than being upset over women moving to places where Prostitution is legal to do sex work .
We must protect all sex workers, including unique ones like Transgender sex workers from exploitative and high risk situations by putting economic and health resources into their hands so they don’t need to do such work but are protected if they continue to do so due clear up that nuclear mess. We need to share Christ with them ,telling them to sin no more and do no more sex work. To find them find non sex work jobs (normal jobs) to help them grow as a person
I do not agree with things in the Wikipedia article about Gender Bias on Wikipedia. There is no one stopping women from becoming Wikipedia editors and writing articles about women or other subjects. It is just as easy for women to jump in and become regular Wikipedia editors as it is for men to do so. If any editor editor, male or female can't do that, it means they shouldn't edit Wikipedia, not because of their gender but because they are too weak.
If women can't pass the military training tests to be on the front lines they shouldn't be on the front lines, regardless of woke laws. Lowering the standards for our military for women soliders is wrong and hampers our military. Our military should emulate Russia's military and not be woke (but this is not an endorsement of Russia's military)
That Slate reporter years ago was correct to share tips about Wikipedia controversies with another reporter and by mentioning the relationship status of that video game designer.
MeToo should adopt the innocent til proven guilty guideline along with forgiving sexual abusers. MeToo also is filled with hypocricy which makes it hard not to see it as a partisan hack job
Mens issues
I have no issues with Josh Hawley's Men and the Future of America Speech. If people don't like it they shouldn't read/hear it
Chris Pratt's Instagram post is NOT sexist in any way shape or form. People who find it sexist are evil and derganged
There is nothing wrong with men showing chivalry to women and I know that chivalry is not sexist. Chivalry is a good thing and men should show chivalry to women
There is nothing wrong with Masculinity per say (as long as its not sexist or near sexist).
Toxic masculine men are misguided. They need to drop their toxic masculinity and similar bigoted views and they need to respect feminism as a positive movement because feminists want to fight for a more positive future for everyone
I obviously don't support Male Chauvinism and I more than infinity take issue with it Male Chavunists need to get into a relationship with hot chicks to cure them of their Male Chauvinism.
I am a fan of NO MA'AM from Married with Children because they are so bad ‘they’re good’ and because I sort of pity them for being slaves to masculinity and manliness . The NO MA’AMers need to be liberated from their slavery to the oppressive traditional male gender role so they can be free to embrace non traditional gender roles so they can truly be happy and pro woman
Mens/womens relational issues
Any American or Canadian in the US or Canada who couldn’t visit a family member within the US or Canada directly or indirectly because of the Russia-Ukraine conflict (meaning if that Russia-Ukraine conflict conflict never happened they would have visited said family members) are anti family COMMIE DEMONS who should be confronted for not visiting their family members in the US or Canada directly or indirectly due to that conflict. They don’t deserve to have a family. I hope the families of those anti family COMMIE DEMONS becomes abolished and they never see their family members ever again
We need to open more adoption centers to give pregnant women more options than just abortion or caring for the child in addition to making it easier for people to adopt children
I believe we should heavily encourage and maybe even give lucrative incentives to more Christians to adopt children
I believe that adopting children should be easier for people
There is nothing wrong with Sandy from Grease changing herself into a biker chic to please Danny and I think it is a good thing she did that. There is nothing wrong with girls changing something about themselves in order to please a guy just like there is nothing wrong with guys changing something about themselves to please a girl.
I support the Promise Keepers. Some of my friends from old church were members of Promise Keepers.
I believe that a husband has a responsibility to lead his household in a loving and gentle way, giving his life to his wife (like how Christ gave his life to the Church by dying) so she (the wife) can willingly submit to her husband's leadership.
I am fine with marriage counseling classes for married couples that are similar to the ones that Will and his fiancé went to with the Jeffersons on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air. I also am passive to open hearted to married couples MMA training together or doing boxing classes together as a way of relieving stress of marriage
Similar to the Apostle Paul, I believe that for singles it is good for them to remain single unless they cannot self control in which case they should get into a romantic relationship (its better to get into a romantic relationship than to burn with lust) I believe this because single people have more time and freedom to help make our world more progressive, and due to me believing that romantic relationships are more a forced social construct, even more so than marriages and I hate forced social constructs.
In light of that, I would strongly empathize with the idea of the government creating a romantic relationship tax which somewhat taxes Americans (of all sexual orientations) who are in a romantic relationship. However, once they get married or they became single again, that tax would be eliminated unless they get into another romantic relationship again. Unlike Paul, I believe that marriages give people a lot more freedom today to make the world a better place than it was during Paul's time, almost as much freedom as singles in Paul's day had for themselves. If this tax had the negative side effect of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births.
Immigration/illegals/refugees
I support skilled immigration.
I am against mass illegal immigration and literal open borders policies .
Illegal immigrants broke a law when they illegally moved into the US and letting a mass influx of them off the hook for it sends a message that its ok to break the law. Despite this, I have some differing views on this below.
If I sound too harsh on migration and mass illegal migration, its only because since I am generally against Capitalism (ESPECIALLY Neoliberalism, Social Liberal Capitalism, crony Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism), I realize that mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration is beneficial to the capitalist class and thus that makes mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration a net negative in my eyes. Because migration happens within a capitalist country like the US, migration is sadly a modern day version of bondage (like in the Old South)
Back then, there was colonialist exploitation happening within a capitalist country via bondage due to similar conditions to today. Today via mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration, migrants and illegals sadly end up working below minimum wage or barely minimum wage in a subsistence type existence (like fuel construction work of migrants in the US for example) within a capitalist country not too much better or different than the type of dehumanizing capitalist worker exploitation that slaves were put through in the Old South.
When we defeat Capitalism and usher in a more socialistic country that meshes with my economic views, I will become more pro migrant and even pro mass illegal migration (ie I will then become as progressive on migration and illegal migration as a Rage Against the Machine idealized Paul Ryan would be on migration and illegal migration)
All illegal migrants in the US who are eligible should be put in a program in this Forward Party system below:
A system with a new tier or holocracy of longterm permanent residency that would allow immigrants who are in the US illegally to legally attain citizenship in 18 years. If they register for the new tier or holocracy , illegal immigrants who have lived illegally in the country for a substantial amount of time would be able to work and live in US, while they wait to become citizens, as long as they pay taxes and don’t receive any felony convictions.
If deportation of illegal immigrants was either was like when a nice crossing guard escorted a child home rather than how it is now and where most deported illegals moved back to the US legally after being deported OR where illegal immigrants could be population-aly resettled to their previous country by the US in a way that complies with this UN exception for population resettlement, I would be ok with those deportations/population resettlements
This is how I would Fix migration until we move beyond Capitalism:
I would have the US set up a system of temporary citizen exchanges (trading Americans for citizens in other countries). Maybe millions of such temporary exchanges a year between the US (with preferences for temporary exchanges between the US and Mexico and Central American countries).
If the temporary migrants in the US assimilate or are bicultural, are not convicted of crimes, terrorism or treason, don’t create chain migration, are ideally patriotic , show minimal knowledge of US history, government and the English language, have a steady job, are in college or the military, they can become permanent citizens of the US if they pay a one time exchange to permanent citizen tax and renounce their citizenship of their previous country to make their permanent residency official
Lindsey Graham is a bourgeois oppressor for these treasonous anti American remarks and I couldn’t disagree with him more. America does NOT belong to the world. Graham is a corrupt globalist who uses illegal immigrants as bond workers to his crony corporatist companies he illegally gets money from to further his corrupt career via pork barreling and earmarks
If open borders people or essential open borders people think the US is a ‘racist’ country, why do they want BIPOC migrants to live in such a ‘racist’ country such as the US? Wouldn’t it be better to protect these mass BIPOC migrants from such ‘racism’ by not having such mass migration and especially illegal migration?
I am not against migration, but if we ever get to a point where either there are too many migrants moving into the US a year (where even BOTH Charlie Crist and David Cameron would call for temporarily closing the border and restricting migration), AND OR there are tens of millions moving in the US a year (or something like that amount) at that point I would be lenient to looking the other way (but still not supporting) at temporarily closing the border and restricting migration
Everything has a limit, including migration. The US has Self Determination and freedom of association. They have a right not to let in people if migration ever literally gets out of hand as I write below
I am non hostile to Joe Biden invoking 42 during the pandemic
The US must work in Central America to address the root causes of migration from Central America, We also must work with Mexico to make sure that it takes its own border security seriously. Moreover, working with our neighbors to improve border security across the region is an imporant component of any policy to promote reducing illegal immigration to the US. A safe and secure region will lead to a safer, more secure United States.
I also believe that the US also must engage with countries like Mexico and in Central America to address the causes that cause them to migrate to the US illegally (ie to stop illegals from coming leaving their previous countries in the first place)
I would want more funding for the US ports of entry, fixing tech on our borders and updating our eco and environmental protections in areas like the Rio Grande.
The rest of my migration views mesh with Anarcho Capitalist-Libertarian ideology
I am solidly against what Republicans falsely call Joe Biden flying in illegal aliens into our country.
Illegal immigrants and refugees in the US don't commit more or less crimes/violent crimes than legal US citizens (though it's not a stretch to say they might commit more specific types of crimes than legal US citizens)
Churches should not snitch on illegals from their churches (see David stealing thing from the bible for why)
Migrants to the US should be required to learn English
Ronald Reagan said it best when he said you can move to Japan but not become Japanese, you can move to France but not become a Frenchman/Frenchwoman but you can move to America and become an American. Optimism is better than Determism. I believe the US is a melting pot
Illegal immigrants shouldn't have more rights than legal citizens to say the least
I am against illegal immigrants getting free health care
I am against xenophobia as history has shown Xenophobia is an artificial, bourgeois and modern construct
I am against NAFTA
I support a hard Brexit
I am a Eurosceptic
Ethnicity/race
I support the right of self determination for these groups of the US: blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics-Latinos, Hawaiians, Asians, Arabs and Pacific Islanders
While I morally (moral as in moral victory) support Affirmative Action, I want color blind hiring and gender blind hiring to replace Quota hiring such as Affirmative Action at some point in the next few decades.
I feel Affirmative Action and quotas may negatively effect BIPOC+ confidence and motivation by making it seem that they aren't good enough to get those jobs without Affirmative Action or quotas. There are no safeguards for Affirmative Action and quotas for some of the BIPOC+ who get fired or quit do to being underqualified for their jobs.
This article generally reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity. Some of my other views on race-ethnicity match the views of BGJ’s views on race-ethnicity
I echo what Judge John Roberts said on this: "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race" I also echo this
I am against Asian students being discriminated against in admissions by colleges such as Yale. Colleges should stop discriminating against Asian students. I support Donald Trump's lawsuit against Yale.
Equality is much better than Equity
I am virtually Anti Woke and I am ecspecially against the most extreme wokeness (like Wikipedia's wokeness).
Wokeness, especially the most extreme ie Wikipedia type of wokeness is divisive, irrational and off compass. It is cringe and extremely far from ideal on so many levels and it backfires each time.
My views on wokeness match Bari Weiss, Bill Maher, Joe Rogan, James Carville, The Conservative Party and a socially Paternalistic Conservative version of Tucker Carlson's (i.e much less harsh version of Tucker) views on wokeness
I have NEVER and I will NEVER apologize for being white.
There is nothing wrong with being any race or ethnicity in our universe. It is all-right to be any race or ethnicity in our universe
I am naturally against anti white hate speech and anti white jokes. I want racial and ethnic harmony and anti white behavior is not racial and ethnic harmony
I am fine with us whites prioritizing blacks over our own race (as long as its in a non woke way). When we get rid of classes, hierarchies , we won’t need to prioritize anymore . Not left not right but forward
Every race-ethnicity, nation, people, and human on Earth are equal to each other and have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to live wherever they want. Every life has value, and all people have equal value.
I fully agree with what the person who sent the letter in this article wrote: https://medium.com/@soumynona_/anonymous-letter-from-uc-berkeley-professor-in-response-to-black-lives-matter-protests-24a66a6f1ca7
I am against liberals being racist against Black conservatives like Winsome Sears, Candace Owens, Kaitlyn Bennett's friend Natalie, Tim Scott, Black Trump supporters
I am not an antiracist, I am a non racist. Racism is contrary to my values. It is believed that racism is a liberal Eurocentric and imperialist ideology. Naturally racism is wrong and evil
I am anti racial guilt
This article gives good insight to just how prejudice and appalling the modern Democrat party is for BIPOC+
I do not support BLM, (which means to them I am against BLM due to their whole ‘with us or against us’ schtick even though I am not against them).
My main reason for not supporting BLM is because BLM shouldn’t need to rely on whites like me to give them legitimacy by supporting them since BLM needing whites to support them is white saviorism and white ethnocentrism and BLM is against white saviorism and white ethnocentrism
All Lives Matter Equally. I support the rights of BLM to protest, and I condemn any violence or calls for violence against BLM by anyone. I very much prefer Louis Farrakhan’s non bigoted views and Frederick Douglas’s views on race ethnicity to BLM’s views on race ethnicity
BLM has controversies and isn’t perfect (call me Captain Obvious)
The people who are oppressed and targeted need a voice. I am fine with blacks fighting for black liberation (that’s their thing). I am against Larry Hogan using the National Guard on BIPOC+ protestors in Baltimore years ago. I was between radically centrist and intuitively pretty pitiful of the 'we the people' message from those those protests and those BLM Baltimore protestors themselves
I am glad that BLM riots/zealously (ymmv) protests against the 'police state' and against Neoliberalism because I also am against the police state and Neoliberalism (i.e crony Capitalism) and also because of left accelarionism. (as in leading to a socialist communal ,classless, heiarchyless , egalitarian society for people of all races and ethnicities)
So to see BLM protesting against the police state and Neoliberalism is a good thing in my eyes.
I feel about the fringe of the fringe (not the whole fringe) of BLM the same way that David Clarke feels about BLM as a whole
I am glad that the PSL used the deaths of minorities to further their agenda which is really about abolishing Capitalism and our hierarchal society (which are good goals). At least the PSL isn’t woke
Most of the BLM 'protests' (ie riots) in 2020 were absolutely non peaceful using my criteria and the rest of their 'protests' (ie riots) were counterproductive lean provocative to blurring the line of pushing it but at least they aren't afraid to try to force change unlike scared Conservative protestors who hide behind their keyboards.
The Neoliberal corporatist MSM and their ilk smears the Freedom convoy protestors and went too far with the Jan 6 protestors so I will do the same here.
I am against anti BLM people trying to suppress them , using violence against them or calling for violence against them. BLM have a right to 'protest' (ie riot, loot, pillage etc) and suppressing their 'protesting' or attacking them, no matter how violent , wrong and sad their 'protesting' is , is almost as bad as some of their 'protests' in the first place.
At least BLM aren't afraid to try to force change via destroying statues, rioting, galvinizing online, being elected as politicians (to force change from within).
Moreover, its more direct for BLM to scare our country into giving into them through force such as destroying statues, rioting, destroying stores, holding companies hostage than for our country to be goaded into giving in to them via Social Justice Keyboard Warrior and cancel culture methods so that is another reason I can live with their protests.
I am glad BIPOC+ force the US to give them their rights through protests, being elected to office, using Black Twitter to apply pressure, forcing themselves to integrate (as they've done in part due to gentrification), creating militant groups (ie Black Panthers etc) and similar methods.
I feel more positively about BIPOC+ doing than them relying on White Saviorism of white SJW or white politicians who 'evolve' on the issue and come to their rescue (which some of them claim is an insult to BIPOC as it stigmatizes BIPOC+ and wrongly makes it look like they can't get those rights themselves, see Elizabeth Warren’s comment on Democrats doing just that around election time each election cycle).
BIPOC+ should not be discouraged from being the change they seek and I am glad that all the rights they have gotten were through them forcing themselves to get their rights. That is how it should be. I support black self reliance (like Frederick Douglass did)
I won’t be upset one bit if the CRT is not taught in schools (the most natural fit for the CRT is in colleges, black history classes in k-12 schools, lawyer colleges, and in debate classes in k-12 schools) and I strongly empathize with people for wanting to stop it from being taught in schools . I would never allow my niece to be taught the CRT
However, keep in mind by trying to censor the CRT it might cause people who wouldn't normally read it to want to read it (people love reading things that are censored). So that is something to strongly keep in mind.
Parents who don't want the CRT to be taught in schools should try to get elected to school boards around the US to prevent the CRT from being taught in schools.
I believe the CRT is hardcore, divisive, illogical and or inaccurate, agenda driven and thus not ideal.
However i think its cool how such an controversial work can evade censorship calls in this SJW era so I guess that is a major silver lining
I echo the views of Bill Maher and Ben Shapiro on the CRT that Van Jones would condone or agree with as they put it more eloquently than I can
Learning about ourselves through reflection and retrospection should be done individually not as a whole (and on things that have nothing to do with race , racism or our country's history) .
It is rational and natural thing to do for people to do as they older to reflect on their lives. The CRT warps natural things like reflection and retrospection done for non woke and non political reasons into being a woke thing and done for woke reasons and that is wrong
White people who are racist need to be privately confronted for their bigotry and if they don't change, they should be banished or isolated forcing them to not be racist and change (sorry I don't make those rules, nature makes them and nature does not tolerate racism).
One creative idea to make those white racists become non racist against BIPOC+ would be to reprogram white racists to become woke and to embrace the CRT. This way those white racists can shift their hate target from BIPOC+ to whites or white racists (or at least shift their target from BIPOC+ to woke antiracist liberal WHITES) and employ left wing, CRT anti white 'racism' (ie "BIPOC are equal to Whites but BIPOC+ are more equal than Whites", "whitey is bad whitey is bad") and antiracist tactics toward acceptable target (white racists, maybe whites) while holding on to their other views.
Parents who 'harass', argue or go after teachers at school board meetings are NOT domestic terrorists or terrorists they are patriots
I am against the 1619 Project being taught in schools. Many mainstream historians have criticized the 1619 Project . The 1619 Project is a fib created by the NYT who should stick to their day jobs (reporting the news).
Let's hope that the 1619 is banned from schools unless it make serious changes. Make sure everyone knows what a psuedo history and divisive thing it is to force it to be more accurate and less divisive or to not be taught in schools. My grandparents generation are no fans of Hannah Nikole Jones
I am passively indifferent strongly lean condone/symbolically accepting of the CRT inspired policies like the ones implemented at Williams College, the VA, Mary Lin etc
I see a major silver lining in those CRT inspired school/housing policies like the ones implemented at Williams College the VA etc.
Those CRT inspired school/housing policies at places like Williams College , the VA etc might win swing voters to our coalition’s political factions since those policies are controversial
The real reason for those CRT school/housing policies is to help BIPOC connect with each other more and to build solidarity through these policies which will help give them a stronger and more effective voice to push for change and for similar legit reasons idpol activists have for these policies. They are not ‘anti white’ despite what Right Wingers claim but they are controversial
Those policies really do help marginalized BIPOC so they are needed and positive
I am ok with a CRT inspired black 'antiracist' council being created to fight 'racism'. I feel if blacks want our country to have woke laws, then they should make that change from within (instead of through overkill SJWism, cancel culture, counter productive boycotts, etc).
So doing those things from within through the CRT inspired black antiracist council (as opposed through being elected to the house where they are targets for lobbying and woke NGOs) would be the least offensive way for them to do that. It would be less offensive to me for them to make our country more woke through the antiracist council than through SJWism, cancel culture, boycotts etc, ie lesser of two evils)
I support Standarized Testing in schools and the SAT
I am against Equitable Math being taught in schools. Math is not racist, there is nothing racist about Math or the way that is taught. Equitable Math is race norming disguised as being something innovative. I hope Equitable Math gets banned in schools in the future.
I support Advance Math being taught in schools from pre school to 12th grade. I also support advanced students being skipped ahead a grade.
Students should not be required to take ethnic studies classes in high school. It's their RIGHT to not take that course and the government really has NO RIGHT to require students to take such courses in the first place. Ethnic studies courses should ideally only be taught in colleges (and ideally maybe vocational schools too)
Oral Roberts should not be penalized in any way shape or form for the views of their founder. Anyone who says otherwise is trolling
This site is a great start for whether blacks should receive repatriations. I am open hearted lean more than tolerant of having the government give blacks repartitions if the concerns in the link I provided were made assuming they use Dark Mutualism to do so
I have a some combination of anti hero/anti villain/just for shock value admiration for Assata Shakur (or at least the 1970s version of her)
Maybe this is because I feel BIPOC+ will at some point within the next few centuries or so outnumber whites in our country and because whites are being marginalized.
But I feel with blacks and whites switching places, blacks in the majority and power would give resentful whites a taste of what it could have been like if they whites were in that similar position like we are now but in a world where hostility against the majority race in power and wokeness didn't exist .
Since in our world, if blacks and whites switched places, blacks would never have the issues as the majority in power that whites think they have as the majority in power, since blacks would never allow hostility from WIPOC+ against them to be normalized or mainstreamed as alleged hostility against whites from BIPOC+ is currently , in their eyes normalized and mainstreamed.
Blacks also would not allow a overkill/offensive wokeness or even wokeness as a whole for whites to be normalized as wokeness for blacks is currently normalized, regardless of whether wokeness is positive or negative.
Moreover, those far right whites would finally have a race in the majority and power (blacks) who isn't seen by some as to be ‘negatively’ effected by Affirmative Action ‘quotas’ (I support Affirmative Action)
I would never try to stop the switch between whites and blacks from happening,
I would try to avoid being near any racial unrest , but there is a chance (since I am relatively easy prey) that I might be forced via brainwashing by racial justice activists to help blacks make that switch with whites (ie making blacks outnumber whites and steal the power away from whites to give to blacks) in the same exact way that Patty Hearst was forced via brainwashing to help SLA in the 1970s do what they did when she was a member of the SLA
So if blacks and whites switch places and blacks have the power, majority and position in the US that whites had in the US in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s 1990s and the whites are have the lack of power that blacks had in the US in 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s (even if it happened through racial justice advocacy), I would be more than fine with that.
My reasons would be for the reasons I wrote in the above paragraphs and also because it would shake up our boring societal structures and be a solid to blacks for centuries of abuse and dehumanization that blacks evidently endured from whites , in particular from white Imperialists, Capitalists, Democrats , Bush league Republicans, Cruzites etc
In that hypothetical would , I would continue to show solidarity with blacks even when they are in the majority and in power . The above world would obviously a good thing for them
Wokeness against blacks from minorities in that world would not happen and they would not be penalized for being in the majority . Affirmative Action and quotas for whites wouldn't exist in that hypothetical world where blacks flip it on whites and I would be fine with that
Of course in the above hypothetical world, I would be the sort of ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalist based on the Scottish model who blurs the line of being a ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalist based on the Scottish model and something that is between an Alex Nalvhany Nationalist/Tucker Carlson Alt Left Patriot (Patriot not Nationalist and a Alt Left version of a Tucker Carlson Patriot, not a Left Wing version of it or a generic version of it) and a Paleoconservative
I would also, in that hypothetical world, try to help whites who are upset about being in the minority not be upset about that change through getting their minds off of politics.
I am cool with the Black Liberation Army and I show solidarity with people who show solidarity with them
I believe that Transracial (identity) is a real concept and I support Transracial rights
I support Interracial Marriage because I am an Anarcho Libertarian which means I believe that the government should have NO SAY WHATSOEVER in who people of any races/ethnicities marry
The sad thing is 41 percent of interracial married couples divorce by year 10 of their marriage (compared to 31 percent of same race married couples). So anti interracial marriage racists don't even need to try to stop interracial marriages. However, I'd like to help decrease the divorce rate for interracial marriages so it drops from 41 percent to 31 percent. But since I am not a marriage councilor I guess I can't do that.
The National Anthem should not be played at sporting events but if it is, if people want to protest it they should stay in the locker room or kneel on the field after the game. I do believe that the anthem kneelers were being peaceful so that is a plus for them. But i don't protest them kneeling during the anthem because its not my place to do so
The Black National Anthem is divisive and rubs people the wrong ay. There is only ONE National Anthem, for ALL Americans regardless of race or ethnicity.
Having a national anthem for race or ethnicity goes against everything our country stands for . We are ONE America not White America, not Black America, not Hispanic America, Not Asian America.
However I support the black power symbol by those athletes at the 1968 Olympics.
Meena Harris said ignorant comments. White Males are NOT the biggest 'terroristic' threat to this country. Those comments she made are wrong and divisive (unless I stepped into a dimension warp). She can't be very intelligent or thoughtful person if she makes ignorant comments like that
White people don't make up the majority of mass shooters and statistics back this up
Colin Kaepernick's trollish filled Tweet on July 4 2020 was cringe, divisive and grrrrrrrrr.
The US is not a White Supremist country and its not a white supremist act to celebrate Independance Day. I do approve of his July 4 2011 patriotic ,non anti white tweet.
Because I am a 49ers fan, I am lenient with Colin (at least deep down inside or systematically)
I like the non woke ways Afterschool specials in the 1970s 1980s and early mid 1990s dealt with racial issue
Children/disabled
school/work
I am against colleges removing studies of ‘dead white males’ from course of Western history and similar studies
The government should not fund universal pre school.
I support some slight decentralization of education. I am ok with opt outs on testing and reimagining the Boards of Regents
I support expanded work based learning systems for high school students so they are prepared for life after high school/college/grad school and since it adds more work for them in school sort of making up for them being deprived of working more hours in school. I am also open to a K-10 model reducing the span of school to get young people ready to work
We need nuanced ideas to help teachers do their jobs without worrying about the left firing them for not towing the line. To do this, we must focus on restorative justice and building community relations
We must help students thrive in school. To do so we must increase funding for vocational training, socio emotional learning. This would include, trauma support, change adjustment, loss, economic vulnerability and similar hinderances to their success.
To address holes in our graduation rates where they exist, we need to find and apply new pathways to keep students and young people engaged while as mentioned above preparing them for the future. We must use philosophy over money to achieve this. New ideas to do these things is a must.
There is a value in school choice. We need a nuanced approach along with promoting collaboration between charter (private) and public schools, so different school systems can learn about what is working and implement some of those alternative models that are attracting and catering to various types of students in our communities.
School choice should not be viewed as a financial thing but instead promote public schools collaborating with award winning charter (private) schools on their school models that resonate with young people which bridges gaps, inspires and lights a fire under modern day students
Private (charter) schools are good too because they can meet unique student needs in a relevant way including resource classes, electives and gamified learning etc etc.
So I support school choice and am fine with charter/private schools (since I wanted it when I moved to my new town 1997 but couldn't get a voucher).
I support homeschooling
I believe homework should always be required for students in schools. I want homework to continue to be a part of schooling forever. In fact, kids should get more homework than they do now (old school like)
I believe students who disrespect their teachers should be suspended and if they don't want to come back to school then let their post suspension volunteer abscence be decriminalized. I believe that disrespectful students should be suspended. Suspending disrespectful students is the best thing for them and is a time honored method to correctify their behavior.
I believe that the Tuttle Twin books should be taught in schools and in school libraries throughout the US and Canada
I believe we should defund Academia. I believe we should defund Academia. To quote Samuel Clemens "I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first two thousand people listed in the Boston phone book than to the faculty of Harvard University"
I support Wilderness Therapy being used for behavior modification for kids, teens and even adults.
I only support the type of child 'labor' (ie home enterprise labor for children) that is in this link https://www.flickr.com/photos/56434318@N05/6620143751 (as long as its voluntary) for children around 6 and up and only if the children get paid more than adults (ideally some of said income would be put into their savings accounts until they are 18 or set aside to pay for their tuition for college)
I would also support the type of child labor that was seen at jobs like the factories and mills of Appalachia/Carolinas in the mid to late 1900s (decade) ONLY if i had proof that all of the child workers who would do those jobs had at least one past life where they lived to at least 21. Otherwise I will continue to be apolitical to firmly against child labor like that and all other types of child labor (except the 1912 home enterprise labor mentioned above)
Laws
I support Judeo Christian school students and teachers having prayer meetings after school in the parking lot (like what my former high school does) though we need to find a way to make Judeo Christian school prayer in public schools without fear of the FRFF (like Kentucky got chastied for years back)
I believe the national driving age in the US should be lowered to 14 or 15
Child values
I believe kids should be respectful to their parents, teachers and adults. People should ways be polite and not lie unless in very rare cases (ie the very rare cases that God would be fine with person lying)
I believe children who misbehave should be spanked and punished (time outs).
I am against the 'Everybody gets a trophy culture' It make it hard for kids who become adults to deal with adversity
All kids should read the Tuttle Twins books since those books teach great lessons for kids.
Disabled
I am conservative on
We need to fix our mental heath crises in this country. Mental health has to be taken more seriously by the voters, government and UN. Joe Biden should be commended for moving us in that direction
IP
In order to build a revolution to overcome our society’s Capitalism , we need to build a working class . But we can only build this revolutionary party by engaging in all relevant issues affecting the working class, which I lay out in these sections of my blog : labor (fiscal), International (anti war), Ethnic-Racial issues, Sex gender issues, LGBTQ issues, etc
Some specific forms of Socialism are better than most forms of Nationalism. I support Nationalism being replaced by those forms of Socialism. Many people I respect say that most forms of Nationalism are artificial bourgeois and a modern construct and thus I do not support most forms of Nationalism
I am against Left Wing Identity politics and Intersectionality. Even if we pretend Non white identity politics helps BIPOC, they are a false mirage and delusion for those marginalized groups and creates a bond owner mentality in going way too far in opposing anything even resembling a white identity among idenitarian platforms
I support solidarity and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy. This is a natural progression. If we have to use Banal Patriotism to get to so then we must
I satirically support American Patriotism
I am a Bill Maher type of Western values traditionalist
I support Pro Western Leftism
I believe in human rights like the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Equality is my guiding light and equality is more important than liberty. Equality comes before liberty
I don’t care for egalitarianism in the greater equality between classes sense since it is abstract and bourgeois. Classlessness (and hierarchylessness) is not the subordination of our society to universal interests like the universal notion of equality. It is about creating conditions which enables individuals to pursue their desires and interests .We need more concrete principles like opposition to exploitation on materialist grounds and economical logistics.
I support Liberal Socialist Equality as an extension of Egalitarianism as a safety net for marginalized people in case the above Marxist ‘equality by enabling individuals to pursue their desires and interests and preventing exploitation on materialist grounds and economical logistics’ methods don’t work to bring them equality and protection like when those marginalized people remain unequal or exploited on materialist grounds and economical logistics.
I believe that equality (ideally Marxist egalitarianism or regular egalitarianism if that is not viable) justice (Marxist egalitarianism or regular egalitarianism if that is not viable) and solidarity (intuitive, non woke) should be added as human rights. This would be better than not doing so and using Liberal Socialist Equality as a safety net and a bandaid
We must balance negative rights and positive rights. We should respect positive rights such as right to health (in a way that meshes with all of my combined socioeconomic views in this blog) and adequate standard of living (adequate by my standards). We should strengthen negative rights like freedom of speech and property rights .
Our great culture we have today originated in Greece, Persia, Egypt and with the Cherokee peoples (to name a few). Free Democracy was born out of that and spread to almost the whole world.
I am against postmodernism
I am not a fan of Multiculturalism.
I support a diverse form of Communitarian Multiculturalism. The strong diverse form of Communitarian Multiculturalism I support is one that has different cultures embracing what makes them unique.
This diverse form of Communitarian Multiculturalism would seek to make these cultural regions unique instead of identical. Basically this would be ANTI GENTRIFCATION since gentrification is evil and Communitarian Multiculturalism which prevents that is good.
Gentrification is evil because it sucks the soul out of unique areas making them all cheap imitations of each other like Capitalism sucks the soul out of workers making them all robots like the Tin Man in Frank Baum's Wonderful Wizard of Oz who are as identical to each other as the products they mass produce are identical to each other). There would also be autonomous worker/working class enclaves to promote workers’ rights
This would also entail some left wing cultural assimilation with the result being multiple diverse cultures in different geographical areas . This would create mutual respects for all groups within our country toward each other. There would also be autonomous worker/working class enclaves to promote workers’ rights along with some forms of Voluntary exclusion
I reject caste systems
Sadly, humans on Earth are biased by nature, and transhumanism might be a good way to fix this by implanting things into humans to remove their biases so our planet can officially and finally be cured of their bigotry forever
I am ok with what some people would call ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalism based on the Scottish model
We need traditional sacred and religious-spiritual empires which are based on traditional civic societies to battle against globalization, universalism, the bourgeois nation state and transnational progressiveness.
For that Multipolar Anti Humanist Socialism/Essentialist Socialism can be a legit weapon in the fight against Imperialism. Which is why I support the Scottish and Welsh Independence movements
If whites do become the minority one day (which will never happen and i have no problem if it does happen) and if whites no longer have perceived power one day, I would be the sort of ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalist based on the Scottish model who blurs the line of being a ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalist based on the Scottish model and something that is between an Alex Nalvhany Nationalist/Tucker Carlson Alt Left Patriot (Patriot not Nationalist and a Alt Left version of a Tucker Carlson Patriot, not a Left Wing version of it or a generic version of it) and a Paleoconservative
I would also, in that hypothetical world, try to help whites who are upset about being in the minority not be upset about that change through getting their minds off of politics.
This echos my thoughts on White Nationalism: https://web.archive.org/web/20220524210933/https://www.facinghistory.org/
At the same time, I would never tell whites they shouldn't be upset that one day, whether it is in a century or 10,000 years that their race maybe become rare or even very rare in the US or Europe.
This article makes some good points on cultures
I am a Nationalism apologist
Deep down inside, I am sort of am an involuntary Pim Fortuyn List (LPF) Nationalist
I am between viewing Conservative Nationalism as unremarkable but not controversial , and me being in the ballpark of being a Honorary True Companion of Conservative Nationalism
I am not against Ultra Nationalism . Ultra Nationialism has many positives but a few negatives too. If it can lead to a seemingly classless society and non heirachy, I'd be pragmatically open to it
We need a national revolution against the existing liberal-parliamentarian order.
It is wrong for people to complain about a woman being replaced with a man or a BIPOC being replaced by a white person (as long as the reason they were replaced was not sexist or racist in any way shape or form which in most cases is not a factor its the 2020s not the 1960s)
General SJW/cancel culture/PC
I am a fan of the IDW and endorse most of their views
SJW/cancel culture
I am against cancel culture (i believe cancel culturers should get a taste of their own medicine)
However, ask much as I loathe cancel culture, I am glad it exists. Cancel culture is fascism but its cool to see fascism (ie cancel culture) not only be acceptable in this day and age, but actually embraced by the left (the last people you'd think adopt things like that), even though I am against fascism and against cancel culture. So in that way, cancel culture is more of a silver lining I guess. Successor Ideology of the left is so counter to what they say they believe in, its hard not to be happy that they embrace such regressive things such as cancel culture fascism (again, even though I loathe fascism and cancel culture)
I am generally against SJWs.
Good quote "While I’m in full belief that even SJWs have the capacity for rational and critical thought, the fact that they choose not to employ it, even in the face of brutal facts, earns them the label of NPC. If your entire identity revolves around the superficial, and your entire belief system revolves around instructions from someone else, then you’re about as good as a computer program. If you won’t engage in civil debate, and instead scream tired phrases at people when you run out of things to say, then there’s no person there, just a shell that somebody else is speaking through"
PC
I am against Censorship
I am against political correctness but i am not quite as harsh on them as Dave Rubin is at his worse. Political correctness isn't wrong every time so keep that in mind
I hate political correctness because it is annoying, demonizes innocent things like things below , is more mainstream leftist trash, pussifies people etc. I can’t read the news anymore due to fears I will see some more political correctness. Political correctness triggers me and pushes further to the right. Political correctness is further evil because it is a slippery slope and false equivalency . I want to destroy and end political correctness forever. No more letting liberals get away with that trash. I have gone mad because of political correctness and I want to destroy the PC police. PC has made me depressed and lose faith in humanity
I am against colleges (such as the ones in this linke https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2021/06/14/woke-backlash) restricting freedom of speech and being far left extremist schills
This article tries to play devil’s advocate to safe spaces while agreeing with some anti safe space points. I am myself an anti safe spacer
There is NOTHING offensive about the 1964 Rudolph Red Nosed Reindeer movie
There is nothing offensive about A Cat in the Hat Comes Back
There is NOTHING offensive about the puking scene in Ace Ventura. It was more mocking Ace for being ignorant than mocking trans people
There is nothing offensive about the movie Airplane (ie there was nothing offensive about that jive scene by Barbara Billingsley)
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE INACCURATE WAYS THAT ANIMALS ARE PROTRAYED IN ENTERTAINMENT , ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS AN IDIOT
The song Baby It's Cold Outside is not a date rape song and it should be left alone and be as mainstream as it was in the mid 2010s and prior since it was first released. It should not have been a victim of PC snowflakes (pun intended) who are jealous that Dean Martin will always be more famous and cooler than they could ever be.
There is nothing offensive about Beverly Hills Cop III
There is NOTHING offensive about the term 'black ice'
THERE IS NOTHING OFFENSIVE ABOUT BUGS BUNNY EATING CARROTS
There is NOTHING offensive about Christmas Story (1983 movie)
There is NOTHING offensive about the name Clown Face Nebula. Not one person would possibly be offended by that name (who the fuck would be offended by that term? clowns? the nebula itself? GTFO with that junk)
There is NOTHING offensive about using these terms: blind alley, blind side, blindspot, grandfathered in, lame, long time no see, psyched. There is nothing wrong with the word crazy being used in pop culture to name things to name things (like Cameron Crazies, the rapper Krazy, the song Crazy in Love by Beyonce, Bugs Bunny's Crazy Castle etc). There is nothing wrong with using the word lunatic being used in pop culture to name things (like Lunatic's Pandora in FF VIII, or the name Looney Tunes etc)
I don't find Ari's treatment of Lloyd in Entourage offensive, it's so over the top it can't be taken seriously, and Ari loves Lloyd (not like that).
I hope countries in the former Soviet Union as well as in France continue to use the word "Eskimo" as a generic name, not a trademark, for chocolate covered ice cream with a wooden stick to handle it.
Ghettopoly might be seen as somewhat mildly offensive if you over analyze it . But Ghettopoly doesn't offend me
There is NOTHING offensive about Goonies (1985 movie)
There is NOTHING offensive about Horton Hears a Who
There is nothing wrong a out kids buying ice cream from a neighborhood Ice cream truck, and there is nothing wrong with neighborhood ice cream trucks in the first place
There is NOTHING offensive about the way people are portrayed on Disney's Jungle Cruise ride pre 2020s
There is NOTHING offensive about Kelly in MWC wearing a Stars and Bars jacket since it was only seen for a few seconds on screen
There is NOTHING offensive about Mike Tyson's Punch Out
There is NOTHING offensive about Pepe le Pew (Pepe does not cause rape just like violent video games don't cause violence and Islam doesn't cause Islamic terrorism) There is nothing offensive about him being French, it's light hearted mocking of French people.
There is NOTHING offensive about Porky Pig stuttering
THERE IS NOTHING offensive about the Prince kissing Sleeping Beauty while she is sleeping to wake her up. That is not date rape. It is totally inoffensive
There is NOTHNIG offensive about the Splash Mountain Disney ride
There is NOTHING offensive about Super Mario Odyssey
The term 'doo rag' pc criticism on Survivor went overboard. Maybe that term has some negative conations and the person on Survivor who complained about that term was a teacher who studies race, ethnicity and CRT like subjects so I can live with him complaining about the doo rag since he complains about that stuff for a living but he went too overboard with that pc stuff
There is NOTHING offensive about Tasmanian Devil. He is NOT ABELIST.
There is NOTHING offensive about the song 'Whistle while you work'
There is NOTHING offensive about snow being called white or the term 'white as snow'
There is NOTHING offensive about the term 'white christmas' or the song White Christmas , only cold hearted, Grinch Scrooge freaks would take offense with those terms
I call a few hypothetical races-ethnicities of intelligent life extraterrestrials who live in other solar systems, galaxies and universes who are warmongering, pillaging ruffians 'guardians' (after Guardians of the Galaxy).
The Edmonton Elks should be renamed the Bambi, Deer in the Headlights, or the English version of the word ayaxkyimewathat , which sounds very similar to the word Eskimo that was used by some Native people in the Arctica area to refer to people who speak a different language. The name would be to refer to Canadians of all races and ethnicities who speak a different language and would have nothing to do with Native people.
Edy's Pie should go back to being named Eskimo Pie. Eskimo Pie is not offensive and only far left extremists who need mental help think its offensive.
The Washington Commanders NFL team should be renamed the Hogs, Redhawks, Braves (their original name but here it means the value of Bravery in all humans regardless of race or ethnicity, nothing to do with Native Americans or Native American culture), Capitol Tornadoes (2nd name was who they were a remnant of), Indians
I want professional sports teams in other solar systems, galaxies or universes using these names for their professional sports teams on their planets: Pepes (after Pepe the Frog with Pepe as their mascot), Groypers (better there than here) and Snowflakes (as an insult name to the left PC people from our planet) . Maybe I'll get SETI to help me send out a message to intelligent life extraterrestrials in other solar systems, galaxies or universes ,requesting that they name some of their professional sports teams on their planets the Pepes (after Pepe the Frog with Pepe as their mascot), Groypers (better there than here) and Snowflakes (as an insult name to the left PC people from our planet)
I want to get intelligent life extraterrestrials in other solar systems, galaxies and universes to use Jynx (from Pokemon) as a cartoon character in some of their cartoons and anime. Maybe I'll get SETI to help me send out a message to intelligent life extraterrestrials in other solar systems, galaxies or universes requesting that use Jynx (from Pokemon) as a cartoon character in some of their cartoons and animeon their planets
There is nothing wrong with people dressing up for cosplay or in costumes for Harvest in ways that perputate gender norms or gender stereotypes. In fact I RECOMMEND that people dress up in cosplay and for Harvest in costumes (if they celebrate Harvest) in ways that perputate gender norms and gender stereotypes as a way to FU SJWs
I am neutral to lean pragmatically agree that it is ok to kids and adults to wear Native American costumes for Harvest and for Cosplay assuming they had advice about such costumes from SJW Native American activists on how to pull it off without offending people I have an inner pro cultural appropriation streak in me
Crime
I am against the three letter agencies like the FBI violating the civil liberties of Americans . From going after parents who protest the CRT, to their raids on former Trump officials, to the illegal spying it is clear our civil liberties are being threatened by these bullies
My views on the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mara Lago estate generally echo Fox News views on this. That raid was petty, partisan, over the top and in bad taste. It could have been handled better by the FBI, at the very least.
I use to be radically anti authority but I mellowed out due to SJWs making me more sympathetic to authority
I am against trolls making death threats against and harassing Supreme court justices over their Roe v Wade ruling. Those trolls should be prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law. If it was pro life protestors doing that to pro choice judges, the MSM and left would be in a uproar
I am against those fringe pro choice protestors harassing churches and pro life centers over Roe v Wade. Those fringe pro choice protestors should be prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law
The Denver PSL organizers should not have been arrested as they did nothing wrong in their 2020 protests . The PSL have always been anti police long before BLM existed, so its to be expected the PSL would protest against police, its not like it was a non anti police group protesting police violence in which case I would back off
I support Justice Action (Australia). They help prisoners who are often victims of punitive and harsh punishments and I applaud the work they do in helping them
I am generally against some aspects of Criminal Justice Reform. I believe being tough on crime is a well intentioned effort to fight against crime.
I am neutral lean support for a bill that would enhance hate crime data collection but only to be used as a rough spiritual outline and to provide community centered solutions to assist hate crimes victims and their communities etc
There is no way to know who commits more crimes against Asians (I feel the Project Veritas report is a bit suspect so I can’t trust it). But blaming whites for Asian hate crimes is ‘color of crime’ rhetoric and thus wrong
Some stats do show whites do commit the majority of hate crimes in America (53% of hate crimes); far more than blacks do (23 percent)
Crimes committed by blacks should be reported the just as much and in the same exact way as crimes committed by whites are reported.
I am alt far centrist on whether I believe that blacks commit more crimes against whites than non whites do.
I have seen many horror stories of murders committed by all races and ethnicities against each other, each horrific in their own unique way.
I don't believe it is racist to say that one race commits more crime against another race, I believe it is just impulsive bordering on Archie Bunker ignorant, misses the bigger point and doesn't do anything to address such violence along in a meaingful way and thus it allows all violence to continue since by pointing fingers instead of making our communities safer from criminals of all races and ethnicities they are showing they care less about people and more about political games.
I condemn people disrespecting the police (like throwing things at them, spitting on them, harassing them, calling for violence against them). I echo some of David Clarke’s pro police views
The police should not be defunded or abolished. We need to build more positive relations with therapists, social workers, Religious leaders/Chaplains and similar agencies in our communities to help tag along with police and maybe be guest police at times for specific non violent crimes freeing police officers to focus on areas of our communities where they are needed.We also need to get police to deescalate instead of escalate dangerous encounters with perps.
If misled people want to stop perceived police brutality, police departments across the country should hire BLM members and anti police brutality activists as police officers since they would be the least likely people to use brutality on suspects.
Blacks call the police more than non blacks so its counterproductive for them to get the police abolished or even defunded (since the latter hampers police)
I do wish all police in the US were like Andy from the Andy Griffin show (ie that all police in the US were friendly, compassionate lawmen who want people to respect them for their integrity and commitment to justice, rather than fear them for their gun (which they should rarely carry)
If the police are abolished we'll have vigilantism which would be a positive side effect of that so maybe the police being abolished wouldn't be that bad if it lead to vigilantism (like in the Death Wish movies but ONLY if vigilantes comply with this former police officer's guidelines for police officers http://normstamper.com/about . Another good thing is if we abolish the police we can make gun ownership a human right and everyone can stock up on guns and get easier access to guns. But in that world , 1870s-1960s NRA like training , voluntary gun self control (instead of the 1870s-1960s NRA’s gun control) and similar measures would need to be implemented to make that practical along with a new criminal justice system based on the democratic organization of the working class and its right to defend its class interests on the basis of solidarity and unity
At worst I wouldn't mind seeing the Guardian Angels brought back and expanded throughout the US and used in place of cops in some specific instances.
I am against Rashida Tlaib's senseless, illogical proposal to empty prisons. Prisons (all prisons) should be a fixture of society and getting rid of prisons is one the worst ideas I have ever heard. I will fight to make sure she never gets her way with that. Though less prisons= less right wingers in prisons, but whatever
I am mixed on Ban the Box
I am against the Death Penalty being legal however there is something intriguing about people celebrating inmates being executed (like people watching gladiator fights in the Colisseum) in that it is not something you except in the modern era but that evil hypocritical anti life behavior of those people celebrating executions and the Death Penalty itself is still wrong. Any pro death penalty person should learn what its like to go through being on death row before they decide support the death penalty. In saying that, at worst, not allowing the executed criminal know they are being executed (like how Cyril O'Reilly was lead to be executed without knowing he would be executed) is less offensive than the alternative
Drugs/Alchohol/Stealing
I am against Fentanyl, Cocaine ,Heroin, LSD , Purple Haze, Synthetic Marijuana, Crystal Meth and
I am empathetic to support non synthetic Marijuana being legalized for medical use. I also am open minded to to possibly able to live with one or the other:
Either have non synthetic Marijuana always being illegal for rec use but at the same time giving cops the option and maybe encouragement to not enforce non synthetic Marijuana laws which I knowingly know that they would not enforce the vast majority of the time effectively making non synthetic Marijuana legal for rec use
OR have non synthetic Marijuana be legal for rec use on the condition that the user grows it themselves and doesn't give it to anyone they don't live with or are real close to and doesn't sell it (but they get no help from the government or state in growing it) AND they only can grow a limited amount in addition (not set in stone) along with them paying a high dowry/tribute along with relatively high taxes to the government state for growing it .Something like what George Soro advocated for here https://www.georgesoros.com/1997/02/02/the-drug-war-cannot-be-won/ in the 1990s but that jives with the above
I don't care if non synthetic Marijuana is decriminalized for rec use as long as the penalty for it is noticeably more than the penalty for Oregon hard drug users who are caught with hard drugs in addition to requiring non synthetic Marijuana users who are caught with weed to do community service (not a lot just the amount i did for my confirmation).
Drug trafficking should always be illegal with drug traffickers going to prison for that for years
All jobs should drug test employees for Marijuana, Cocaine (powder and injection),
I am between somewhat support and symbolic support for legalizing hemp
People should NOT use Marijuana (unless they can give me a 'good excuse'), Cocaine (powder or injection), Heroin, LSD, Crystal Meth, Purple Haze or
I am half heartily tolerant of decriminalizing brown sugar Heroin (for microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana, if they are caught with any amount above that it is prison) where the penalty for the first few times for those small amounts is a huge fine and ‘optional’ drug education while the penalty for the 4th time caught and above for those microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana is being sentenced to Attendance Centres (as in the UK) for 2 to 5 years as an alternative to prison along with allowing the extremely limited private cultivation of coca (Cocaine) to be legal in the US as in Bolivia.
I support legalizing Hydrocodone, and Oxycodone where they are legally sold just like Codeine is currently sold ie in small doses without a Px along with legalizing Naloxone
Hard drug users should be released from prison more than somewhat sooner but sent after prison to social education (with teachers who are ‘tough’) and then rehabilitation camps that are fused with private or federal halfway houses
I also support mandatory minimum sentencing for hard drug convicts only if it would allow those hard drug convicts who show good behavior and reform in prison to be transferred from prison to county jails and then to probation (they'd get less time in prison than they would with even more liberal mandatory minimum sentencing laws, but the totality of their sentencing including jail and probation would be longer than the more conservative mandatory minimum sentencing laws).
However, they would be encouraged in prison, jail and out of jail to get drug counciling and be treated in prison and jail as humane as the UN would treat them in prison and jail (without too many perks though)
Repeat hard drug offenders who refuse treatment should get way harsher prison sentences than they do now
I don't want Alcohol and Liquor to be sold at theme parks, or at outdoor restaurants.
I support blue laws and believe they should be implemented all 50 states with care and pragmatically (but 'liberally' the other type of liberally as in all over the place)
Stealing is wrong and people should go to prison for stealing.
Gun Rights
I am pro gun (B++ grade with needs improvement secondary grade from a more pro gun group than the current NRA), but I like bows and yumis and crossbows instead. I support open carry and people bringing their guns to work and similar laws.
Some gun control laws are counterproductive, they don't work, and you can't compare the US to gun restricting countries due the relative uniqueness of the US and also due to its long gun culture.
If guns are banned ,the bad people will still get illegal guns anyway (which is what pro choicers say about abortion). We've been giving gun control activists our gun rights little by little for too long. Liberals cherry pick and manipulate data to make gun owners and gun rights look bad which is more of a threat than guns themselves. Any anti gun nut would wish they had a gun in certain situations (and ideally one of the guns they usually want banned).
I support the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
I support allowing teachers to carry smart guns voluntarily in case of school shootings even though shootings are extremely rare
I support expanded red flag laws over Universal background checks
I would not be triggered, upset, depressed or offended if the US brings back its 1994-2004 assault weapons ban which would also keep existing assault weapons in circulation but ban the sales of new ones because we would be going back to something we are used to, but I don’t support such a ban either. Assault weapon bans are mixed to ineffective. Most gun deaths are done with handguns, not assault rifles.
Instead I believe we should lower the amount of guns (all types) in the US to a level where we know will significantly reduce gun violence (even if it doesn’t). The US has more guns than any other country on Earth.
This does not mean via fascists coming for our guns, it just means EITHER having gun companies create a little less guns and assault weapons than they do now, and having semi private NGOs incentive people to throw away their guns
OR implement a common sense licensing policy for guns which also allows people who don’t get their gun licenses or who are deterred from getting a gun after waiting a long time for a gun license, to instead be given free stun gun-taser(s), free airsoft guns, free air free mace-pepper sprays and a free state of the art alarm system but if and when they get their gun license they have to return that stuff .
I support closing the Charleston loophole
I tolerate an initiative to create 2nd amendment sanctuaries at the local and county level gun rights sanctuary areas . With gun issues being hot button and varied this is a compromise to allow some flexibility
Also it wouldn't hurt if people were directed by gun sellers and gun people to the non bad guns if they were trying to buy the bannable types of guns.
I support smart guns to prevent innocent people from firing them (like kids) and using incentives for gun owners to get smart guns
I support making guns as restrction free to legal citizens as they are (or perceived to be by conservatives) for illegals only if illegals have more gun rights than legal citizens, otherwise, no
Gun rights also help gay people defend themselves against homophobes
We need to show liberals us gun owners aren't gun nut extremists .Good PR is a must.
We need to use better mental health counciling, deescaltion prevention techniques etc to prevent mass shootings and thus prevent the usual reactionary calls for gun control which always follow mass shootings (the media is more to blame for mass shootings than guns since the media gives the shooters the attention they seek)
I don’t think it is unreasonable for gun companies to pay a small fine when their product is used in mass shootings in order to realign incentives to deal with the issue of gun manufacturers' stocks profiting from mass shootings with their guns (though the MSM helps glorify mass shootings too so this would need to be done in conjunction with limiting the MMM’s exploitation of mass shootings
I am glad that ANTIFA is pro gun. It shows that ANTIFA is a FD++ group , albeit on their 'best' days (FD is between a F+ and D-)
It was wrong for our government to give 60,000 to the Los Zetas. We should be helping our neighbors not fighting with them
I am against the 2018 March for your life protests. Those protests were anti gun, senseless and almost as bad as the Parkland shooting itself. If I knew about those protests back then, I would have attempted to shut those protests down. In fact, I want to find every anti gun loser from those protests and force them to take back going to those protests. Those commies got their marching orders from their MSM liberal slave masters and that is almost as bad as the forced labor that is currently being done in China. David Hogg is an anti gun troll who is exploiting the death of his classmates for fame and God will make him pay for that.
Animal rights
I support Animal Welfare. Animals shouldn't have their fur be used for any purpose (they should keep their fur). It traumatizes and depresses me seeing images of animals on fur farms. Ditto for animals being used for testing and factory farms. We have to protect them. I support Germany adding Animal welfare to their constitution and Great apes getting rights
I pity people who want animals to have equal rights to humans since seeing animals being lower than humans feels like hierarchal and 'speciesist’ (like animals are dehumanized by not being equal to humans).
If I was in a world that was as conservative as 16th century Earth or 17th century Earth I would be more open to Biocentrism
But in the bible, God tells us that humans are above animals and have more value than animals but we are to protect them.
“Likewise Luke, records Jesus telling His disciples, “Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? And not one of them is forgotten before God. Why, even the hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not; you are of more value than many sparrows.”
So while we humans are above animals and we are more valuable than animals, as we obviously should be (since God made us to be superior to them and we are superior to animals), we are to protect them and not abuse that role, hence why I have my views.
I do pray that all animals after they die, get to live at least one life as a human (or as an intelligent life extraterrestrial of a species I feel is equal to humans on Earth) on Earth or another planet after they die and before they go to the afterlife so they can finally be equal to humans on Earth (i.e so if and when each animal dies they will be reincarnated as a human or intelligent life extraterrestrial of a species I feel is equal to humans at least once before going to heaven and when they do they will be equal to all humans on Earth)
This way we can say there are no human rights more than the rights of future humans on Earth now (for humans means animals, since all animals currently on Earth would reincarnate after they die to live at last one life as a human before moving onto the afterlife). Nothing is here except the power of nature
The ecological crisis that is happening is partly due to humans treating other humans like **** and dominating over them way too much which spills over to the negative way we treat animals
We need to be at one with the centrality and interconnectedness of nature. It would be much better for animals if there were fewer humans.
Maybe we can use Libertarian Municipalism to fix the above issues
I am against Zoophilia and it should stay illegal forever. Science has proven that Zoophilia causes disease and death.
I am against Critical Animal Studies and I want Critical Animal Studies to be blacklisted and censored from society.
I believe animals should be in circuses and some injured ones should then be put onwildlife conservations. I fully support the existence of Wildlife Conservations
There is nothing wrong with riding on Elephants or Camels as long as the person is light and the Elephant or Camel is in top shape and not on them for very long.
I support bull fighting and the Calgary Stampede using live animals.
I am an anti hunting activist (I am against hunting). I only retroactively support the hunting that was done in the bible and during biblical times. I also support hunting that is done in other solar systems, galaxies and universes by intelligent life extraterrestrials on their planets (as long as those ETs kill those hunts quick)
It causes me depression and sadness seeing any animal being killed. Hunting makes me cry. I want to end hunting forever and to make it so no innocent animal is killed ever again (but WAY MORE SO from a far right/paleoconservative/Ted Nugent like PRO Hunter perspective than from a liberal, snowflake, bleeding heart perspective)
Those beautiful creatures make our Earth great and for them to be savagely murdered by hunters is barbaric, archaic and flat out cruel. The joy of knowing that no innocent animal is being killed and that they get to die old and naturally offsets the sadness of a hunting ban. B
If I went to other realities and I saw all future hunted animals from our reality as humans in those realities hunting animals themselves (with guns) and I came back to our reality, then I would still be against hunting, but I'd be lean against hunting but at the same time I'd be open hearted to hunting (since those animals that hunters in our reality would hunt ,as humans in other realities hunted other animals themselves)
I am not against fishing, but I am not a fan of people fishing at all since I feel fishing is murder (though I am fine with people doing catch and release, or mercy killing a fish). The type of fishing outside of those 2 things I am fine with is fishing that was done in the bible and in Israel during biblical times
I am against people hitting pets to discipline them (and even if they do so lightly). People should never hit their pet under any circumstance unless it is in self defense and even then with a focus on de escalation and not hurting their pet.
I am against goose egg addling and I feel that should be illegal
Voting
elections
I support ranked choices voting
I support non partisan primaries
I am ok with Georgia's voting id laws and Texas's voting id laws, but I am conditionally open hearted to abolishing said laws in those states and going back to the 2010s (more liberal) Georgia and Texas voting laws if we can convince potential political alliance people in Georgia and Texas to use all of the tricks that the Democrats used in Georgia and Texas in the 2010s to whether fairly or unfairly get their Democrats elected but to get people in our political alliance elected instead.
People need photo ids to do a lot of things they should need them to vote also for no other reason as to give the appearance of a fair election even if its already fair without that requirement.
I believe that strict non photo Municipal Ids (for people who can't get ids) and strict, non photo ids (for people who can get ids) should be required for people when they go to vote along with strict reading of the voter rolls.
Voters who have a reasonable impediment to getting an id should be able to vote
People should be required to register before they vote (that is one issue i will never be 'liberal' on)
I am against the John Lewis voting rights act but not John Lewis who didn't need a rigged voting act for him to be elected for office over his political career. Lewis was a man of character and a Patriot. Making it that easy to vote leaves it open to abuse at best and is just a reactionary thing to the Georgia voting laws at worse which means it is rushed and punitive which is not something a law should be filled with
Ideally we should vote like on Wikipedia during Arbcom elections, everyone votes as many times as they want.
We also need people after every election to thoroughly reading and checking the voter rolls
I am against removing or replacing the Electoral college.
I support First past the post voting
I am against Instant runoff voting
I might be in the realm of being open to direct democracy replacing representive democracy and giving people a more clear picture of political things but ideally it would be better done somewhere else or done experimently (but then again such voting may have prevented the 2020 Presidental election steal so there is that)
DC should not become a state
Former felons should not vote under the vast majority of circumstances but if I find out that most felons are conservatives (due to persecution of conservatives in the age of Joe Biden) then I may rethink that opposition
Prison inmates should only vote on things related to their prison. But if I find out that most prison inmates are conservatives (due to persecution of conservatives in the age of Joe Biden) then I may rethink that opposition
I would be lying if I said I did not believe that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden. There is just too much smoke not to be fire, see these links along with this line of thinking: If the election wasn’t stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden, the Democrats and their allies wouldn’t be acting the way they have/do on the topic of possible election fraud . The Democrats and their allies (including the MSM) aggressively canceling, smearing ,shaming and going after people who has the audacity to question the election (as if questioning the election is sone uber humongous sin that must be stamped out by the ministry of ‘truth’), is a red flag that the election might have been stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden since guilty people don’t act like the Democrats, their allies snd Joe Biden have acted.
Despite this, I am so traumatized by the fact that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden, I literally force myself 24/7 to pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election (I've been pretending that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election since late 2020
This is similar to how I use to pretend that the 2002 NFL Interconference matchups were the NFC East vs AFC East, NFC North vs the AFC West, and the NFC West vs AFC North. Similar to how in the late 1990s to mid 2000s, I use to pretend that I was born 4 to 7 years earlier in this life. Similar to how in the early 2000s, I use to pretend that a decade earlier (in the late 1980s and early 1990s) I was a cast member on a fictitious kids variety show in a sunbelt state that was similar to The Electric Company, Kids Incorporated and that variety show that Wade Robson's character mentioned that he was a cast member of in that Full House episode, with some future late 1990s-early 2000s pop stars (I further use to pretend that me and those future late 1990s-early 2000s pop stars hung out together off set of those shows when filming was not going on). Similar to how I use to pretend that during the 1996 NFL season, the Jets beat the Eagles, Oilers and the Colts at the Meadowlands.
However, unlike those pretending examples above, I will continue to pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election, until the day I die.
However, if I am asked to share my view of whether I believe that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen, even though I pretend that the Democrats and Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election 100 percent fair and square and that there was no election fraud in that election, I have to state my true view on that question (that the Democrats and Joe Biden stolen that election). The reason is lying is wrong, and while I 24/7 pretend that the 2020 Presidential election was won 100 percent fair and square by the Democrats and Joe Biden, I would be being as dishonest as the Democrats and Joe Biden were in stealing that election if I didn't state that my true view on that question (that the Democrats and Joe Biden stole that election)
I would never try to stop the transfer of power but I support the congress people trying to stop the certification of the election results in 2020 to ask for a recount (ideally that objection should have been done privately in December 2020 like it was done or would have been done privately in December 2016 if due to the opposition to certify the 2016 election victory of Donald Trump but the so called sedition caucus was right to what they did none the less). But I support Republicans who voted against objecting to the election results in Arizona and Pennsylvania
I believe that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. But there are alternate realities where Barack Obama's clones were born in Kenya (Many Worlds Interpretation/Multiverse). Even though Barack Obama was born in the US (and spent most of his childhood and youth growing up in the US, albeit off the mainland in a very new state -Hawaii) , he did spend a big chunk of his childhood and youth living in Indonesia which means, that while he is a legal US citizen his whole life, he isn't as firmly entrenched in American culture as people who spent more time or their whole childhood and youth living in the US since Obama lived in Indonesia for many years as a child and youth.
Even if Barack Obama was born in Kenya, I believe he should have been eligible to be President since his mother was a lifelong American citizen and in Judaism, to be considered 'fully Jewish' all you need is for your mother to be Jewish, so why not apply that here too (even though they aren't Jewish). The birther thing could have backfired if the Republicans got their way with it since Patriot and AmericanFirster Ted Cruz ,unlike Barack Obama, was born in a foreign country.
White Replacement Theory is a myth. But isn't a myth is there a rightfully demographics changes via migration (more migrants the merrier, bless their hearts) and that is a factor (along with millions of other factors) in Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition winning elections . Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition yield to overkill mass migration (if that is an exaggeration by hard Right border-hawks I take this back) and mass illegal immigration
Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition are, rightfully or wrongfully so pro illegal immigration for political reasons (even though I wrote below isn't 100 percent correct, as changing Hispanic voting patterns demonstrate).
Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition are more likely than our red green brown coalition to protect illegal immigrants (which is a good thing but for shady reasons) and allow them to stay here and it very well could be because they know somewhere inside or systematically that illegal migrants are (or potentially more) more likely to vote the way we don’t want them to vote.
Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition betray this line of thinking by them by making it easier for illegal immigrants to vote when illegals probably should not be allowed to vote until they become citizens or citizenish (i.e through Amnesty, Path to Citizenships, DACAs etc).
They further do this by trying to get rid of voter ids. (if Democrats and Republicans outside of our red green brown coalition didn’t heavily restrict all types of migration many many years ago, they wouldn’t need to make up for that in spades now which leads to intrusive and unsustaining mass illegal immigration)
In return those illegal immigrants out of gratefulness (whether real , perceived or imaginary) by and large vote Democrat, toxic Center right Republican, RadCon (radical Conservative) than vote the way we want them to vote
This does not cause our country to be non white, it causes our country to be more non red green brown coalition colors
This might even help the Democrats in particular and more so who are outside of our red green brown coalition
In Texas for example, Bill Richardson said that there used to be more open this agreement between the Democrats and illegals but over time, the Democrats made it more and more covert as to not let this get out. I don’t think there is anything sinister or official like that now with illegals and Democrats, but even the appearance of that whether right or wrong is concerning
In 2003, John Judis and Ruy Teixeira wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority. In this book, they said that Democrats were building a new electoral coalition where white America is supplanted by multicultural (multiracial and multi ethnic) society.
Nine years later, in 2012, The Washington Post wrote "The story of this election will be all about demographics... Rather than reverting to the older, whiter, more male version (of America's electorate) Republicans had hoped for, it continues to be defined by what Ron Brownstein has called the 'coalition of the ascendant' -- minorities, young voters, and college educated whites, particularly women"
In 2013, the Center for American Progress said, "Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future."
But it's so obvious this is the case, that it is an insult to Americans to deny there is something, no matter how ‘insignificant’ to this. Joe Biden told BIPOC after he 'won' the 2020 Presidential Election 'you had my back now I got yours's. It's the same with Democrats/Liberals and illegals. But I commend the Democrat politicians loyalty to their voting base
Donald Trump’s years of exploiting illegal migrants to do labor for him helped him get Latino swing voters due to the Latino community’s loyalty for such work, ditto for Mitt Romney, Marjorie Greene (who exploits illegal migrants to work for her at her small business who then in turn become loyal shills for her)
The Democrats want to tie Republican positions with White power (though not that I can blame the Democrats for doing that no matter how seemingly inaccurate it is due to the Richard Spencer Alt right infiltration of the MAGA Alt right in 2016 and the Democrats realizing that Republicans move further and further right recently due to the liberals growing more ‘extreme’ causing many Republicans to have nowhere right to go but alt right).
But none to less, the Democrats do this to take voters away from our alliance’s candidates. It is smart politics but it gets old fast. Deceitful politics don't care about the truth, a small but harsh fraction of polemics use all tools to destroy us (and we do the same but not quite as much)
As great as the 1964 Civil Rights act was, it caused a slippery slope with workers who are drugees , workers who cause workplace discrimination and divisiveness (which prevents workers uniting to overthrow capitalism) , illegal migrants (who don’t meet any amnesty conditions), pedos , hetereo and gay couples who can’t get a room, the CRT in schools etc. It also might wrongly cause a Christian worker (not owner) who leaves work to avoid baking a cake for a gay couple’s wedding in danger of being arrested for ‘discrimination’
Moreover it lead to equity ‘quotas’, which go against the very nature of that act
We have to amend the 1964 Civil Rights act to either fix that or prevent slippery sloping that would go beyond those things into extreme left territory .
International issues (war/international relations/issues in other countries etc)
Military/Isolationism/Wars in general
Neocon warmonger John Bolton is the enemy of our planet as his imperialism and unapologetic crusades have left destruction in countries at every turn. Liberals love slurping up any Cold War propaganda if they can use it against Donald Trump or his close allies
I am anti war most of the time but I am anti war due to Lockean love of Liberty and being anti government (ie war is big gov). Basically I am anti war for the same reasons Mark Twain was anti war.
Since I am defacto anti war/not supportive of wars, I am by default against all countries on Earth going to war/me non supportive of all countries on Earth going to war . For example, after the outbreak of each war I check to see if an extremely rare and overwhelming case for me supporting that war being waged exists and if it doesn't I keep my default anti war/not supportive position on that war. It takes more for me to support a war than for me to not condemn a war. I haven't supported a war since I supported the Iraq War in early 2003 (before changing my mind in March 2003 and being against the Iraq War)
I am very pro Military and very pro Veteran despite being anti war
I support Ronald Reagan’s military spending
I support the Peace Tax Fund – H.R. 1947. Religious freedom means freedom from senseless wars and violence
I am against the Open Skies Treaty
I value peace among the various countries on Earth.
I am an Isolationist
I support the independence of all US territories
I am fine with Left Neoconservatism in rare instances
I am an Anti Imperialist. I especially oppose wars that impose western values on non western countries
I am an Anti Globalist and we need to go to war with globalism so to speak to make our world better. I am a fan of radical localism especially all the way down to the individual
I am warming up to trying to be open hearted to tolerating a multipolar world which would be a confederation of traditionalist regional empires united under Russian soveignerity that will defeat postmodern demographies. I feel these fellow multipolar countries would keep Russia in line and prevent Russian aggression better than NATO does
I was and I still am against the Patriot Act
I do not agree with Sully's view that Donald Trump showed 'utter and vulgar disrespect and contempt' for US troops past and present. Trump treated the US military mostly decent to good as President. The Atlantic's report that Donald Trump had called WWI heroes 'suckers' and 'losers' is FAKE NEWS and NOT TRUE AT ALL. Sully has to admit that Barack Obama was much worse as President for our military than Donald Trump and that Jesse Ventura's comments about our military is are way worse than anything that Donald Trump ever said about them as President. Of note, I do think its cool that such a virtue signaling military man like Jesse Ventura had anti military views but he should not get a pass for them when Donald Trump's innocent (but fake) comments don't
I-P
I support Israel's right to exist. I favor the Allon Plan to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allon_Plan
Since the early 2000s, while I am morally (moral as in moral victory) Pro Israel, I always temporarily shift to being PPIABAN (Pro Palestine In All But a Name) before going back to being morally (as in moral victory) Pro Israel. Its just the Israel-Palestine conflict is so deep, complicated, violent and fluid, it's hard to get a handle on that issue (war/conflict is hell)
I admire Israel for being so unique and for the passion and unity that Israelis have for their country and people.
We shouldn't fight against Israel since God's pushes his nautral will by doing things that are at times seemingly against all countries on Earth, including Israel (but for good reasons not antisemetic reasons, and not to punish per say, just a 'karma thing due to how you lived' type of thing and done subtly a la Butterfly Effect). So let God be the one to do those things to them (which furthers his will).
According to Christian scripture, God will restore Israel on Earth when Jesus comes,and based on world events ,that seems to be the direction our world is headed. The kingdom may be more spiritual and on a spiritual plane or literal (think X Files type supernatural) so from those perspectives its futile to fight against Israel anyway.
We shouldn't care what happens in Israel anyway since we are America Firsters and our first priority is the US.
Israelis are non liberal and Palestianians are slightly more anamatheic to the Paleolibertarian, Green Brown red cause than Israelis. Paleolibertarians and the green brown red need all the help they can get and sometimes you have to let people you don't agree with help you defeat the political factions who are opposed to your factions, even if that means help from Israelis/Jewish people (which I have no issues with). Paleolibertarians and red green brown also need Palestinians to fight for the cause at some point too since they are also non liberal, but they are much less important to the cause than Israelis are.
I intuively pity Hamas and Hezbollah. I believe Hamas and Hezollah aren't as bad as the MSM makes them out to be. Both groups are basically Hero Antagonists with Blue and Orange morality the borders on Gray morality.
Hamas ,when they aren't killing innocent Israelis, do seem they care about their people. But they need to stop being so violent and militant to show the rest of the world this and to garner sympathy in their cause.
I admire Hezbollah for their unique military and their fighting spirit. They are defending Lebanon. God never gave Lebanon to the Jews or Israel. Hezbollah has done much senseless 'terrorism' and that is condemnable.
I do kind of agree with the author of this: https://
Based on that article above, one possible solution would be to install an Anarcho Monarchism system in Israel/Palestine and then to install the Neturei Karta as a monarch dynasty counterposed against the state (Israel) as a representive not only for the Palestianians but for the Anti Zionist Orthodox Jewish people in Israel/Palestine who feel that the true Israel won't exist until Jesus comes back to Earth and reforms it himself and that the current Israel is more about Israelism and less about Judaism.
I have no issues with Wikipedia user Volunteer Marek's views on Poland and WWII and I feel it wouldn't hurt for my fellow conservatives to have their views on Poland and WWII align with Volunteer Marek's views on those topics
I would have opposed H. Res. 951 (if I was following politics back then) like Ron Paul opposed it. I also echo everything that Paul said in his statement in this article . I retroactively oppose H.Res 951 because I am Libertarian and an AmericanFirster
The BDS is a mixed bag. They use SJW , boycott , demonizing and cancel culture methods which I abhor and loathe. They go too far at times in other areas and aren’t diplomatic (I am pro diplomacy). But the BDS are trying to humanize Palestinians and fight against IDF terrorism against Palestinians so the BDS has some positive aspects too.
If there was a Conservative version of the BDS I would consider joining it.
The BDS map should be used to build coalitions with Jewish buisness owners to find a third way/third camp solutions to the Israel settlement issues that doesn’t use SJW , boycott, demonizing and cancel culture tactics to do so, otherwise the map should be destroyed . The Jewish business owners who don’t comply should be left alone peacefully
I get Ihlan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and the UK Labour Party (under Jeremy Corbyn)’s views on Israel . I can see myself even cautiously empathizing with them on certain aspects of most of those views (the non bigoted ones) but they too go too off road at times and are closely tied to the SJW and cancel culture methods of the BDS and I abhor and loathe the SJW , boycott, demonizing and cancel culture methods of the BDS.
The Israelis are relative good guys a lot to somewhat more than most of the time (ymmv), and I am glad Israel exists (I am a non Zionist)
But when I see them stoop lower than the Palestinians (not that the Palestinians are lowly, both sides got a legit greivance its just Israel's greviance is better than the Palestians' greviance) to combat the Palestinians aggression, I go mentally off script
Israel has committed countless harsh human rights violations against the Palestinians for decades using the cover of being ‘America of the Middle East’ .
This allowed Israel to avoid blowback and scrutiny for their abuse that other Middle Eastern countries could never be afforded. They have dehumanized the Palestinians on occasion while treating them like terrorists which is Islamaphobic. When both political parties in the US are so Pro Israel and won’t even show any sympathy for the Palestinians you know it is a serious issue
These atrocities have caused pain and suffering on both sides
I get unwanted thoughts and emotions that gives me an uneasy and unshakable feeling that what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians might be similar to what China and the CCP are doing to the Uyghurs in China over the last decade or so. I know that's not true but if I see that, others do.
The Israelis and Israeli government are very wrong for doing such things to the Palestinians (its because Israel should be held to a higher standard). Some commentators have labeled Israeli's actions against the Palestinians using harsher terms than I described them as above. Those harsher comparisons were made years ago by one of Israel's military leaders along with others through the years like Yehuda Elkana, Noam Chomsky and Albert Einstein, Amos Oz and Max Blumenthal. I don't condemn those commentators for using harsher words to describe Israel's actions than I use since they are humans and call things as they see them. But I won't use those words since I basically don't see Israel's actions as that extreme.
If Israel keeps stooping lower than the Palestinians level and keeps up their abuse and human rights violations against the Palestinians, I might end up becoming more sympathetic to the Palestinians
However, I'll always be pro Israel even if Israel goes harder on the Palestinians. At worst , while I am still being Pro Israel, I would unconciously be hoping that G-d corrects Israel for their negative actions against the Palestinians literally the same exact methods he used to correct the Jews while they were roaming in the wilderness for 40 years in Exodus. Israel needs to show they are the bigger person.
I do feel the ADL is no longer the organization I proudly supported in the early to mid 2000s decade (they were more moderate and less bad decades ago but that ship has long sailed).
The ADL are not very much below average because they are Jewish or because they are a Jewish organization (I am part Jewish) but because they push partisan Democrat talking points on migration and along with the SPLC influence a lot of less than desirable policies (many to most of which are not ideal or not even decent) and defame nearly all things conservative (just like the SPLC does).
The ADL has influence over our society on issues that have nothing to do with protecting us (Jewish people) from monsters. This includes the ADL’s online censorship pledges, migration (its fine they go after anti semetic xenophobes but they just spew progressive authoritarian migration talking points out of the blue and that gives me pause)
The ADL should empathize with good faith non bigoted borderhawks instead of criticize them since the ADL wants the same thing for Israel that many of such borderhawks also want for the US (less illegal immigration, more migrants who are skilled, no overt open borders, Patriotism, Western Values Civic Nationalism, Manitoba multicultarism fused with Left Wing interculturalism etc).
That's why you need to take the red pill and match your views to my views on Israel so the ADL will at the very least agree to disagree with you borderhawks on migration and not smear you , otherwise I will drop you Right Wingers from our green brown red alliance
I do agree with more than a few to even more than things the ADL says and I am glad they fight for Israel and me, when so many liberals are turning on Israel and hitting to close to home (i.e day of rage aggression).
George Soros who is a thoughtful, intelligent , global treasure. Soros is spot on about how the things about China’s authoritarian leftism I don’t support. Soros is right about the great reset
However, he has unofficial followers who interpret or warp his more revolutionary transnational progressive views in their own ways and into their own views.
Those disciples also through their activism (like NGOs) have a less than stellar influence on world politics over the last few decades (they are of all races, ethnicities, sexes and religions and not more or less one than the other) who are doing those things.
Soros only donates through his foundation to those progressive causes, but he has quite the following of people who take his views and make it their own thing to spread their version of Soroism around the world and without his consent
We need to be resistant to these activists and NGOs who are doing this by using the same methods they use in order to effectively counter it and peacefully. We should also pray for them.
They even smear Jewish people as spreading antisemetism.
They are not evil. They just go too far in pushing for some causes and leave George Soros open to conspiracy theories galore.
Soros being Jewish has nothing to do with him or his actions. If he was from Mars, he'd still have followers who do the same things he never told them to do in the exact way they do them now
These followers have been a factor in destabilizing our JudeoChristian values pushing for things which are anamatheic to Judeo Christian and SBNR values. Liberal democracies have gone after these followers in the past
Some things these followers push for include diversifying the oppressor classes instead of abolishing the oppressor classes, pushing for illegal drugs to be legalized (to be fair, at least as late as 1997 George Soros had and may still have some decent points on drugs that any Libertarian should consider, but his liberal disciples will push further left on that issue), prostitution, LGBTQ things in elementary schools, kids being exposed to drag queens and other cringe center left/left center things with his followers going further in forcing those things on our society.
Moreover ,Soros himself did currency manipulation etc in crashing the Bank of England.
Soros migration crisis plan has been inconsistent as it has caused problems for illegal migrants and European countries alike since it leaves illegal migrants in limbo land, and because Europe can barely afford to take in many more illegal migrants or even mass migrants
I hope and pray that Soros has a Ebenezer Scrooge like change to become conservative so his followers can convert to our red green brown alliance (since they are an easier catch as conservatives) and so he can donate to some conservative causes and organizations we support
China-Russia
I try to view China like the PSL and Fourth International Theory do but…
The 2022 Winter Olympics being played on schedule while the 2020 Summer Olympics weren't played on schedule seems hypocritical. I am against boycottting sporting events and I would not have encouraged anyone to boycott the 2022 Winter Olympics but at the same time I am fine with people boycotting the 2022 Winter Olympics. Moreover, China's political acts possibly should have also played a factor in not granting them those Winter Olympics (though i would never support denying them those winter olympics for that reason alone unless they were given the NBA finals in the mid 2020s to host or given rotional minor event to host to offset the loss of the winter olympics for that reason alone)
China is extremely wrong for their 1 2 3 child policies, for employing one word Communism (even if it employs some aspects of Capitalism), and for being anti Christian.
Moreover China is very wrong for propping up Mao Zedong who was a worse version of Joe Biden, and who committed extremely senseless murders on innocent victims. Mao is one of the worst leaders in the last century. Mao gets a E++++ grade (which is the same as F but different) with a secondary grade of Incomplete++ and a primary and secondary grade of B for effort mostly because of the mythological less bad things (ymmv) he did at the start of his run as leader of China and since Maoism is pretty decent (because it is anti Leninism, anti Marxism and a gateway ideology to better fiscal policies)
I am also against China's social credit system even if its something unique in a good way
I am apolitical on China's pandemic laws
I condemn China for getting involved in the US 2020 racial unrest situations. I also strongly condemn China for trying to make our children in this country woke through marxist propaganda
Whether China did genocide to Uyghurs or not is moot (but it was a genocide by most definitions), China still committed inhumane human rights violations against the Uyghurs and thus they are very wrong to treat the Uyghurs the way they did (at best and to say the very least). I try to see their acts through PSL’s lense but its hard not see evil in what China did
China should get all of the Uyghurs to self deport back to their countries and pay them repartitions for the abuse they have done to them. Then China should allow the Uyghurs who don't self deport to be freed and given freedom but be forced to enroll in the Chinese version of the US Dignity Proposal program. If China can't help themselves become a free country, then at worst, they should then non intrusively track the Uyghurs via a Left Wing version of the same spying methods that Barack Obama/NSA used to spy on US citizens
If China used the spyingish methods on the Uyghurs that the StaSI used in East Germany on private citizens (while allowing the Uyghurs to be 100 percent free), I would look still criticize China but without the anger or passion
I believe sanctioning China for the Uyghur situation or any reason is wrong and petty as sanctions don't work most of the time. China should not be sanctioned ever unless its indefensible not to hit them with said sanctions.
China needs to be pushed to be conservative instead of being trashed so they can become a conservative ally to the US. I blindly trust they will continue to get better as a country like they always have (they are helping or something similar to helping Russia after all and are becoming less liberal on population control).
I do personally somewhat despise China for hating Donald Trump and Trump supporters and it will take a lot of moving right from China to offset that (though based on a 2000 talk with my youth group member, I will never really support China or give them any grade as a country better than a letter grade between S and B that has 4 minuses in it with a secondary grade of a letter grade between D and C with 2 pluses in it) China will be one of the countries that is evil in the last days before Christ comes after all
China should free their forced laborers and pay those laborers and all laborers doing those types of jobs using the Truck wages system-company store system that is mixed with a few payment methods from the counter economic system.
I want Hong Kong to be a UN Trust
I support Taiwan being to China what the Ukranian SSR and Byelorussian SSR were to the Soviet Union (ie Taiwan being a constituent republic-federal unit to China) . This includes Taiwan being a separate member of the United Nations separate from China and Taiwan gaining aset on the United Nations General Assembly separate from China, like the those 2 SSRs did when they were part of the Soviet Union. If Taiwan SSR ever wanted to gain independance from China SSR through a Declaration of State Sovereignty like Byelroussian SSR did in 1990 to gain independance from the USSR, Taiwan, like the Byelroussan SSR would be able to have their own legislative body before they officially became an independant country. In that situation, I'd hope Taiwan would be as close to China as Belarus is close to Russia now.
If a civil war ever broke out between China SSR and Taiwan SSR, I would support Taiwan being able to be a seperate administrative unit from China but I would be apolitical on that war.
I was against the Nuclear Freeze in the 1980s and early 1990s only because I knew that the US having Nuclear weapons was to prevent the Soviet Union from using their Nuclear weapons. To this day I am still against a Nuclear Freeze due to countries like Russia, Iran and North Korea having Nuclear weapons. I want a world free of Nuclear Weapons but I will not support a Nuclear Freeze until countries like Russia, Iran and North Korea also agree to give up their Nuclear Weapons too. No one wants a Nuclear war.
The Soviet Union was a Socialist country from the 1920s until 1991 and anyone who says otherwise is a fake historian and lunatic
Arthur Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg were TRAITORS and they should have spent many decades in prison for their treason instead of being put to death. It may seem cool for them to betray the US since you don't except liberals like them to do such things conservatives are falsely and senselessly smeared for (espionage/treasanous acts) But their evil treason caused countless deaths in Korea and they were disgusting commie terrorists and not being in prison for at least awhile would show the US was soft which would be wrong. They sold out to our enemies and they are a disgrace to the US.
I support the Anti Globalization Movement of RU (I am Anti Globalization)
I see the Russia-Ukraine conflict sort of like a Russian spring
Personally here are my views on the Russia-Ukraine conflict :
Crimea belongs to Russia not Ukraine and it should be recognized officially as such . If the Crimeans rise up and outst Russians from their region and declare their loyalty to Ukraine, I will change my opinion on this.
I support Russia going into the People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk and claiming it. The people in that province were being persecuted by Ukraine and Russia rightfully came to their aide.
I conditionally support the People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk seceding from Russia and once again becoming part of Ukraine but only under these conditions:
Condition 1) The People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk become an Autonomous Republic of Ukraine instead of going back to being an oblast of Ukraine (like Crimea is or was to Ukraine).
Condition 2) South Ossetia is recognized as part of Russia by Georgia, the UN, EU, etc
Condition 3) The People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk are allowed to have a relationship with Russia that is like the relationship those areas with Russia between 1992 and the Orange Revolution in 2004
However I am apolitical/indifferent to Russia's invasion of Ukraine after that. It's none of my business, it's their business let them deal with it. War is hell for everyone
Legality wise my views on the Russia-Ukraine conflict match the views of Russia-Ukraine conflict of the Grayzone
The US and Europe should try to de escalate the Russia-Ukraine crisis instead of inflaming it if they are going to get involved in that situation
I am Anti NATO
I was and I am still against Ukraine joining NATO, the globalist liberals help Ukraine enough as it is
Ukraine deserves criticism for not developing Donbas and leaving it open to Russia and other forces at best
I am against the Maidan Coup which was an illegal act which removed a legit elected head of state
I am against Russia being sanctioned by any countries except Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, Finland, Taiwan, Western Germany, Hungary and Estonia (if Russia was/is sanctioned by any of those countries, then i can't complain about any of those countries sanctioning Russia) If the US and others can't help themselves and must get involved in the conflict, then the CIA, MI5 etc should fly to Russia, infiltrate Vladimir Putin's inner circle and military and try to turn Vladimir Putin's inner circle and military against him like the CIA did (or tried to do) to that leader in Chile in the 1970s (against him as in not carrying out his orders and ending the war not as in deposing of him or hurting his chances to be reelected)
I hope a few of US and European sanctions and some penalties against Russia stay for years to remind Russia and Russians of who they can and cannot trust to be in a place to be their allies
I am 100 percent against the US sending troops to go to war with Russia under any circumstance barring a direct hit from Russia on our soil. I am also against the US etc setting up a No Fly Zone
I am fully against companies (like Big Tech) suspending their products and services to Russia. Russian citizens are being wrongly and punitively penalized because of their government. I call for a full boycott of every company who engages in these acts They never did this to Muslims in countries where ISIS or Al Qaeda are from, yet they do it with Russia? Hypocrite much. History will condemn Google, Microsoft, Sony for their actions with Russia. It goes against human decency, will only make Russians hate those companies and won't do anything. Hurting innocent people through refusing them service to force them to have the view you want is fascist and evil
I believe that the we should hack the bank accounts of Russian Olyriachs and force them to be bankrupt for the rest of their lives. Not because of Russia's war with Ukraine and not for any political reason but simply because they are too rich and nobody should have that much money. If we can force them into bankruptcy we can have a slow trickle effect which leads to less wealth hoarding by filthy rich trolls. No more yachts for them ,no more vacations for them, force them to live like the rest of us. They are easy and acceptable targets .But only if we can force V Ptin (or his hand picked successors) to agree to this
It is hypocritical and wrong to ban innocent Russians from entering other countries .Liberals cried over a Muslim travel ban by Donald Trump during the reign of ISIS yet they applaud this? Hypocrite much. I believe banning innocent Russians from going to other countries because of Russia going to war with Ukraine is wrong, senseless and fascist and is just as bad as Donald Trump's Muslim travel ban in 2017. I am fully against the Russia flight ban by the US and Europe. It is draconian, fascist and evil. It's also a violation of freedom of movement. I hope all Russians permanelty boycott the US and all countries that banned flights to and from Russia.
Many Russians have been unfairly fired due to their place of origin by fascist Russophobes. Their firings are a violation of Employement Acts ,since they were singled out due to their place of origin. These Russians being unfairly fired is akin to McCarthysim or what the US did to Japanese Americans right after Pearl Harbor. Freedom of speech means telling people what they don't want to hear. We must end extreme cancel culture and modern day McCarthyism
I am against Anna Nebretko getting fired by the Metropolitian Opera House. There was no reason to fire her and Peter Gelb should be fired on the spot for what he did.
I am against the Bolshoi Ballet being fired. They did nothing wrong and they were unfairly fired for no reason.
The Steele Dosier was false
Middle East/North Africa/Central Asia
Muslim world in general
Islam is not a bad religion, it's not Judeo Christianity or SBNR but it shares a link to Judeo Christianity (Abraham). It's vital that all non Christians convert to Christianity (only if it is in God’s will otherwise we must blindly trust God on this and his plans for them) but even if they don't let's hope they do so after they die by God so they get to heaven. It's for their own good
Islam has good and bad like any other religion. Not all criticism of Islam is Islamaphobic and some to a lot (but not most) of criticism of Islam is genuine and constructive. Some rarer sects of Islam do treat women and LGBTQ people horribly which is wrong. People should avoid criticizing things in Islam that they don't understand. Criticize the religion not the people in it
No religion should be free of criticism (as long as its not bigoted)
I believe that a significant small part of Mohammad Tawhid's criticism of Islam is truthiness or at least not far off from being technically correct. Tawhid is a well, relatively constructive and apparently thoughtful critic of Islam even though I disagree with him way more often than Joe Rogan would.
Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins have some valid criticisms of Islam which I don't believe is Islamaphobic but they go way too far too quick. Maher and Dawkins are reactionaries when they should be more open to Islam
I echo this https://kenanmalik.com/2013/11/14/when-does-criticism-of-islam-become-islamophobia/ and with a grain of salt pragmatically echo this https://www.texarkanagazette.com/news/2015/dec/10/these-days-it-looks-like-criticism-islam-limits/ on the issues of criticizing Islam and Muslims.
I am pathologically altruistic toward the non bigoted (using my grandparents’s standards) and well intentioned subgroups of Generation Identity (if there are any, otherwise no)
This article echos my feelings about the Clock boy incident from 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20190205021737/https://dailycaller.com/2015/09/28/on-ahmeds-clock-president-obama-once-again-spoke-too-soon/
Women's roles in Islam are very misunderstood by Conservatives. The Koran is very positive toward women, saying women are equal to men. Islam is generally decent to good on women (depending how they interpret the Koran). Islam is not as pro woman as Christianity or Judaism, but generally it isn't sexist either, maybe at worst consistently somewhat Toxically Macho that sometimes shifts too far right here and there along the way
I condemn the sexist aspects of Islam and I praise the feminist parts of Islam (like women having control over the stipulation of their marriage giving them more flexibility to marry the right husband)
So I morally (as in moral victory) pretty much tolerate Islam's and the Koran's treatment of women in general (the non sexist aspects)
These articles give me some unique insight into this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An-Nisa,_34#Verse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_roles_in_Islam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Islam#Legal_framework
I am against Donald Trump's Muslim travel ban
I am against France and other countries banning Muslims women from wearing Burkinis and Burqas. I support Muslim women wearing Burkinis and Burqas. It is a slippery slope because once they start bannign Burkinis and Burqas they will ban Christian crosses, and eventually even political symbols. Burkinis and Burqas are good because they make women dress modest.
I believe the Hijab is more offensive than the Burqa and Burkini but none of them are offensive.
If France and other Islamaphobic countries wants to be conservative, they should be conservative on non Muslim issues instead.
I am against the Netherlands' Islamaphobic and racist smearing of Muslims living in their country. Shame on the Netherlands for that Islamaphobic racism.
I would like to see Sharia law merged with the US constitution in the same way that Khizir Khan does and be exactly like he would want that merged legal system to be like . Then I would like to see this merged Sharia Law-US constitution be used on Muslim citizens in the US in the same exact way that Sharia law is used in Israel on Muslim citizens (but only as an alternative and with the rulings NON BINDING as in United Nations NON BINDING)
Due to the US government and some far left people/RINOs smearing and treating all Donald Trump supporters (instead of just the fringe ones who maybe evil) as domestic terrorists and violent extremists, I sympathize a lot with Muslims due to the similarly harsh smearing and treatment that they have similarly gotten by the US government and extremists on the other side of the isle since 9/11 (especially after 9/11 and during the age of ISIS). Some far left people/RINOs imply (or dog whistle) that all Trump supporters are domestic terrorists or violent extremists (instead of the alleged fringe Trump supporters) When I was a liberal, I always defended Muslims when they were attacked by neocons since I emphasized with them. Now based on what I wrote above, I will once again do so (though now as a Conservative I will sympathize with them instead of empathize with them) Plus Islam is a conservative religion and thus most Muslims are fellow conservatives so that is another reason to support them.
I just don't believe the October 31 2018 truck attack in NYC or the Swedish truck attack in 2017 were Islamic terrorism. I am not even that sure that the 2016 Nice lorre attacks was Islamic terrorism (or at least I am not that sure if Islamic terrorism was the primary motive of the attacks). Saying that every time a Muslim commits mass murder is Islamic terrorism is bigoted, ignorant, naive and short sided bordering on offensive. However, on the flip side, more than a few attacks by Muslims that are not labele as Islamic terrorism are at least somewhat Islamic terrorism (the Fort Hood shooting for example). But there are more times Muslims commit crimes that are falsely accused of being fueled by Islamic terrorism than there are times when Muslims do commit Islamic terrorism and said attacks are not labeled as Islamic terrorism but don't let facts get in the way right? The Neocon RINOs like the Bushes and Cheneys have been smearing Muslims for decades, why should you side with those neocons now?
From 2008 to 2016, in the US there was 115 domestic terrorist attacks by whites compared to 63 domestic terrorist attacks by Muslims (237 million whites vs 3.5 million Muslims). So whites committed more domestic terrorist attacks from 2008 to 2016 than Muslims. This disproves the myth that Muslims are a threat to our country, because if you say that you also have to say whites are a bigger threat to our country.
There are at least some atheists in Al Qaeda and ISIS who pretend they are Muslims so at least some people who are called Islamaic extremists are really atheists.
Christians who are killed in the Middle East by ISIS should be labeled as Christians and not worshippers
Iran/Syria/Libya/Iraq/Afghanistan
I generally take a Boll Weevil Democrat stance on The War on Terror
Donald Trump was wrong to kill Qasem Soleimani. It would have been better if he used Soleimani as a double agent but Trump was only doing what his neocon puppet masters wanted him to do
The US should never have went to war with Syria. It was imperialism by the US who has been occupying the Middle East for decades in endless warmongering ,neocon wars to Americanize countries after destroying their cultures and plundering their oil through barbaric senseless aggression.
I support the Syria Solidarity Movement, Hands off Syria and I echo their views on the war with Syria
I echo the PSL’s views of Russia’s actions in Syria
I was and still am against the Libya War (the one under Barack Obama) though I am glad that Barack Obama showed he is a hypocrite on war by engaging in that war (Obama was anti Iraq War years earlier)
I regretfully was and still am against the Iraq War (I was for it until late March 2003 then I became permanently against it). The anti Iraq War drivel ,especially since the 2010s is almost as bad as the war itself. In my opinion ,waiting patiently for the Iraq War to end and then getting politicians and voters in place to prevent such wars from occurring in the future was a much better path than protesting against the Iraq War and it still rings true today. Preventing future Iraq Wars is better than criticizing a war that ended a decade ago.
I am radically mixed on repealing the 2002 Iraq War resolution
I support the Iraq War troop surge by George W Bush in 2007. It was a smart strategy and helped turn the war around for us.
Chris Kyle was a war hero and his movie was not offensive at all, we need to fight against people triggered by him and his movie because those snowflakes are almost as bad as the people that Kyle fought to protect us against
I am spitefully glad that the UN sanctioned Iraq in the 1990s since it ticked off liberals, however it was a seemingly questionable move that may not have been effective to say the least (see Dick Cheney's comments on sanctions)
The Gulf War was a justifiable war at least on the surface but not finishing the job in Baghdad in 1990 created the Iraq War mess 13 years later. Either the US and coalition forces should have finished the job in Baghdad or found a different strategy or even objective in that situation.
I impulsively supported the Afghanistan War but its hard to say it wasn't at least justifible in hind sight, but we should have pulled out of Afghanistan in 2009 or in 2012
Joe Biden botched the Afghanistan pullout in 2021 and he should be criticized for that
Europe
I support the Basque Independent movement
I support the Catalonian Independent movement since I see that has a sequel to the Falange uprising in the 1930s
I am radically centrist to lean Christian Democratic on the Scottish Independent movement
I retroactively support the Organization to Rebuild the KPD (KPD-AO)
I retroactively support the Portuguese Republican Party
Asia conflict issues
I do not condemn the 2021 coup de tat in Myanmar ,its none of my business
I fully support the way that Donald Trump handled North Korea
I applaud the Swift Boat Veterans in their attacks on John Kerry and John McCain after seeing how radically liberal they became/become (even if John Kerry make a decent point by accident once a century)
I would have been against the Vietnam War if I was alive back then after initially supporting it. Maybe if WWI, WWII and the Korean War hadn't proceeded it i would have been open to at least be permantly neutral on that war but it is what it is. I have been against the Vietnam War my whole life. Some far left protests and hatred of the troops in that war, along with draft deferments make me PO'd. I do think Jane Fonda was cool and sinister for her North Korea tank stunt (though I'd rather her be conservative and not done her traitor act in North Vietnam than her doing that traitor act in North Vietnam). She did apologize for it in 1988 so i forgive her.
I am against the US going to war with the Philippines in the Philippine-American War since it was imperialism and took the dignity away from the Filipinos etc. The US should have let the people of the Philippines decide if they wanted to be part of the US (even if they had to remotely use a legal form of ACORN like tactics to get them to vote yes)
I retroactively support the UK building up and colonializing Australia in the 19th century due to how it turned out. Despite that, Australia is not a perfect country today by any means and they need to address fiscal issues that continue to hurt BIPOC+ in their country
Africa conflict issues
Not only am I a non interventionist now, but I was also a non interventionist as a kid in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan vetoed the UN economic sanctions against South Africa for apartheid . Reagan did that because he believed those sanctions were punitive, non constructive and also due to his ignorance of positive Marxism that rightfully was present in South Africa at the time.
Remember, sanctions don't work most of the time if ever and that sanctions only hurt the people of those countries who are the oppressed (ie possibly the blacks in Apartheid South Africa) and should thus be used only in the extremist circumstances. We want to build bridges not enflame situations.
Americas issues
As long as liberals are hypocrites on Cuba i will conitnue to morally support an embargo against them. Nothing personal against Cuba or their leaders
I am mixed to back and forth on whether US should have went to war with Spain in the Spanish-American War and apolitical on who i'd support in that war (but i would be pro American military more than pro Spainish military retroactively etc)
It was wrong and stupid for John Wilkes Booth to assainate Abraham Lincoln and it backfired on him and the South. Abraham Lincoln was a friend to the South (and a Southern enthusiast) and if he wasn't assasainated, Lincoln would have helped and protected the the South after the war better than any President could have done. However, with Lincoln killed, the South lost their friend and thus became way worse than they would have been if Lincoln had lived.
I don't care about Confederate statues, monuments, glorification or flags. The CW ended almost a century and a half ago and I live in the present and deal with things that have to do with the present
I have no issues with Gavin McInnes saying in 2015 that the Civil War was about 'states rights' . If he wants to believe that, that's fine. He is from the UK and Canada, so he doesn't have a grasp of American history so it can be expected he'd have views of American history that liberal, Democrat and progressive historians say are false.
I echo the views expressed by the writer in this article
Romani Gypsies
I have recurring dreams where I am between ethnocentric toward every race and ethnicity on Earth equally except Romani Gypsies who I am not ethnocentric toward and Left Wing Symbolic hostile in name only toward Romani Gypsies. Symbolic hostile in name only to hostile in name only is what Symbolic Racism is to Racism. Left Wing Symbolic hostile in name only is to Symbolic hostile in name only what Left Wing Racism is to Racism
Other planet religions
If there are intelligent life extraterrestrials in other solar systems, galaxies and universes who are of a Jewish type religion-culture, I would view those 'Jewish like' intelligent life extraterrestrials in those solar systems, galaxies and universes in a Friendly anti extraterrestrial JudeoEquivelentCentric way
Whites
The Jewish people haven’t done more or less good or bad than any other peoples (maybe Jews even did more good and less bad than others) There is no Jewish power or conspiracy, neo naughties have way too much of a bizarre imagination (and they also project their negative attributes onto the Jews)
These links disprove conspiracy theories involving the Jewish people as supposed conspirators
https://antisemitism.adl.org/power/
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/hoax-hate-protocols-learned-elders-zion
https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/how-conspiracy-theories-can-kill
Falsely blaming Jews for society’s ills is just as absurd as blaming whites for our society’s ills. I can easily say that if anyone is to blame for our society’s ills, it’s whites .Whites are the ones who are controlling everything and doing all of the sinister things Jews are FALSELY and wrongly accused of
Well it certainly wouldn't hurt for people to always follow the Two Commandments of Matthew-22-34-40
High ranking Jewish authorities (ie Sadducees and Pharisees) conspired with non Jewish leaders to put Jesus to death. They were jealous of Jesus, and saw him as a threat (Jesus constantly called out the Sadducees and Pharisees for their hypocrisy and evil ways during his ministry).
An unruly mob of people (the vast vast majority of whom were Jewish), in Jerusalem called out for the Romans to crucify and kill Jesus. In Matthew 27:25, Pontius Pilate washed his hands of Jesus's blood and those mob of people (the vast vast majority of whom were Jewish) who had called for Jesus to be crucified, told Pilate "His blood be on us and our children! In the Gospel of John (John 5:18, John 7:1, John 8:37) John shows that Jews wanting to kill Jesus throughout his ministry . Paul, who was himself a Jew, wrote similar things about Jews relationship with Jesus. Paul persuected Christians when he was still Jewish (1 Thess 2:14-15, Phil 3:5-6)
It doesn't matter because Jesus's death was predestined by God as a plan to save humanity. If Jesus wasn't crucified and killed, no Christians would be saved so the Jewish peoples' role in Jesus death saved humanity, because if he didn't get crucifed and killed, none of us would be able to have eternal life. Jesus gave his life willingly as a sacrifice for sin (Mark 10:45, John 18:11). It was Christians' sins that was the most directly responsible for the death of Jesus (Romans 5:8-9, 1 Timothy 1:15) Jesus rose from the dead 3 days later anyway and rose to heaven on his own free will.
Jesus was white, Mary was white and we should not get rid any images, statues, paintings, art etc of a white Jesus, a white Mary or white biblical people.
I don't care for the Catholic Church that much. It's too liberal on drugs and at times abortion, they shove holidays down peoples throats and they tend to be outliers in the Christian movement (ie the rituals for example). Moreover, they drove a lot of people away through their rigidness which caused a decline in Christianity as a whole last century.
I want the Tridentine Mass (1962 Roman Missal) to be the ordinary form and the Tridentine Mass (1955-1961 form of the liturgy or 1940s-1950 form of the liturgy ) being the Extraordinary form
I used to go the Knights of Columbus as a child and teenager a few times a year. The Knights of Columbus is a great organization
But as are all spiritually evolving, we need to pacificstly confront people who are on lower spiritual planes who are open to changing and help them see the light of the spirit so they can spiritually evolve and become higher spiritually like we would want them to spiritually help us evolve if they saw us not on an ideal spiritual plane. This can give them the true spiritual happiness, purpose and meaning that they lack now on their lower spiritual cloud
We can and should not be arrogant in our spiritual duty to help lower spiritually evolved people reach that higher spiritual plane that the spirit/mother nature etc put in place for them through their natural laws that they created, since we don't have all the answers ourselves and we are all a work in progress.
From a theological perspective and outlook and based on my SBNR exploraseeker Christian Assemblies of God perspective, we can be loving, compassionate yet speak and hold to the self evident truth that all sins (like getting a divorce, cheating on a spouse, being a homophobe, being pious like the Pharisees etc) are biblically immoral and SHOULD tell all sinners to sin no more just like Jesus said to Mary Magdelene.
If we are to be Christians, OWN IT. Christians should not worry about being labeled fundies for sharing the self evident biblical truth that sin (like not giving money to the poor, cheating on a spouse, being a homophobe, being pious like the Pharisees etc) is immoral and not Pro Christ , while helping sinners to live better and happier lives by helping them break free of their sins (assuming sinners ask us if it is and or are questioning their sexuality). Fundie is a meaningless, empty word , sticks and stones type of thing. Ideally, one or a few times try to change sinners and if not, let them alone (but tell them to convert right before they die just in case) Hardened hearts cannot change. God gave people free will to sin.
If the bible is the word of God, God never changes, + if the proof that Christianity and the bible are real in that if they weren't true , they wouldn't have survived like they did in nearly every type of society, country and peoples, then we should not be ashamed or dissuaded to say as much. The prophets in the bible and Jesus himself (ie by the Pharisees) were called every name in the book, they were persecuted and some were killed, yet they kept preaching the word of God. Judeo Christians have been persecuted forever for sharing Christ's truth, look no further than the bible (ie killings of the Saints), etc. It's no different now.
The methods of persecution change but its the same Satanic blowback for fighting sin remains. Anti Judeo Christian bigotry like all bigotry is wrong and needs to end.
We all have through God's spirit the given free choice that holds us morally and spiritually accountable for what we choose.
It is imperative all sins of all sinners (like homophobia) be dealt with in a way that doesn't dehumanize sinners
I hope and pray for all spiritually confused sinners who are open to it and if it is the spirit’s will/nature’s will etc to stop being spiritually confused and transition back to spiritually being the person God made them to be.
If they asked me if they should do that, I would tell them if they want to be absolved of any perceived ‘sin’ they should sin no more and seek advice what to do next from the spirit
Christians/SBNR people should live their lives non verbally in a proud and morally infectious way so non Christians/non SBNR people can see how happy those Christians/SBNR people are and in turn want to be Christian/SBNR etc themselves (if they aren’t already) which can very well lead to them new converts cutting out all sinful vices that they have to truly be free
Science
Science and Pyschology are not infallibe and they are wrong at least some of the time (they are HUMANS not Gods). Scientists and shrinks are right most of the time. Science is not static and it changes. Science is fluid
I am scientodific. I accept the scientific method
Climate change/eco
I support the environment, natural resources and ecological conservation
In nature we see a needed connectedness and interrelationship which show us that all things are of equal importance to the functioning of the Earth, plants-shrubs, stones, nothing but humans are the top and nothing is at the bottom, there is one single unit below humans. We have a synergy with our lands
But we still need to be at one with nature. We have to save our forests, so our ovens don't become cold when it gets colds and so our life continues to thrive on this planet.
We need to protect our forests and nature from deforestation, invasive species (which are unnatural), and from urban expansion and exploitation so nature always has a place for us. We also need to make sure people who destroy such natural environments don't do so and to possibly have them move to other areas as to reclaim such areas if they are truly beyond saving.
Too much mass migration and illegal immigration might have ecological drawbacks. Some people say that too much migration and illegal immigration causes damage to the environment and contributes to climate change: https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/28050006/SHIVA_Mehdi_Final_20180815a.pdf Since I am not a scientist I can't tell if they are right or not but its worth a read
These drawbacks are drawbacks that leads to more expansion which leads to nature and forests being replaced with towns ,cities, roads, highways, taking away that beautiful nature and forests
I half heartily conditionally support something between Eco Alter Isolationism and Eco Night Watchman’s State (19th. Century Britain Splendid Isolationism) , along with Eco Protectionism by the US and some of their allies
The US and some of their allies would use something between Eco Isolationism and Eco Night Watchman’s State (19th. Century Britain Splendid Isolationism) along with Eco Protectionism toward countries that don’t take steps to curb the eco system/environmental damage and climate change. These measures would not be removed until those countries take climate change and protection of the eco system more seriously
We need to use non liberal and non globalizationist in our ecological fight to preserve our environment and planet
I support a green revolution against over industrialization so we can have some assemblage of our pre industrialized world (since over industrializing the planet is sort of like industrial imperialism and materialistic/first world paternalism and I am against those type of things .
I am sensitive to the sorrow of far left (actually far right) Eco Terrorists since I am myself sensitive and intuitive to seeing with forests being destroyed (trees and rocks are living creatures), housing developments and commercial areas replacing open land (like what sadly happened in my hometown in New Jersey and in Florida), and similar concerns
Some of these themes were even touched upon in the Shining as the Native spirits haunted the Overlook hotel and its guests (like Jack and his family) as payback for the Europe and later the US’s industrial imperialism on Native American lands
Those type of things strip away what makes those areas unique.
However , I condemn the Eco Terrorist’s violence and terrorism as it makes things worse and backfires
Instead of violence and terrorism, Eco Terrorists should become Eco Anarchists who are something between Classic Anarchists-Anarchist Synthesists and Insurrectionary Anarchism .They should also follow the Queer Anarchist creed of possibly , as a last resort doing crime to save our ecology and environment (but petty crime that Queer Anarchists do not violence or terrorism)
We humans should be connected spiritually to nature as we are a product of our nature and the environment. We should be Pan International Environmentalists/Green Eco Advocacists to preserve nature as it has a role in molding us into what we are today.
I sometimes am tempted to advocate for our government to use militant (though ideally militant moderate my twist lib con pop) enforcement of environmental measures over the needs and freedoms of its citizens to save our ecology and environment
Maybe to save our planet , our government should require us to sacrifice our interests to the wellness of the land (splendid Earth) and aura of nature. Maybe something like Degrowth similar concept . Maybe we should also consider colonizing other planets or moons to help reduce our ecological footprint on Earth
If our planet continues to deteriorate and decay through eco and environmental decay and damage
Maybe as a radical change we can form autonomous, multipolar and green societies to really help reverse such damage to our planet , and to protect the environment and ultimately the planet
I am against the government and social media companies censoring and blocking people who criticize green energy transition. Such actions by the government and social media companies is FASCIST authoritarian censorship and is against the values that our country was founded on. That is shutting down free speech by stifling legit criticism of the government and I will not allow the government to do that. I swear to god
I believe the Superconducting Super Collider should have been built and stayed open
We cannot stop climate change effectively unless we replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views . So we need to replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views to really fight climate change by creating a world where its easier to do so
I am ok with responsible climate engineering
I support somewhat expanding the EPA while having slightly more diversity of opinions within it. The EPA helped identify and clean up the toxic mess of my hometown area and used a great unique system; superfund sites, to do so, so they have my endorsement I do feel the EPA should work closer with the locals and make them take control of their projects sooner rather than later to avoid being seen as big
I believe in Climate Change but I don't believe that Colonial, racist or patriarchal systems created or fueled it. Climate Change is not a manner of human rights. I am against Greta Thunberg's radical views on Climate Change. I do want to know the opinions of the 5 percenters of mainstream scientists who don't believe in man made climate change/climate change and what their views on this are ,not to change my view but to give them the dignity of knowing that despite me disagreeing with them I acknowledge their fringe viewpoints on climate change.
Climate Change will never cause temperatures to rise beyond 5.4F. The Tail End risks of Climate Change will never happen and all evidence supports me on this
Climate Change Apocalypse predictions if they were real (but basically are not, see below) may really be pointing to the Biblical Apocalypse (ie using the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse imagery).
We should follow the bible and be stewards for Earth even if said stewards don't believe in Climate Change.
I basically don't believe that the Climate Change Apocalypse type of climate change will happen.
I reject Deep Adaption and Jem Bernall's Deep Adaption. Deep Adaption climate predictions and Jem Bernall's climate predictions are nonsense and psuedoscience.
I am against climate change deniers being hated on for their skepticism. In a few hundred or thousand years, the future history will judge whether they were right or wrong.
I am against plastic bag bans, paper straw bans. I am against the Nord Steam pipeline being built.
I support the Keystone Pipeline being built
I support increased logging on federal lands
I support Nuclear energy and wind energy
I am a Radical Environmentalist, but I prefer using nature as a gateway to its creator -God. This is an effective way of destroying Capitalism (especially Neoliberalism, Social Liberal Capitalism, crony Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism) , patriarchy, and stopping globalizationism which would ubite people and repair senseless damage to nature at the same time. Plus it can lead people to God and living in a Book of Acts Christian type of world
I feel Radical Environmentalism is good because its bold and cuts through bureaucracy and feels more natural and less offensive to anti environmentalists
Space
I support sending humans into space which is why I hope NASA brings the Space Shuttle program back. I hope one day space travel becomes as common as airline travel.
Biology/Chemistry/Phsyics
I generally agree with Daniel Dennett’s critique Sam Harris’ views on free will but I believe Harris makes convincing counter arguements that I haven’t heard a good enough rebuttal for. Regardless, that book Free Will does not undermine morality or take way the importance of political and social freedom
I pragmatically believe that something between Progressive Creationism and Intelligent Design is real since God purposely hid scientific proof of his work from the learned (scientists) so that babes (believers) would believe him based on faith and reason instead of science and materialist findings. Luke from the Gospel of Luke was one of the best medical/science people ever and he believed in something between Progressive Creationism and Intelligent Design.
I am apolitical on pandemic politics and I ignore all politics things related to it but since I wrote so many views here i say why not write about that stuff too so here are some of the few left right views on it as noted below:
I fully support Piers Corbyn's right to protest vaccine at that clinic in Britain in 2021 and I feel it was an amusing and bold move. But if i was there, I would have literally thrown him out of that clinic
I would never do or even encourage this but if right wingers who are anti vaxxers want to get back at pro vaxxers for their mandates and restrictions that they enforced during the pandemic (especially in 2020 and 2021) the best way to do that would be for the right wing anti vaxxers to live (and to get others to live) as unfree and restricted post pandemic as they lived in 2020 and 2021 during the pandemic. Which means they push for lockdowns, travel restrictions, social distancing and possibly face coverings being a permanent thing (this time for non health reasons) while they themselves self isolate, social distance themselves in public all the time, avoid any place indoors or outdoors with crowds that are large enough to violate said anti vaxxers self imposed social distancing mandate, stop traveling far or travel restricted, don't have anyone over their houses (and vice versa) or only do so if it would have been approved during the pandemic etc.
I would never do or even encourage this but if right wingers who are anti vaxxers want to get back at pro vaxxers for their mandates and restrictions that they enforced during the pandemic (especially in 2020 and 2021) the best way to do that would be for the right wing anti vaxxers to live (and to get others to live) as 'unfree' (ymmv) and restricted post pandemic as they lived in 2020 and 2021 during the pandemic.
Which means push for lockdowns, travel restrictions, social distancing and possibly face coverings being a permanent thing (this time for non health reasons) while they themselves self isolate, social distance themselves in public all the time, avoid any place indoors or outdoors with crowds that are large enough to violate said anti vaxxers self imposed social distancing mandate, stop traveling far or travel restricted, don't have anyone over their houses (and vice versa) or only do so if it would have been approved during the pandemic etc.
This is not necessarily out of spite, its just for consistency sake (can't magically tell anti vaxxers to go back to normal so this hammers that point home) and to hammer the point home to anti vaxxers that while they couldn't stop the government and their henchmen from taking away their 'freedoms' (ymmv) during the pandemic the anti vaxxers can however stop the pro vaxx crowd from brainwashing them and others to go back to normal after the pandemic by living as restricted post pandemic as they did during the pandemic for the rest of their lives since they can't mandate anti vaxxers the opposite way of how they mandated them during the pandemic (ie they can't force anti vaxxers to travel or to not self isolate or to have tons of people over at their houses etc).
Plus if doing the above things shuts up those SJW anti vaxxers than that's goo dtoo
Sara Haines is wrong. Face coverings will NOT and should NOT be a permeant thing in the US or anywhere. However I am against laws that require people to show their faces in public. I actually want to see a lot of people wear costume masks in the future in public (but not in October), to make something good come out of the face covering mandates.
I am fine with the Mises caucus’s stance on lockdowns
Jimmy Dore’s pandemic views have a few broken clock moments here and there (though maybe more since unlike Jimmy, I don’t follow it closely) and maybe in a decade or decades from now a lot of what he said about it might be confirmed to be in the ballpark of being plausible if not truthiness
I somewhat support a lot of what RFK Jr said about the pandemic
Since early Februrary 2022 I believe that Nancy Pelosi's face covering mandate for the House of Reps should be stopped and no one in the house of reps should be requried to cover their faces
I do believe a small fraction (ymmv/give or take) of anti vaxxers think they are being persecuted and censored and if they believe it, whether or not that is true, that is sad.
I believe that if people from Earth could have teleported to countries on other planets in other galaxies that have intelligent life beings on them in 2020, 2021 that those people should have done so and done so without social distancing, without covering their face, even if they weren't vaccinated and without isolating themselves (even if they tested positive for covid before going and even if the went back and forth between Earth and those planets multiple times throughout 2020 and 2021).Aliens on other planets are immune to all of our viruses since aliens are not human
I strongly morally and cautiously support the Canadian truckers in their protest but even if I didn’t I still would be against Justin Trudeau using the emergency act on protestors and I still would be against his government going after bank accounts of protestors and supporters and similar underhanded things just as I am now. However, I don't believe he is a dictator as saying he is a dictator is an insult to all real dictators, but his actions do make me believe he is almot in the realm of being a super Authoartarian. Justin Trudeau was wrong to smear the Canadian freedom convoy protestors as bigots
VLADIMIR PUTIN DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CANADIAN TRUCKER PROTEST AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A FOOL
I believe in Reincarnation
There is an afterlife after people die and most scientists agree or say they don't know
Psychology
Psycho Analysis is a real science (except when used by wokeists then its psuedo science) and anyone who says otherwise is a fake scientist.
Misc
I support making English the official language of the US government
I sympathize with Donald Trump's Garden of American Heroes idea as I feel it would have made up for the statues that were destroyed or taken down (to avoid being destroyed) in 2020 etc and I approve of most of the names on that statue list. But I am strongly against The National Garden of American Heroes being created. The federal government (including our Presidents) should not tell us who our historical heroes should be and should not force these names upon us. Who decides who is great? What right does our government have to dictate to us who was 'worthy' enough to get a statue? This is the US, not CCP China. We already have tasteful ways to honor our greats (Walk of Fame, naming things after heroes etc). Moreover statues of our 'heroes' continue to be erected, but thankfully without our federal government having a say in it which they should not have any say in.
LA Times was wrong to tell people not to consume so much in order to 'stop' the Supply chain woes. People should reject the LA Times tone deaf and WRONG, far left advice and demand that the LA Times apologize for their stupid suggestion
The Washington Post's dont-rant-about-short-staffed-stores-supply-chain-woes-try-lower-expectations/ article was a hot mess , fake news and trash , far left extremist nonsense.
I am ok with social housing like in Austria being rolled out in the US. We need to overcome housing barriers between races-ethnicities and have constructive talks about housing, including real and meaningful talks about industrial, political and fiscal feasibility not the other way around
We need to get urban planners to take the spirit of social housing along with BIPOC needs into account. I mean housing that is mixed income along with civilian approval boards so that we can overcome gentrification and provide long term homes which are dignified.
Developers should compete for building permits by showing local civilian boards the post equal-tible voting models for reflecting the diversity of the current residents that would benefit from the mixed incone housing. This would rightfully reflect the current demographics of the community rather than the elite bourgeois clientele. This forces developers to meet the needs and interests of majority-minority communities via quality and cost
As a kid in my visits to Newark ,Perth Amboy and New Brunswick in the 1980s and 1990s I saw first hand how BIPOC were forced to live in undignifying ways . I hope the policy proposal above can help prevent and fix that forever
I am against seat belt laws for everyone. Force auto companies to make their cars safer instead of being all Karen about it. Use a one use only social credit system just for auto issues to punish people who get in accidents to encourage people to buckle up. Maybe have more airbags and non bucklable restraints in automobiles to stop accidents along with this.
I am fine with red light cameras being removed. The less government spying, the better. If more accidents happen due to that then I'll pivot from this view somewhere
I am ok with cosmopolitanism
If it wasn't for so many people being brainwashed to do certain things and new technology wasn't shoved down our throats, I'd appreciate and champion new tech like I use to in the 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s
I am sort of a Neo Luddite . I pitiful/ half way supportive of some aspects of Post-Left/Anarcho Primitivism. I find the whole concepts of trying to 'civilize' people offensive. Sometimes simpler is better. Though I usually favor a technologically upgraded version of simpler times.
At worst, I would want Friendster to replace Facebook, the Internet to be accessed only via floppy disks and through dial up (with only specific types of sites), 1950s or 1960s automobiles, earliest Iphone incarnations with limited minutes and similar things
Seeing more and more new technology makes me a bit non enthused or even a bit sad about the present and future than I normally am, since it means people are losing touch with natural things, old school things and the human experience. New technology makes things too easy for people, and makes them seem elitist to people who died before they got to use those new technologies or who used lesser technologies at the same age
Moreover, it makes it seem that people 'need' things like mobile phones, social media, gps navigation systems in cars, etc when that isn't the case.
I critique modern civilization and I sort of in between tongue in cheek and serious but slightly more than half heartily advocate for a soft return to our less civilized ways via slight deindustrialization (which also will help the environment) , scaling back or high technology (see above) and by abandoning large scale organizational structures (and possibly slightly or possibly more so getting rid of labor or specialization (but within the boundaries of my views in my fiscal views section)
Stuff like the internet and social media alienate us making it easy for the government to coerce us and oppress us when they want to do so.
Very old school societies (like B.C old school) are less susceptible to war, violence (debated), and disease. When the Europeans came to the Americas, Africa, etc they dehumanized the populations by trying to 'civilize' them. It was offensive and wrong. I try to bury those thoughts and feelings since I hate the PC-SJW woke crowd, but the fact is, if I was one of those 'uncivilized' natives of the Caribbean, Africa, Australia, the pacific etc back then, I would feel lower than dirt with the way those elite, rich and bourgeois Imperialists tried to civilize me and say my culture was inferior to their culture. Of course if those Imperialist and European explorers may have needed to do that for self worth and to overcome feelings of depression, inferiority, being bullied when they were young, etc (i.e Napoloean complex) so i can understand why they did that, but still it was majorly wrong.
We still see that today with the Right being looked down on by the left for not being 'civilized'
I want video games to be as hard now as they were in the 1980s and 1990s (ie cheap level design, not telling the player where to go, unfair gameplay etc, ie Nintendo Hard).
I am against gambling being legal (except if i gamble myself then its ok just for me) and I generally to solidly don't believe that people should gamble .Gambling is a sin.
I am even pacifist toward stuffed animals, dolls, action figures and computers. I don't hurt them ever. I would never hurt them ever unless I was warped to a sci fi reality and they were attacking me, then it would be just to get them off of me or to de escalate. However, if they got destroyed in an accidental fire or explosion, I'd be fine with it
Media
The media is wrong to exploit pain and suffering through their news story explor
News story explotation is an issue and is something that needs to be fixed. There is no reason that non war related rescue stories, missing persons stories and kidnapppings and similar non stories should be anything more than local or regional stories. People should worry about their own lives and not think about the above stories.
The news also covers non hate crime mass shootings, some terrorist attacks (like the 2018 NYC road rage attack or the 2017 Sweden beer truck rage attack) way way way too much. By exploiting those stories, those stories traumaitize people (via repitition), makes people hate Muslims or gun owners and similar groups due to said explotiation, give the perps who commit those crimes the exposure they want which leads to copy cat crimes (see VT killer's motive for example). It's like news stations and agencies profit over the pain and suffering of other people, ecspecially by exploiting them and that is wrong. People who rubberneck off those stories are also wrong for taking part in their suffering by them further exploiting their pain and suffering all to make viewers feel good about themselves for virtue signaling about it.
When the news media and corporations shove terror attacks down our throats (and force those terrorism stories to have a significant impact on society), they are spreading terror, and doing the job of the terrorists for them
24 hours news, their viewers (ie social media), internet etc fan the above pain and further political divide that come out of those tragedies. see CNN effect for more
Missing persons stories, kidnapping stories, non war related rescue stories and similar non stories should stay local or regional and not be national. There is no reason people from outside those regions should know about those stories. By the national media covering those type of non stories, they are degrading the importance of real stories like terrorist attacks, wars, viruses etc.
Network is a great satire of the issues with our media today with its relevant point that it makes about corporate run, sensationalist media and their impact on society which still holds true.today, if not more so.
Words are like weapons, satellites of news stations etc are like the new artillery. News today like Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and TV political pundits increasingly polarize us with their news judgements (which includes fake news and disinformation) . This includes electronic warfare in the same vain. Our media who influences us in politics is owned by large congolomerates who seek to profit over dividing us. Tomorrow Never Dies makes a good point about this (along with China's wolf warrior diplomacy with Western companies)
Our issue is our whole celebrity culture and fandom culture (which includes the overreaction, rubber necking and explotation of every celebrities death via social media) .
This culture breeds obsessed people to seek out their 15 minutes of fame with their celebrity that they idolize. In particular, with social media and the internet many of the biggest fans are happily called 'Stans' for their favorite idols. Social media allows them to 'keep track' of their favorite idols 24/7/365 which includes easier interaction with them. Moreover, Youtube and Twitter fuels explotation of people who wouldn't be famous if not for Youtube and Twitter
Comments
Post a Comment